Literature DB >> 31700213

Anatomical fitting of a plate shape directly derived from a 3D statistical bone model of the tibia.

Beat Schmutz1, Kanchana Rathnayaka2, Thomas Albrecht3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intra- and inter-population variations of bone morphology have made the process of designing an anatomically well-fitting fracture fixation plate challenging. Although statistical bone models have recently been used for analysing morphological variabilities, it is not known to what extent they would also provide the basis for the design of a new plate shape. This would be particularly valuable in the case where no existing plate shape is available to start the process of fit optimisation. Therefore, this study investigated the anatomical fitting of a plate shape (statistical plate) derived from the mean shape of a statistical 3D tibia bone model in comparison to results available from two other plate shapes.
METHODS: Forty-five 3D bone models of tibiae from Japanese cadaver specimens, as well as 3D models of the plate undersurface of both a commercial and shape optimised Medial Distal Tibia Plate, were utilised from earlier studies. The mean shape of the 3D statistical bone model was generated from the tibia models utilising the Statismo framework. With reverse engineering software, the plate undersurface of the statistical plate shape was derived directly from the mean surface of the statistical 3D bone model. Through an iterative process, the statistical plate model was placed at the correct surgical position on each bone model for fit assessment.
RESULTS: The statistical plate was fitting for 20% of the tibiae compared to 13% for the commercial and 67% for the optimised plate, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The plate shape derived directly from a statistical bone model was fitting better than the commercial plate, but considerably inferior to that of an optimised plate. However, the results do clearly indicate that this approach provides an appropriate and solid basis for commencing shape optimisation of the statistical plate. Studies of other anatomical regions are required to confirm whether these findings can be generalised.
© 2019 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fracture fixation; Orthopaedic plates; Plate fit; Statistical model; Tibia

Year:  2019        PMID: 31700213      PMCID: PMC6823809          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  26 in total

1.  Optimisation of orthopaedic implant design using statistical shape space analysis based on level sets.

Authors:  Nina Kozic; Stefan Weber; Philippe Büchler; Christian Lutz; Nils Reimers; Miguel A González Ballester; Mauricio Reyes
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Fit assessment of anatomic plates for the distal medial tibia.

Authors:  Beat Schmutz; Martin E Wullschleger; Henry Kim; Hansrudi Noser; Michael A Schütz
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  New Design Process for Anatomically Enhanced Osteosynthesis Plates.

Authors:  Luisa Tkany; Bernhard Hofstätter; Andreas Petersik; Jörg Miehling; Sandro Wartzack; Stefan Sesselmann
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  A CT database for research, development and education: concept and potential.

Authors:  Peter Messmer; Felix Matthews; Augustinus Ludwig Jacob; Ron Kikinis; Pietro Regazzoni; Hansruedi Noser
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Predictive statistical models of baseline variations in 3-D femoral cortex morphology.

Authors:  Ju Zhang; Jacqui Hislop-Jambrich; Thor F Besier
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Automatic segmentation of mandibular canal in cone beam CT images using conditional statistical shape model and fast marching.

Authors:  Fatemeh Abdolali; Reza Aghaeizadeh Zoroofi; Maryam Abdolali; Futoshi Yokota; Yoshito Otake; Yoshinobu Sato
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  A prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing tibial nailing using fracture table traction versus manual traction.

Authors:  M D McKee; E H Schemitsch; J P Waddell; D Yoo
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Exploring inter-subject anatomic variability using a population of patient-specific femurs and a statistical shape and intensity model.

Authors:  Mamadou T Bah; Junfen Shi; Martin Browne; Yanneck Suchier; Fabien Lefebvre; Philippe Young; Leonard King; Doug G Dunlop; Markus O Heller
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.242

9.  Three dimensional measurement of minimum joint space width in the knee from stereo radiographs using statistical shape models.

Authors:  E A van IJsseldijk; E R Valstar; B C Stoel; R G H H Nelissen; N Baka; R Van't Klooster; B L Kaptein
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Non-linear scaling of a musculoskeletal model of the lower limb using statistical shape models.

Authors:  Daniel Nolte; Chui Kit Tsang; Kai Yu Zhang; Ziyun Ding; Angela E Kedgley; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  3 in total

1.  Convenient design method for customized implants based on bionic vein structure features.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Weizhong Geng; Kunjin He; Kaijin Guo
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-12

2.  Analyzing the Fitting of Novel Preformed Osteosynthesis Plates for the Reduction and Fixation of Mandibular Fractures.

Authors:  Marc Anton Fuessinger; Mathieu Gass; Caroline Woelm; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Ruediger M Zimmerer; Philipp Poxleitner; Stefan Schlager; Marc Christian Metzger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Bone morphological feature extraction for customized bone plate design.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Kaijin Guo; Kunjin He; Hong Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.