Literature DB >> 3170139

Effects of turbulence on signal intensity in gradient echo images.

A J Evans1, R A Blinder, R J Herfkens, C E Spritzer, D O Kuethe, E K Fram, L W Hedlund.   

Abstract

Although the appearance of laminar vascular flow in magnetic resonance (MR) images has been characterized, there is no general agreement about the effect of turbulent flow on MR signal intensity. This study uses a fast scan gradient echo pulse sequence to evaluate nonpulsatile turbulent flow in two different models. The first model simulated flow in normal vascular structure. It generated nonpulsatile, laminar and turbulent flow in straight, smooth-walled Plexiglas tubes. The second model simulated flow through a vascular stenosis. It generated nonpulsatile, laminar, and turbulent flow through an orifice. Velocities and flow rates ranged from low physiologic to well above the physiologic range (velocity = .3 to 280 cm/second, flow rate from .15 to 40 L/minute). Transition from laminar to turbulent flow was observed with dye streams. Turbulent flow in straight, smooth-walled vessels was not associated with a decrease in MR signal intensity even at the highest velocities and flow rates studied. The transition from laminar to turbulent flow through an orifice is not associated with a decrease in gradient echo signal intensity. As the intensity of the turbulent flow increases, however, there is a threshold above which signal intensity decreases linearly as turbulence increases (r = .97). This study suggests that flow in normal vascular structures should not be associated with decreased signal intensity in gradient echo images. Turbulent flow through areas such as valves, valvular lesions or vascular stenoses, may be associated with a decrease in gradient echo signal intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3170139     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198807000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  9 in total

1.  Multi-parametric quantification of tricuspid regurgitation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: A comparison to echocardiography.

Authors:  Diego Medvedofsky; Javier León Jiménez; Karima Addetia; Amita Singh; Roberto M Lang; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  Valvular heart disease: what does cardiovascular MRI add?

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Masci; Steven Dymarkowski; Jan Bogaert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Valvular Heart Disease: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Management.

Authors:  Roshin C Mathew; Adrián I Löffler; Michael Salerno
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Heart valve disease: investigation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Saul G Myerson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 5.  The Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Aortic Stenosis and Regurgitation.

Authors:  Marco Guglielmo; Chiara Rovera; Mark G Rabbat; Gianluca Pontone
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 6.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance physics for clinicians: Part II.

Authors:  John D Biglands; Aleksandra Radjenovic; John P Ridgway
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Non-invasive stroke volume assessment in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: left-sided data mandatory.

Authors:  Gert-Jan Mauritz; J Tim Marcus; Anco Boonstra; Pieter E Postmus; Nico Westerhof; Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the importance of short echo time.

Authors:  Kieran R O'Brien; Ruvin S Gabriel; Andreas Greiser; Brett R Cowan; Alistair A Young; Andrew J Kerr
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary arteries.

Authors:  S C Gerretsen; M E Kooi; S Schalla; T Delhaas; G Snoep; J M A Van Engelshoven; T Leiner
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.167

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.