Literature DB >> 31700635

Over-the-scope clips are cost-effective in recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding.

Armin Kuellmer1, Juliane Behn2, Benjamin Meier2, Andreas Wannhoff2, Dominik Bettinger1, Robert Thimme1, Karel Caca2, Arthur Schmidt1.   

Abstract

Background: A recent prospective randomised controlled trial ('STING') showed superiority of over-the-scope clips compared to standard treatment in recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding. Cost-effectiveness studies on haemostasis with over-the-scope clips have not been reported so far. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the higher efficacy of the over-the-scope clips treatment outweighs the higher costs of the device compared to standard clips.
Methods: For the analysis, the study population of the STING trial was used. Costs for the hospital stay in total as well as treatment-related costs were obtained. The average cost-effectiveness ratio, representing the mean costs per designated outcome, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, expressing the additional costs of a new treatment strategy per difference in outcome were calculated. The designated outcome was defined as successful haemostasis without rebleeding within seven days, which was the primary endpoint of the STING trial. Average cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated for total costs of the hospital stay as well as the haemostasis treatment alone. The cost-effectiveness analysis is taken from the perspective of the care provider.
Results: Total costs and treatment-related costs per patient were 13,007.07 € in the standard group vs 12,808.56 € in the over-the-scope clip group (p = 0.812) and 2084.98 € vs 1984.71 € respectively (p = 0.663). The difference was not statistically significant. Total costs per successful haemostasis (average cost-effectiveness ratio) were 30,677.05 € vs 15,104.43 € and 4917.41 € vs 2340.46 € for the haemostasis treatment. The additional costs per successful haemostasis with over-the-scope clip treatment (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) is -468.18 € for the whole treatment and -236.49€ for the haemostasis treatment. Conclusions: Over-the-scope clip treatment is cost-effective in recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding. © Author(s) 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Over-the-scope clips; average cost-effectiveness ratio; cost-effectiveness analysis; incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; peptic ulcer bleeding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31700635      PMCID: PMC6826528          DOI: 10.1177/2050640619871754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  21 in total

Review 1.  Generalised cost-effectiveness analysis: an aid to decision making in health.

Authors:  Raymond C Hutubessy; Rob M Baltussen; Tessa Tan Torres-Edejer; David B Evans
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.561

2.  Hemostatic spray powder TC-325 for GI bleeding in a nationwide study: survival and predictors of failure via competing risks analysis.

Authors:  Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago; Diego Burgos-Santamaría; Leticia Pérez-Carazo; Enric Brullet; Lucía Ciriano; Faust Riu Pons; Miguel Ángel de Jorge Turrión; Susana Prados; Daniel Pérez-Corte; Irene Becerro-Gonzalez; Emma Martinez-Moneo; Angel Barturen; Ignacio Fernández-Urién; Antonio López-Serrano; Carlos Ferre-Aracil; María Lopez-Ibañez; Carlos Carbonell; Oscar Nogales; Eva Martínez-Bauer; Álvaro Terán Lantarón; Giulia Pagano; Enrique Vázquez-Sequeiros; Agustín Albillos
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Farzan F Bahin; Steven J Heitman; Khalid N Rasouli; Hema Mahajan; Duncan McLeod; Eric Y T Lee; Stephen J Williams; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  [Cost assessment for endoscopic procedures in the German diagnosis-related-group (DRG) system - 5 year cost data analysis of the German Society of Gastroenterology project].

Authors:  Markus Rathmayer; Wolfgang Heinlein; Claudia Reiß; Jörg G Albert; Bora Akoglu; Martin Braun; Thorsten Brechmann; Stefan K Gölder; Tim Lankisch; Helmut Messmann; Arne Schneider; Martin Wagner; Markus Dollhopf; Felix Gundling; Michael Röhling; Cornelie Haag; Ines Dohle; Sven Werner; Frank Lammert; Steffen Fleßa; Michael H Wilke; Wolfgang Schepp; Markus M Lerch
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Use of Doppler Probe in Nonvariceal Upper-Gastrointestinal Bleeding Is Less Costly and More Effective Than Standard of Care.

Authors:  Alan N Barkun; Viviane Adam; Richard C K Wong
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Second-look endoscopy for bleeding peptic ulcer disease: a decision-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; Nan Kong
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Over-the-Scope Clips Are More Effective Than Standard Endoscopic Therapy for Patients With Recurrent Bleeding of Peptic Ulcers.

Authors:  Arthur Schmidt; Stefan Gölder; Martin Goetz; Alexander Meining; James Lau; Stefan von Delius; Markus Escher; Arthur Hoffmann; Reiner Wiest; Helmut Messmann; Thomas Kratt; Benjamin Walter; Dominik Bettinger; Karel Caca
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  [Cost of intensive care in a German hospital: cost-unit accounting based on the InEK matrix].

Authors:  J Martin; C Neurohr; M Bauer; M Weiss; A Schleppers
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Interpreting the results of cost-effectiveness studies.

Authors:  David J Cohen; Matthew R Reynolds
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing lumen-apposing metal stents with plastic stents in the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis.

Authors:  Yen-I Chen; Alan N Barkun; Viviane Adam; Ge Bai; Vikesh K Singh; Majidah Bukhari; Olaya Brewer Gutierrez; B Joseph Elmunzer; Robert Moran; Lea Fayad; Mohamad El Zein; Vivek Kumbhari; Alessandro Repici; Mouen A Khashab
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Hemostasis Techniques for Non-variceal Upper GI Hemorrhage: Beyond Injection and Cautery.

Authors:  B Nulsen; D M Jensen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.487

2.  Endoscopic full-thickness resection and its treatment alternatives in difficult-to-treat lesions of the lower gastrointestinal tract: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Armin Kuellmer; Juliane Behn; Torsten Beyna; Brigitte Schumacher; Alexander Meining; Helmut Messmann; Horst Neuhaus; David Albers; Michael Birk; Andreas Probst; Martin Faehndrich; Thomas Frieling; Martin Goetz; Robert Thimme; Karel Caca; Arthur Schmidt
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.