Joaquin M Munoz-Rodriguez1,2, Javier Lopez-Monclus3,4, Marina Perez-Flecha5,6, Alvaro Robin-Valle de Lersundi5,6, Luis A Blazquez-Hernando7, Ana Royuela-Vicente1,2, Juan P Garcia-Hernandez8, Aritz Equisoain-Azcona1,2, Manuel Medina-Pedrique5,6, Miguel A Garcia-Urena5,6. 1. Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, C. Joaquín Rodrigo, 1, 28222, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain. 2. Autónoma de Madrid University, Madrid, Spain. 3. Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, C. Joaquín Rodrigo, 1, 28222, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain. jlopezmonclus@yahoo.es. 4. Autónoma de Madrid University, Madrid, Spain. jlopezmonclus@yahoo.es. 5. Henares University Hospital, Av. de Marie Curie, 0, 28822, Coslada, Madrid, Spain. 6. Complex Abdominal Wall Research Group From Francisco de Vitoria University, Madrid, Spain. 7. Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, M-607, 9, 100, 28034, Madrid, Spain. 8. Alcala de Henares University, Campus Universitario-C/ 19, Av. de Madrid, Km 33,600, 28871, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The best approach for lateral incisional hernia is not known. Posterior component separation (reverse TAR) offers the possibility of using the retromuscular space for medial extension of the challenging preperitoneal plane. The aim of our multicenter study was to compare the operative and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) using two open surgical techniques from the lateral approach: a totally preperitoneal vs a reverse TAR. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed since 2012 to 2020. Patients with lateral incisional hernia treated through a lateral approach were identified from a prospectively maintained multicenter database. Reverse TAR was added when the preperitoneal plane could not be safely dissected. The results obtained using these two lateral approaches were compared, including short- and long-term complications, as well as PROMs, using the specific tool EuraHSQoL. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were identified. Reverse TAR was performed in 33 patients and lateral retromuscular preperitoneal approach in 28 patients. Both groups were comparable in terms of sociodemographic and comorbidities variables. Surgical site occurrences occurred in 13 cases (21.3%), with 8 patients (13.1%) requiring procedural intervention. During a median follow-up of 34 months, no incisional hernia recurrence was registered. There was a case (1.6%) of symptomatic bulging that required reoperation. Also 12 patients (19.7%) presented an asymptomatic bulging. No statistically significant difference was identified in the complications and PROMs between the two procedures. CONCLUSION: The open lateral retromuscular reconstruction using very large meshes that reach the midline has excellent long-term results with acceptable postoperative complications, including PROMs. A reverse TAR may be added, when necessary, without increasing complications and obtaining similar long-term results.
BACKGROUND: The best approach for lateral incisional hernia is not known. Posterior component separation (reverse TAR) offers the possibility of using the retromuscular space for medial extension of the challenging preperitoneal plane. The aim of our multicenter study was to compare the operative and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) using two open surgical techniques from the lateral approach: a totally preperitoneal vs a reverse TAR. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed since 2012 to 2020. Patients with lateral incisional hernia treated through a lateral approach were identified from a prospectively maintained multicenter database. Reverse TAR was added when the preperitoneal plane could not be safely dissected. The results obtained using these two lateral approaches were compared, including short- and long-term complications, as well as PROMs, using the specific tool EuraHSQoL. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were identified. Reverse TAR was performed in 33 patients and lateral retromuscular preperitoneal approach in 28 patients. Both groups were comparable in terms of sociodemographic and comorbidities variables. Surgical site occurrences occurred in 13 cases (21.3%), with 8 patients (13.1%) requiring procedural intervention. During a median follow-up of 34 months, no incisional hernia recurrence was registered. There was a case (1.6%) of symptomatic bulging that required reoperation. Also 12 patients (19.7%) presented an asymptomatic bulging. No statistically significant difference was identified in the complications and PROMs between the two procedures. CONCLUSION: The open lateral retromuscular reconstruction using very large meshes that reach the midline has excellent long-term results with acceptable postoperative complications, including PROMs. A reverse TAR may be added, when necessary, without increasing complications and obtaining similar long-term results.
Authors: Y Renard; L de Mestier; A Cagniet; N Demichel; C Marchand; J-L Meffert; R Kianmanesh; J-P Palot Journal: Hernia Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 4.739