| Literature DB >> 28742809 |
Priyanka Dixit1, Junaid Khan2, Laxmi Kant Dwivedi2, Amrita Gupta1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A number of studies have assessed the effectiveness of antenatal care (ANC) on uptake of institutional delivery care. However, none address the issue of association between the different components of ANC i.e. ANC component which is independent of health care delivery systems (timing and number of ANC visits), ANC components which depends on health care delivery systems (specific ANC procedures that women receive) with institutional delivery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28742809 PMCID: PMC5526542 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181793
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
DHS surveys included in the study.
| Country | Survey Years | |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1998–99 | 2005–06 |
| Nepal | 2006 | 2011 |
| Pakistan | 2006–07 | 2012–13 |
| Bangladesh | 2004 | 2007 |
| Indonesia | 2007 | 2012 |
| Philippines | 2003 | 2008 |
Percentage distributions of three or more ANC visits, ANC visits at 1st trimester and institutional delivery for the study countries.
| Country/ Year | ANC visit | Total | 1st ANC | Total | Institutional | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3+ visits | 1st trimester | delivery | ||||
| Bangladesh-2004 | 27.1 | 5,416 | 19.5 | 5,416 | 10.9 | 5,416 |
| Bangladesh-2007 | 31.5 | 4,905 | 24.3 | 4,905 | 16.4 | 4,905 |
| Pakistan-2006-07 | 40.1 | 5,677 | 30.6 | 5,677 | 37.0 | 5,677 |
| Pakistan-2012-13 | 49.0 | 7,447 | 42.4 | 7,447 | 51.6 | 7,447 |
| Nepal-2006 | 49.3 | 4,066 | 27.7 | 4,066 | 19.4 | 4,066 |
| Nepal-2011 | 66.5 | 4,148 | 49.7 | 4,148 | 38.5 | 4,148 |
| India-1998-99 | 44.2 | 28,779 | 33.0 | 28,779 | 33.9 | 28,779 |
| India-2005-06 | 52.8 | 39,677 | 43.9 | 39,677 | 41.7 | 39,677 |
| Indonesia-2007 | 89.1 | 14,042 | 75.1 | 14,042 | 48.0 | 14,042 |
| Indonesia-2012 | 93.3 | 14,782 | 80.4 | 14,782 | 64.4 | 14,782 |
| Philippines-2003 | 83.8 | 4,802 | 53.2 | 4,802 | 40.1 | 4,802 |
| Philippines-2008 | 87.7 | 4,590 | 54.0 | 4,590 | 46.7 | 4,590 |
Percentages of institutional delivery according to the dimensions of ANC.
| Country, Year, | Factor | Place of delivery (%) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Institutional | |||
| <3 visits® | 95.2 | 4.8 | 3,775 | |
| 3+ visits | 72.6 | 27.4 | 1,591 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0® | 96.5 | 3.5 | 3,678 | |
| Level-3 = 1 | 70.9 | 29.1 | 1,688 | |
| <3 visits® | 93.7 | 6.3 | 3,238 | |
| 3+ visits | 61.7 | 38.3 | 1,688 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0® | 91.0 | 9.0 | 4,145 | |
| Level-3 = 1 | 38.0 | 62.0 | 781 | |
| <3 visits® | 79.9 | 20.1 | 3,481 | |
| 3+ visits | 37.7 | 62.3 | 2,243 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0® | 74.1 | 25.9 | 4,511 | |
| Level-3 = 1 | 24.5 | 75.5 | 1,213 | |
| <3 visits® | 68.9 | 31.1 | 3,654 | |
| 3+ visits | 27.1 | 72.9 | 3,807 | |
| Level-1 = 0® | 69.0 | 31.0 | 3,884 | |
| Level-2 = 1 | 22.8 | 77.2 | 3,577 | |
| <3 visits® | 93.5 | 6.5 | 2,174 | |
| 3+ visits | 67.3 | 32.7 | 2,008 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0® | 90.8 | 9.2 | 3,201 | |
| Level-3 = 1 | 47.7 | 52.3 | 981 | |
| <3 visits® | 86.0 | 14.0 | 1,271 | |
| 3+ visits | 49.1 | 50.9 | 2,808 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0® | 77.3 | 22.7 | 2,570 | |
| Level-3 = 1 | 35.2 | 64.8 | 1,509 | |
| <3 visits® | 86.3 | 13.7 | 15,683 | |
| 3+ visits | 40.6 | 59.4 | 13,295 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0® | 78.2 | 21.8 | 22,800 | |
| Level-3 = 1 | 22.9 | 70.1 | 6,178 | |
Percentages of institutional delivery according to the dimensions of ANC.
