| Literature DB >> 31699062 |
Eskezaiw Abebe1, Abdu Seid2, Getnet Gedefaw2, Zelalem T Haile3, Gillian Ice4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Globally, the magnitude of maternal mortality is the major public health problem. Nearly all (99%) of maternal deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Of which 66% occur in sub-Saharan Africa. Institutional delivery under the hygienic environment with the necessary skills and equipment promotes to identify and treat complications, infections, and the death of the mother and baby. In Ethiopia, the utilization of maternal health services is very low. For instance, 62% of women had antenatal care utilization during pregnancy while only 26% of women utilize institutions for delivery in 2016. Therefore, this study examined the association between antenatal care follow up and intestinal delivery among a nationally representative woman in Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Antenatal care; EDHS; Ethiopia; Institutional delivery
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31699062 PMCID: PMC6839186 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7854-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Schematic presentation of selecting sample from EDHS 2016 data
Characteristics of study sample and the status of institutional delivery service utilization(n = 7575)
| Variable | Number (%) | Institutional delivery | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||
| Age | ||||
| 13–19 | 8,35 (11.0) | 84 (10.1) | 751 (89.9) | < 0.001 |
| 20–34 | 5415 (71.5) | 676 (12.5) | 4739 (87.5) | |
| 35–49 | 1325 (17.5) | 97 (7.3) | 1228 (92.7) | |
| Residence | ||||
| Urban | 9,64 (12.7) | 404 (41.8) | 559 (58.2) | < 0.001 |
| Rural | 6611 (87.3) | 453 (6.9) | 6159 (93.1) | |
| Educational level | ||||
| No education | 4780 (63.1) | 264 (5.5) | 4516 (94.3) | < 0.001 |
| Primary | 2147 (28.3) | 290 (13.5) | 1857 (86.5) | |
| Secondary or Higher | 648 (8.6) | 303 (46.8) | 345 (53.2) | |
| Marital status | ||||
| Never married | 56 (0.7) | 17 (30.4) | 39 (69.4) | 0.004 |
| Married | 7097 (93.7) | 779 (11.0) | 6318 (89.0) | |
| Not currently married | 422 (5.6) | 362 (85.8) | 60 (14.2) | |
| Exposed to media | ||||
| No exposed | 6094 (80.4) | 456 (7.5) | 5638 (92.5) | < 0.001 |
| Exposed | 1481 (19.6) | 401 (27.1) | 1080 (72.9) | |
| Perceived distance from a nearby health facility | ||||
| Big problem | 4402 (58.1) | 295 (6.7) | 4107 (93.3) | < 0.001 |
| No big problem | 3173 (41.9) | 562 (17.7) | 2611 (82.3) | |
| History of ANC follow up | ||||
| No | 2818 (37.2) | 82 (2.9) | 2736 (97.1) | < 0.001 |
| 1–3 | 2342 (30.9) | 246 (10.5) | 2096 (89.5) | |
| 4+ | 2415 (31.9) | 529 (21.9) | 1886 (78.1) | |
| Household wealth index | ||||
| Poorest | 1648 (21.8) | 60 (3.6) | 1588 (96.4) | < 0.001 |
| Poorer | 1654 (21.8) | 107 (6.5) | 1547 (93.5) | |
| Middle | 1585 (20.9) | 1470 (92.7) | 115 (7.3) | |
| Richer | 1426 (18.8) | 130 (9.1) | 1296 (90.9) | |
| Richest | 1262 (16.7) | 444 (35.2) | 818 (64.8) | |
| Birth order | ||||
| 1 | 1431 (18.9) | 311 (21.7) | 1120 (78.3) | < 0.001 |
| 2–4 | 3183 (42.0) | 371 (11.7) | 2811 (88.3) | |
| 5+ | 2961 (39.1) | 176 (5.9) | 2785 (94.1) | |
| Wantedness of the recent birth | ||||
| Wanted then | 5563 (74.3) | 671 (12.1) | 4892 (87.9) | 0.043 |
| Wanted later | 1317 (17.9) | 128 (9.7) | 1188 (90.7) | |
| Wanted no more | 695 (9.2) | 58 (8.3) | 637 (91.7) | |
aRao-Scott chi-square p-value
Association between antenatal care follow-up and institutional delivery service utilization(n = 7193)
| Variable | Institutional Delivery | |
|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted OR | Adjusted OR | |
| Age | ||
| 13–19 | 1.42 (0.96,2.10) | 0.76 (0.44,1.33) |
| 20–34 | 1.81 (1.35,2.45) | 1.10 (0.73,1.66) |
| 35–49 | Ref | Ref |
| Residence | ||
| Urban | 9.84 (6.98,13.86) | 2.25 (1.44,3.51)** |
| Rural | Ref | Ref |
| Educational level | ||
| No education | Ref | Ref |
| Primary | 2.71 (2.05,3.50) | 3.22 (2.09,4.98)** |
| Secondary and Higher | 9.73 (6.51,14.01) | 1.59 (1.16,2.17)* |
| Marital status | ||
| Never married | 2.64 (0.94,7.38) | 1.66 (0.36,7.61) |
| Married | 0.74 (0.52,1.06) | 0.68 (0.44,1.07) |
| Currently not married | Ref | Ref |
| Exposed to media | ||
| Yes | 4.60 (3.52,6.02) | 0.88 (0.63,1.23) |
| No | Ref | Ref |
| Perceived distance from health facility | ||
| Big problem | Ref | Ref |
| No big problem | 3.00 (2.30,3.90) | 1.28 (0.98,1.67) |
| History of ANC follow up | ||
| No | Ref | Ref |
| 1–3 | 3.90 (2.60,5.85) | 2.49 (1.66,3.74) ** |
| 4+ | 9.32 (6.30,13.80) | 3.90 (2.60,5.84)** |
| Birth order | ||
| 1 | 4.39 (3.33,5.80) | 1.47 (0.98,2.20) |
| 2–4 | 2.09 (1.59,2.74) | 0.98 (0.70,1.36) |
| 5+ | Ref | Ref |
| Household wealth index | ||
| Poorest | Ref | Ref |
| Poorer | 1.84 (1.19,2.85) | 2.57 (1.57,4.20)** |
| Middle | 2.08 (1.34,3.21) | 1.63 (1.05,2.52)* |
| Richer | 2.66 (1.71,4.13) | 1.56 (1.03,2,58)* |
| Richest | 14.41 (9.56,21.71) | 1.6 (0.99,2.45) |
| Wantedness of the recent birth | ||
| Wanted then | 1.52 (1.04,2.25) | 1.01 (0.66,1.55) |
| Wanted later | 1.19 (0.75,1.91) | 0.72 (0.44,1.74) |
| Wanted more | Ref | Ref |
*p-value less than 0.005 **p-value less than 0.001