Literature DB >> 18389191

[Cost of intensive care in a German hospital: cost-unit accounting based on the InEK matrix].

J Martin1, C Neurohr, M Bauer, M Weiss, A Schleppers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the actual cost per intensive care unit (ICU) day in Germany based on routine data from an electronic patient data management system as well as analysis of cost-driving factors. A differentiation between days with and without mechanical ventilation was performed.
METHODS: On the ICU of a German focused-care hospital (896 beds, 12 anesthesiology ICU beds), cost per treatment day was calculated with or without mechanical ventilation from the perspective of the hospital. Costs were derived retrospectively with respect to the period between January and October 2006 by cost-unit accounting based on routine data collected from the ICU patients. Patients with a length of stay of at least 2 days on the ICU were included. Demographic, clinical and economical data were analyzed for patient characterization.
RESULTS: Data of 407 patients (217 male and 190 female) were included in the analysis, of which 159 patients (100 male, 59 female) were completely or partially mechanically ventilated. The mean simplified acute physiology (SAPS) II score at the onset of ICU stay was 28.2. Average cost per ICU day was 1,265 EUR and costs for ICU days with and without mechanical ventilation amounted to 1,426 EUR and 1,145 EUR, respectively. Personnel costs (50%) showed the largest cost share followed by drugs plus medicinal products (18%) and infrastructure (16%).
CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, a cost analysis of intensive care in Germany was performed with routine data based on the matrix of the institute for reimbursement in hospitals (InEK). The results revealed a higher resource use on the ICU than previously expected. The large share of personnel costs on the ICU was evident but is comparable to other medical departments in the hospital. The need for mechanical ventilation increases the daily costs of resources by approximately 25%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18389191     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-008-1353-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  21 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis in health care.

Authors:  D B Chalfin
Journal:  Hosp Cost Manag Account       Date:  1995-07

2.  A new method of accurately identifying costs of individual patients in intensive care: the initial results.

Authors:  D L Edbrooke; V G Stevens; C L Hibbert; A J Mann; A J Wilson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  [Economic aspects of intensive care medicine--cost and reimbursement according to diagnosis related grouping].

Authors:  A Billing; M Thalhammer; H-J Eissner; K-W Jauch; D Inthorn
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.942

4.  Economic analysis of the intensive care unit: a dilemma.

Authors:  R C Bone
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Federal and nationwide intensive care units and healthcare costs: 1986-1992.

Authors:  N A Halpern; L Bettes; R Greenstein
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Unit costs of inpatient hospital days.

Authors:  Jan B Oostenbrink; Tineke Buijs-Van der Woude; Michel van Agthoven; Marc A Koopmanschap; Frans F H Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Cost calculation and prediction in adult intensive care: a ground-up utilization study.

Authors:  J L Moran; A R Peisach; P J Solomon; J Martin
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.669

8.  [Treatment costs in a medical intensive care unit: a comparison of 1992 and 1997].

Authors:  H Klepzig; G Winten; C Thierolf; G Kiesling; K H Usadel; A M Zeiher
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1998-06-05       Impact factor: 0.628

9.  A new concept for DRG-based reimbursement of services in German intensive care units: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Aileen R Neilson; Onnen Moerer; Hilmar Burchardi; Heinz Schneider
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Differences in one-year health outcomes and resource utilization by definition of prolonged mechanical ventilation: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christopher E Cox; Shannon S Carson; Jennifer H Lindquist; Maren K Olsen; Joseph A Govert; Lakshmipathi Chelluri
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  14 in total

1.  [Cross sectional study of structural quality of German intensive care units. A reevaluation of the DIVI register].

Authors:  C Fölsch; N Kofahl; C Waydhas; R Stiletto
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of Patient Blood Management.

Authors:  Adina Kleinerüschkamp; Patrick Meybohm; Niels Straub; Kai Zacharowski; Suma Choorapoikayil
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Over-the-scope clips are cost-effective in recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  Armin Kuellmer; Juliane Behn; Benjamin Meier; Andreas Wannhoff; Dominik Bettinger; Robert Thimme; Karel Caca; Arthur Schmidt
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 4.  Economics of ICU organization and management.

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch; Hayley Gershengorn; Damon C Scales
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  [Economic impact of infected total hip arthroplasty in the German diagnosis-related groups system].

Authors:  M Haenle; C Skripitz; W Mittelmeier; R Skripitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [Leipzig fast-track protocol for cardio-anesthesia. Effective, safe and economical].

Authors:  D Häntschel; J Fassl; M Scholz; M Sommer; A K Funkat; M Wittmann; J Ender
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  [Nursing workload indices TISS-10, TISS-28, and NEMS : Higher workload with agitation and delirium is not reflected].

Authors:  U Guenther; F Koegl; N Theuerkauf; J Maylahn; U Andorfer; J Weykam; T Muders; C Putensen
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 0.840

8.  Economic impact of infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maximilian Haenle; Christina Skripitz; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Ralf Skripitz
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-19

9.  General practitioners' views on polypharmacy and its consequences for patient health care.

Authors:  Juliane Köberlein; Mandy Gottschall; Kathrin Czarnecki; Alexander Thomas; Antje Bergmann; Karen Voigt
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  How is intensive care reimbursed? A review of eight European countries.

Authors:  Martin-Immanuel Bittner; Maria Donnelly; Arthur Rh van Zanten; Jakob Steen Andersen; Bertrand Guidet; Jose Javier Trujillano Cabello; Shane Gardiner; Gerard Fitzpatrick; Bob Winter; Michael Joannidis; Axel Schmutz
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 6.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.