| Literature DB >> 31704989 |
Kai-Yu Ho1, Michelle Harty2, Jessica Kellogg2, Kelly Teter2, Szu-Ping Lee2, Yu-Jen Chang3, Gregory Bashford4.
Abstract
A patellar-tendon-bearing (PTB) bar is a common design feature used in the socket of trans-tibial prostheses to place load on the pressure-tolerant tissue. As the patellar tendon in the residual limb is subjected to the perpendicular compressive force not commonly experienced in normal tendons, it is possible for tendon degeneration to occur over time. The purpose of this study was to compare patellar tendon morphology and neovascularity between the residual and intact limbs in trans-tibial amputees and healthy controls. Fifteen unilateral trans-tibial amputees who utilized a prosthesis with a PTB feature and 15 age- and sex- matched controls participated. Sonography was performed at the proximal, mid-, and distal portions of each patellar tendon. One-way ANOVAs were conducted to compare thickness and collagen fiber organization and a chi-square analysis was used to compare the presence of neovascularity between the three tendon groups. Compared to healthy controls, both tendons in the amputees exhibited increased thickness at the mid- and distal portions and a higher degree of collagen fiber disorganization. Furthermore, neovascularity was more common in the tendon of the residual limb. Our results suggest that the use of a prosthesis with a PTB feature contributes to morphological changes in bilateral patellar tendons.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31704989 PMCID: PMC6841932 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52747-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Participants Characteristics.
| Gender | Trans-tibial amputees (n = 15) | Healthy controls (n = 15) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Females; 12 Males | 3 Females; 12 Males | ||
| Age, y | 52.5 ± 19.1 | 51.4 ± 17.7 | 0.868 |
| Height, cm | 180.2 ± 9.1 | 176.3 ± 6.9 | 0.196 |
| Weight, kg | 93.0 ± 20.4 | 81.0 ± 13.0 | 0.064 |
| Body mass index (BMI), kg/m2 | 28.7 ± 6.0 | 25.9 ± 2.8 | 0.114 |
| VISA-P | 70.3 ± 20.2 | 94.0 ± 5.4 | 0.000* |
| Side of amputation | 7 Right, 8 Left | NA | NA |
| Years wearing prosthesis | 15.9 ± 17.4 | NA | NA |
| Reason for amputation | 2 infection; 3 peripheral artery disease; 9 trauma; 1 congenital defects with subsequent amputation | NA | NA |
| PEQ (Pain in residual limb) | 68.5 ± 38.9 | NA | NA |
| PEQ (Ambulation) | 80.3 ± 30.6 | NA | NA |
| PLUS-M T score | 62.9 ± 11.3 | NA | NA |
*Indicates a statistically significant difference between trans-tibial amputees and healthy controls using an independent t test.
Figure 1Measurement for tendon thickness: the distance between the borders of the patellar tendon was manually identified and quantified at the (A) proximal, (B) mid-, and (C) distal portions of the patellar tendon.
Figure 2Measurement for peak spatial frequency radius (PSFR) of the patellar tendon: a region of interest (ROI) in the middle 50% of the tendon was manually outlined and analyzed.
Figure 3The comparisons of patellar tendon thickness between the residual and intact limbs in trans-tibial amputees and healthy controls’ limbs. *Indicates a statistically significant difference from the control limb from ANOVA and post-hoc analyses.
Figure 4The comparisons of peak spatial frequency radius (PSFR) between the residual and intact limbs in trans-tibial amputees and healthy controls’ limbs. *Indicates a statistically significant difference from the control limb from ANOVA and post-hoc analyses.