| Literature DB >> 31704230 |
Zaina Bouzia1, Michalis Georgiou1, Sarah Hull1, Anthony G Robson1, Kaoru Fujinami2, Tryfon Rotsos3, Nikolas Pontikos1, Gavin Arno1, Andrew R Webster4, Alison J Hardcastle5, Alessia Fiorentino5, Michel Michaelides6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the natural history of Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) associated with GUCY2D variants (GUCY2D-LCA) in a cohort of children and adults, in preparation for trials of novel therapies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31704230 PMCID: PMC7013380 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.10.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0002-9394 Impact factor: 5.258
Variants in the GUCY2D Cohort
| P | Family ID | Con. | Hom. variant | Variant 1 | Protein Effect | Variant Type | PUV | Variant 2 | Protein Effect | Variant Type | PUV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | GC12356 | c.307G>A† | p.(Glu103Lys)† | Missense | c.238_252delGCCGCCGCCCGCCTG | p.(Ala80_Leu84del) | In-frame deletion | ||||
| P2A | GC19319 | c.307G>A† | p.(Glu103Lys)† | Missense | c.1762C>T | p.(Arg 588Trp) | Missense | ||||
| P2B | GC19319 | c.307G>A† | p.(Glu103Lys)† | Missense | c.1762C>T | p.(Arg 588Trp) | Missense | ||||
| P3 | GC1015 | c.380C>T | p.(Pro127Leu) | Missense | c.901_908delCTTCGCAG | p.(Leu301Glyfs*15) | Frameshift | ||||
| P4 | GC17851 | c.553G>C | p.(Ala185Pro) | Missense | ✓ | c.721+5G>T | Splicing | ✓ | |||
| P5 | GC19719 | c.307G>A† | p.(Glu103Lys)† | Missense | c.2872A>C | p.(Ser958Arg) | Missense | ✓ | |||
| P6 | GC3264 | ✓ | c.652delA | p.(Met218Trpfs*13) | Frameshift | ✓ | |||||
| P7 | GC22697 | c.2837C>A | p.(Ala946Glu) | Missense | ✓ | c.2969G>T | p.(Gly990Val) | Missense | ✓ | ||
| P8A | GC19606 | ✓ | c.3056A>C | p.(His1019Pro) | Missense | ||||||
| P8B | GC19606 | ✓ | c.3056A>C | p.(His1019Pro) | Missense | ||||||
| P9 | GC16211 | ✓ | c.3098_3099insCGTGCTCT | p.(Gly1034Valfs*15) | Frameshift | ||||||
| P10 | GC16935 | c.1343C>A | p.(Ser448*) | Nonsense | c.1958delG | p.(Gly653Glufs*2) | Frameshift | ✓ | |||
| P11 | GC16929 | c.2302C>T | p.(Arg768Trp) | Missense | c.1978C>T | p.(Arg660*) | Nonsense | ||||
| P12 | GC18677 | c.2384G>A | p.(Arg795Gln) | Missense | c.1211T>C | p.(Leu404Pro) | Missense | ✓ | |||
| P13 | GC1036 | c.307G>A† | p.(Glu103Lys)† | Missense | c.2849C>T | p.(Ala950Val) | Missense | ||||
| P14 | GC17418 | ✓ | c.c.2120T>C | p.(Leu707Pro) | Missense | ✓ | |||||
| P15 | GC24539 | ✓ | ✓ | c.3044-2A>G | Splicing | ✓ | |||||
| P16 | GC18674 | c.2944+1delG | Splicing | ✓ | c.2858C>T | p.(Ser953Leu) | Missense | ✓ | |||
| P17 | GC24284 | ✓ | c.1694T>C | p.(Phe565Ser) | missense | c.2633_2636delAAGT | p.(Gln878Argfs*17) | Frameshift | ✓ | ||
| P18 | GC17645 | ✓ | c.129_134delTCTGCT | p.(Leu44_Leu45del) | In-frame deletion | ||||||
| P19 | GC17984 | c.2944delG | p.(Gly982Valfs*39) | Frameshift | c.2291delC | p.(Pro764Leufs*20) | Frameshift | ✓ |
P and GC no = patient identifier; Con. = consanguinity; Hom. = Homozygous; PUV = previously unreported variant; † = same variants; A and B denotes siblings
Figure 1GUCY2D gene and protein domains. (A) Schematic diagram showing the GUCY2D gene, protein domains, and the location of variants identified in our cohort. (B) Predicted or experimentally determined effect of reported variants on guanylate cyclase function. Variants in the transmembrane domain have not been experimentally investigated. Arrows indicate decrease (↓) and increase (↑) of the function. CCD = cyclase catalytic domain; DD = dimerization domain; ECD = extracellular domain; GC-E = guanylate cyclase 2D; JMD = juxtamembrane domain; KHD = kinase homology domain; SP = signal peptide; TMD = transmembrane domain.
Predicted Effect of GUCY2D Variants
| Effect | N | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Frameshift | 9 | 21.4% |
| In-frame deletion | 3 | 7.1% |
| Missense | 25 | 59.5% |
| Nonsense | 1 | 2.4% |
| Splicing defect | 4 | 9.5% |
Total n = 42, 2 alleles per patient.
