Literature DB >> 31697353

Is the European Health Interview Survey online yet? Response and net sample composition of a web-based data collection.

Elise Braekman1,2, Rana Charafeddine1, Stefaan Demarest1, Sabine Drieskens1, Jean Tafforeau1, Johan Van der Heyden1, Guido Van Hal2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) provides cross-national data on health status, health care and health determinants. So far, 10 of the 30 member states (MS) opted for web-based questionnaires within mixed-mode designs but none used it as the sole mode. In the context of future EHIS, the response rate and net sample composition of a web-only approach was tested.
METHODS: A Belgian study with a target sample size of 1000 (age: 16-85) was organized using the EHIS wave 3 model questionnaire. The sample was selected according to a multistage, clustered sampling procedure with geographical stratification. Field substitution was applied; non-participating households were replaced by similar households regarding statistical sector, sex and age. There was one reminder letter and a €10 conditional incentive.
RESULTS: Considering all substitutions, a 16% response rate was obtained after sending one reminder. Elderly, Brussels Capital inhabitants, people living without a partner and those with a non-Belgian nationality were less responding. By design, there were no differences between the initial and final net sample regarding substitution characteristics. Nevertheless, people living without a partner, non-Belgians and lower educated people remain underrepresented.
CONCLUSION: There was a low response rate, particularly for some population groups. The response rate was lower than those of MS using mixed-mode designs including web, especially these comprising interviewer-based approaches. Despite the long and complex questionnaire, there was a low break off rate. So far, web-only data collection is not an acceptable strategy for population-based health surveys but efforts to increase the response should be further explored.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31697353     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  5 in total

1.  Comparing web-based versus face-to-face and paper-and-pencil questionnaire data collected through two Belgian health surveys.

Authors:  Elise Braekman; Rana Charafeddine; Stefaan Demarest; Sabine Drieskens; Finaba Berete; Lydia Gisle; Johan Van der Heyden; Guido Van Hal
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Organizing the health interview survey at the local level: design of a pilot study.

Authors:  Lize Hermans; Elise Braekman; Sabine Drieskens; Stefaan Demarest
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  Unit Response and Costs in Web Versus Face-To-Face Data Collection: Comparison of Two Cross-sectional Health Surveys.

Authors:  Elise Braekman; Stefaan Demarest; Rana Charafeddine; Sabine Drieskens; Finaba Berete; Lydia Gisle; Johan Van der Heyden; Guido Van Hal
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Opportunities for a population-based cohort in Belgium.

Authors:  Nienke Schutte; Marlies Saelaert; Petronille Bogaert; Karin De Ridder; Herman Van Oyen; Johan Van der Heyden; Brecht Devleesschauwer
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2022-08-11

5.  Mixing mixed-mode designs in a national health interview survey: a pilot study to assess the impact on the self-administered questionnaire non-response.

Authors:  Elise Braekman; Sabine Drieskens; Rana Charafeddine; Stefaan Demarest; Finaba Berete; Lydia Gisle; Jean Tafforeau; Johan Van der Heyden; Guido Van Hal
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.