| Country, Year, Dimensions of ANC | Factor | Place of delivery (%) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Institutional | |||
| <3 visits | 83.0 | 17.0 | 14,457 | |
| 3+ visits | 36.3 | 63.7 | 22,393 | |
| Level-1 = 0 | 71.0 | 29.0 | 15,103 | |
| Level-2 = 1 | 20.4 | 79.6 | 14,931 | |
| <3 visits | 83.3 | 16.7 | 2,108 | |
| 3+ visits | 48.2 | 52.8 | 13,266 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0 | 60.3 | 39.7 | 11,162 | |
| Level-3 = 1 | 32.1 | 67.9 | 4,172 | |
| <3 visits | 80.4 | 19.6 | 1,441 | |
| 3+ visits | 32.4 | 67.6 | 13,821 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0 | 42.1 | 57.9 | 10,445 | |
| Level-3 = 1 | 23.8 | 76.2 | 4,817 | |
| <3 visits | 84.4 | 15.6 | 823 | |
| 3+ visits | 55.1 | 48.9 | 4,097 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0 | 71.4 | 28.6 | 3,489 | |
| Level-3 = 1 | 33.8 | 66.2 | 1,431 | |
| <3 visits | 79.3 | 20.7 | 624 | |
| 3+ visits | 49.6 | 50.4 | 4,088 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0 | 65.6 | 34.4 | 3,206 | |
| Level-3 = 1 | 30.4 | 69.6 | 1,506 | |
® denotes the reference category
Probit and biprobit estimation for institutional delivery.
| Probit model | Biprobit model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institutional delivery | Factor | Coef. | Predicted probability | Coef. | Predicted probability | Behaviour of rho |
| <3 visits | 0.05 | 0.09 | ||||
| 3+ visits | 0.55 | 0.28 | 0.53 | 0.18 | rho = 0 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0 | 0.04 | 0.07 | ||||
| Level-3 = 1 | 0.76 | 0.29 | 0.75 | 0.20 | rho = 0 | |
| <3 visits | 0.06 | 0.17 | rho<0 | |||
| 3+ visits | 0.73 | 0.38 | 1.09 | 0.25 | -0.259 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0 | 0.09 | 0.14 | rho<0 | |||
| Level-3 = 1 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 1.69 | 0.32 | -0.424 | |
| <3 visits | 0.21 | 0.27 | rho<0 | |||
| 3+ visits | 0.74 | 0.62 | 0.92 | 0.50 | -0.129 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0 | 0.26 | 0.31 | rho<0 | |||
| Level-3 = 1 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 1.49 | 0.53 | -0.44 | |
| <3 visits | 0.29 | 0.42 | rho<0 | |||
| 3+ visits | 0.84 | 0.75 | 1.16 | 0.66 | -0.246 | |
| Level-1 = 0 | 0.30 | 0.41 | rho<0 | |||
| Level-2 = 1 | 0.89 | 0.78 | 1.47 | 0.68 | -0.402 | |
| <3 visits | 0.06 | 0.14 | rho<0 | |||
| 3+ visits | 0.6 | 0.31 | 1.24 | 0.22 | -0.437 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0 | 0.08 | 0.14 | rho<0 | |||
| Level-3 = 1 | 0.72 | 0.51 | 1.38 | 0.27 | -0.409 | |
| <3 visits | 0.14 | 0.29 | rho<0 | |||
| 3+ visits | 0.67 | 0.51 | 1.06 | 0.44 | -0.277 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0 | 0.23 | 0.33 | rho<0 | |||
| Level-3 = 1 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 1.35 | 0.50 | -0.457 | |
Significance at
* p<0.05
** p<0.01
*** p<0.001
® denotes the reference category
Probit and biprobit estimation for institutional delivery.
| Institutional delivery | Factor | Probit model Coef. | Predicted probability | Biprobit model Coef. | Predicted probability | Behaviour of rho |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <3 visits® | 0.13 | 0.25 | rho<0 | |||
| 3+ visits | 0.82 | 0.58 | 1.09 | 0.46 | -0.193 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0® | 0.21 | 0.30 | rho<0 | |||
| Level-3 = 1 | 0.88 | 0.76 | 1.40 | 0.52 | -0.322 | |
| <3 visits® | 0.16 | 0.35 | rho<0 | |||
| 3+ visits | 0.81 | 0.63 | 1.07 | 0.56 | -0.187 | |
| Level-1 = 0® | 0.28 | 0.40 | rho<0 | |||
| Level-2 = 1 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 1.48 | 0.66 | -0.385 | |
| <3 visits® | 0.14 | 0.36 | rho<0 | |||
| 3+ visits | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.83 | 0.43 | -0.252 | |
| Level-1,2 = 0® | 0.36 | 0.38 | rho<0 | |||
| Level-3 = 1 | 0.41 | 0.64 | 1.16 | 0.49 | -0.465 | |
| <3 visits® | 0.19 | 0.42 | rho<0 | |||
| 3+ visits | 0.72 | 0.64 | 1.08 | 0.57 | -0.239 | |
| Level -1,2 = 0® | 0.53 | 0.52 | rho<0 | |||
| Level -3 = 1 | 0.40 | 0.75 | 1.12 | 0.63 | -0.46 | |
| <3 visits® | 0.16 | 0.29 | ||||
| 3+ visits | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.39 | rho = 0 | |
| Level -1,2 = 0® | 0.28 | 0.33 | ||||
| Level -3 = 1 | 0.49 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.47 | rho = 0 | |
| <3 visits® | 0.21 | 0.37 | ||||
| 3+ visits | 0.38 | 0.51 | 0.67 | 0.45 | rho = 0 | |
| Level -1,2 = 0® | 0.34 | 0.39 | ||||
| Level -3 = 1 | 0.52 | 0.71 | 0.82 | 0.54 | rho = 0 |
Significance at
* p<0.05
** p<0.01
*** p<0.001
® denotes the reference category