Refraction and Visual Acuity in the GUCY2D Cohort
| N | % | |
|---|---|---|
| VA in best-seeing eye, at initial examination: | ||
| NPL | 4 | 19% |
| PL | 4 | 19% |
| HM | 4 | 19% |
| Fixate on large objects | 3 | 14% |
| 0.4 logMAR | 1 | 4% |
| 0.48 logMAR | 1 | 4% |
| 0.78 logMAR | 1 | 4% |
| 1.2 logMAR | 1 | 4% |
| 1.5 logMAR | 1 | 4% |
| 1.56 logMAR | 1 | 4% |
| Refraction: | ||
| Hyperopia | 12 | 57% |
| Myopia | 3 | 14% |
| Plano | 2 | 9% |
| Not available | 4 | 19% |
HM = hand motions; NPL = no perception of light; PL = perception of light; VA = visual acuity.
Figure 2Color fundus photographs and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging of the right and left eyes of 3 patients (Optos plc, Dunfermline, UK). (A) Patient P19. Normal fundus appearance and central foveal hyperautofluorescence on FAF, without mid-peripheral or peripheral changes. (B) Patient P2A. Mild yellow macular atrophy, as well as fine peripheral pigmentary changes. Normal FAF images apart from central small areas of hypoautofluorescence. (C) Patient P13. Extensive peripheral retinal pigment epithelium atrophy and pigment hypertrophy with large lacunae of chorioretinal atrophy in far periphery in both eyes. On FAF there is central early hypoautofluorescence with small central foci of hyperautofluorescence and mid- to far-peripheral generalized hypoautofluorescence with granular hyperautofluorescence and discrete scattered large patches of hypoautofluorescence. L = left eye; R = right eye; VA; visual acuity; yo = years old.
Figure 3Graphical representation of full-field electroretinography (ERG) findings and examples of recordings. (A) ISCEV-standard full-field ERG amplitudes are plotted as a percentage of the lower limit of normal obtained in a control group for right (RE) and left (LE) eyes. The findings were consistent with a severe cone-rod dystrophy (Patients P1, P2A, P2B, P3, and P4) or severe photoreceptor dystrophy (P16; undetectable ERGs). (B) Examples of ISCEV-standard full-field ERG traces recorded from Patients P1, P2, P3, and P4 and a representative unaffected control subject (N) for comparison. Dark-adapted (DA) ERGs are shown for flash strengths of 0.01 and 10.0 cd.s/m2 (DA 0.01; DA 10.0). Light-adapted (LA) ERGs are shown for a flash strength of 3.0 cd.s/m2 (LA 3.0; 30 Hz and 2 Hz). Recordings are shown from 1 eye with traces superimposed to demonstrate reproducibility. Note the higher scaling factor used to illustrate low-amplitude DA ERGs compared with the control. Broken lines replace blink artefacts that occur after the ERG b-waves. Pattern ERGs were not recordable owing to the effects of marked nystagmus in all patients.
Figure 4Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging of 4 patients (P1, P4, P2B, P3). OCT findings at baseline were grouped into 4 different grades based on ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) changes: (A) grade 1: continuous/intact EZ; (B) grade 2: focally disrupted EZ; (C) grade 3: focally disrupted EZ with RPE changes; and (D) grade 4: diffuse EZ and RPE changes. The arrowheads point to the attenuated EZ. The right column presents the corresponding FAF images: (A) normal FAF appearance; (B) central early hypoautofluorescence with small central foci of hyperautofluorescence; (C) normal FAF images apart from central small areas of hypoautofluorescence; and (D) central and mid-peripheral hypoautofluorescence. The white arrows mark the border of the corresponding OCT line scans. VA = visual acuity; yo = years old.
Optical Coherence Tomography Findings in the GUCY2D Cohort
| Patient | VA (OD/OS) | Age at Baseline OCT (Y) | Follow-up | OCT EZ Appearance at Both Baseline and Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 1.3/1.2 | 47.3 | 6.2 | Continuous/intact EZ |
| P2A | 1.8/1.5 | 59.6 | 4.2 | Focally disrupted with RPE changes |
| P2B | HM | 54.8 | 4.2 | Focally disrupted with RPE changes |
| P3 | 1.3/1 | 47.4 | 13.3 | Diffuse EZ/RPE change |
| P4 | 0.48/0.6 | 20.3 | 3.0 | Focally disrupted EZ |
| P5 | 0.48/0.62 | 8.0 | 4.0 | Continuous/intact EZ |
| P8A | HM | 25.4 | NA | Continuous/intact EZ |
| P9 | HM | 11.3 | 3.0 | Continuous/intact EZ |
| P13 | HM | 76.4 | 2.0 | Focally disrupted EZ |
| P14 | PL | 7.3 | 6.4 | Continuous/intact EZ |
| P19 | PL | 18.2 | NA | Continuous/intact EZ |
EZ = ellipsoid zone; HM = hand motions; OCT = optical coherence tomography; PL = perception of light; RPE = retinal pigment epithelium; VA = visual acuity.
No available follow-up OCT scan.