| Literature DB >> 31700100 |
Ken Nakatani1, Mayumi Ueta2, Seik-Soon Khor1, Yuki Hitomi1, Yuko Okudaira3, Anri Masuya3, Yuki Wada4, Chie Sotozono5, Shigeru Kinoshita6, Hidetoshi Inoko3, Katsushi Tokunaga7.
Abstract
Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening acute inflammatory vesiculobullous reactions of the skin and mucous membranes. These severe cutaneous drug reactions are known to be caused by inciting drugs and infectious agents. Previously, we have reported the association of HLA-A*02:06 and HLA-B*44:03 with cold medicine (CM)-related SJS/TEN with severe ocular complications (SOCs) in the Japanese population. However, the conventional HLA typing method (PCR-SSOP) sometimes has ambiguity in the final HLA allele determination. In this study, we performed HLA-disease association studies in CM-SJS/TEN with SOCs at 3- or 4-field level. 120 CM-SJS/TEN patients with SOCs and 817 Japanese healthy controls are HLA genotyped using the high-resolution next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based HLA typing of HLA class I genes, including HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C. Among the alleles of HLA class I genes, HLA-A*02:06:01 was strongly associated with susceptibility to CM-SJS/TEN (p = 1.15 × 10-18, odds ratio = 5.46). Four other alleles (HLA-A*24:02:01, HLA-B*52:01:01, HLA-B*46:01:01, and HLA-C*12:02:02) also demonstrated significant associations. HLA haplotype analyses indicated that HLA-A*02:06:01 is primarily associated with susceptibility to CM-SJS/TEN with SOCs. Notably, there were no specific disease-causing rare variants among the high-risk HLA alleles. This study highlights the importance of higher resolution HLA typing in the study of disease susceptibility, which may help to elucidate the pathogenesis of CM-SJS/TEN with SOCs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31700100 PMCID: PMC6838058 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52619-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characterization of HLA class I alleles determined by NGS-based HLA typing of 937 samples.
| Locus | Number of HLA alleles (2-field) | Number of HLA alleles (3-field) | Number of detected novel allele (3-field) | Novel alleles/all alleles | Number of detected null alleles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 22 | 23 | 1 | 0.053% | 1 |
| B | 42 | 47 | 1 | 0.053% | 0 |
| C | 21 | 25 | 2 | 0.11% | 0 |
| total | 85 | 95 | 4 | 0.21% | 1 |
Number of HLA class I alleles subdivided into multiple 3-field-level alleles (2n = 1,874).
| HLA alleles (2-field) | Number of HLA alleles (2-field) | HLA alleles (3-field) | Number of HLA alleles (3-field) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 159 |
| 1 |
|
| 158 | ||
|
| 77 |
| 31 |
|
| 46 | ||
|
| 5 |
| 4 |
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 176 |
| 175 |
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 57 |
| 56 |
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 19 |
| 16 |
|
| 3 | ||
|
| 241 |
| 239 |
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 238 |
| 237 |
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 176 |
| 175 |
|
| 1 |
Discordance between NGS typing and Luminex typing results (SJS: n = 105, controls: n = 752).
| NGS typing | PCR-SSOP (Luminex) typing | N | Discordant base position | Luminex probe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 1 | Exon 4 (1 base) | out of target |
|
|
| 1 | Exon 2 (2 bases) | ✓(Typing error) |
|
|
| 1 | Exon 4 (1 base) | out of target |
|
|
| 1 | Exon 3 (2 bases) | no probe |
|
|
| 14 | Exon 5 (9 bases) | out of target |
|
|
| 1 | Exon 5,6 (6 bases) | out of target |
|
|
| 7 | Exon 6 (1 base) | out of target |
Abbreviations: PCR-SSOP, polymerase chain reaction sequence specific oligonucleotide probing; NGS, next generation sequencing.
Discordant base position between NGS typing and Luminex typing is shown with the number of bases. “out of target” means the Luminex probe doesn’t cover the targeted reigion (exon 2 and 3). “no probe” means Luminex probe doesn’t cover the discordant base position.
“✓(Typing error)” means the Luminex probe covers the discordant base position, but can’t distinguish the difference because of some typing error.
Carrier frequencies of HLA class I alleles in CM-SJS/TEN patients and healthy controls.
| HLA alleles/haplotypes | Carrier frequency (%) | Dominant model association analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case (n = 120) (%) | Control (n = 817) (%) |
|
| Odds ratio (95%CI) | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| | 59 | (49.2%) | 123 | (15.1%) | 1.15.E-18 | 1.15.E-17 | 5.46 | (3.64–8.19) |
| | 50 | (41.7%) | 496 | (60.7%) | 7.81.E-05 | 7.81.E-04 | 0.46 | (0.31–0.68) |
|
| ||||||||
| | 21 | (17.5%) | 68 | (8.3%) | 0.0014 | 0.0246 | 2.34 | (1.37–3.98) |
| | 10 | (8.3%) | 178 | (21.8%) | 5.90.E-04 | 0.0106 | 0.33 | (0.17–0.64) |
|
| ||||||||
| | 11 | (9.2%) | 178 | (21.8%) | 0.0013 | 0.0181 | 0.36 | (0.19–0.69) |
|
| ||||||||
| | 14 | (11.7%) | 23 | (2.8%) | 7.11.E-05 | 2.28.E-03 | 4.55 | (2.1–9.55) |
| | 10 | (8.3%) | 169 | (20.7%) | 0.0013 | 0.0419 | 0.35 | (0.18–0.68) |
|
| ||||||||
| | 20 | (16.7%) | 58 | (7.1%) | 3.96.E-04 | 0.0099 | 2.62 | (1.51–4.53) |
| | 10 | (8.3%) | 175 | (21.4%) | 7.72.E-04 | 0.0193 | 0.33 | (0.17–0.65) |
|
| ||||||||
| | 12 | (10%) | 12 | (1.5%) | 8.13.E-06 | 2.19.E-04 | 7.43 | (2.97–18.57) |
| | 12 | (10%) | 23 | (2.8%) | 7.13.E-04 | 0.0193 | 3.83 | (1.68–8.29) |
| | 11 | (9.2%) | 19 | (2.3%) | 6.27.E-04 | 0.0169 | 4.23 | (1.77–9.65) |
Abbreviations: HLA, human leukocyte antigen; CM-SJS/TEN, cold medicine-related Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis; CI, Confidence interval.
HLA alleles and haplotypes with frequencies < 1% in cases and controls are excluded from the association analysis. P-corrected: P values for allele/haplotype frequency comparisons between cases and controls using the Peason’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test and then corrected for the multiplicity of testing by the number of comparisons. (10, 18, and 14 for HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C, respectively. 32, 25, and 27 for A-B, B-C, and C-A haplotype, respectively).