Literature DB >> 31696391

Zero-heat-flux core temperature monitoring system: an observational secondary analysis to evaluate agreement with naso-/oropharyngeal probe during anesthesia.

Nicholas West1, Erin Cooke1,2, Dan Morse3, Richard N Merchant1,4, Matthias Görges5,6.   

Abstract

General anesthesia impairs thermoregulation and contributes to perioperative hypothermia; core body temperature monitoring is recommended during surgical procedures lasting > 30 min. Zero-heat-flux core body temperature measurement systems enable continuous non-invasive perioperative monitoring. During a previous trial evaluating the benefits of preoperative forced-air warming, intraoperative temperatures were measured with both a zero-heat-flux sensor and a standard naso-/oropharyngeal temperature probe. The aim of this secondary analysis is to evaluate their agreement. ASA I-III patients, scheduled for elective, non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia, were enrolled. A zero-heat-flux sensor was placed on the participant's forehead preoperatively. Following induction of anesthesia, a "clinical" temperature probe was placed in the nasopharynx or oropharynx at the anesthesiologist's discretion. Temperature measurements from both sensors were recorded every 10 s. Agreement was analyzed using the Bland-Altman method, corrected for repeated measurements, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, and compared with existing studies. Data were collected in 194 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 60 (49-69) years, during surgical procedures lasting 120 (89-185) min. The zero-heat-flux measurements had a mean bias of - 0.05 °C (zero-heat-flux lower) with 95% limits of agreement within - 0.68 to + 0.58 °C. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.823. The zero-heat-flux sensor demonstrated moderate agreement with the naso-/oropharyngeal temperature probe, which was not fully within the generally accepted ± 0.5 °C limit. This is consistent with previous studies. The zero-heat-flux system offers clinical utility for non-invasive and continuous core body temperature monitoring throughout the perioperative period using a single sensor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Core body temperature; Perioperative monitoring; Temperature monitoring

Year:  2019        PMID: 31696391     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00411-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  4 in total

1.  Determining the accuracy of zero-flux and ingestible thermometers in the peri-operative setting.

Authors:  James M Jack; Helen Ellicott; Christopher I Jones; Stephen A Bremner; Ian Densham; C Mark Harper
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Intra-operative temperature monitoring with cutaneous zero-heat- flux-thermometry in comparison with oesophageal temperature: A prospective study in the paediatric population.

Authors:  Hugo Carvalho; Nadia Najafi; Jan Poelaert
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.556

3.  Brachial arterial temperature as an indicator of core temperature: proof of concept and potential applications.

Authors:  Matthew D M Pawley; Paul Martinsen; Simon J Mitchell; James F Cheeseman; Alan F Merry; Timothy Willcox; Robert Grieve; Parma Nand; Elaine Davies; Guy R Warman
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2013-06

4.  The focus of temperature monitoring with zero-heat-flux technology (3M Bair-Hugger): a clinical study with patients undergoing craniotomy.

Authors:  Eero Pesonen; Marja Silvasti-Lundell; Tomi T Niemi; Riku Kivisaari; Juha Hernesniemi; Marja-Tellervo Mäkinen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.502

  4 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy and precision of zero-heat-flux temperature measurements with the 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron Conway; Megan Bittner; Dan Phan; Kristina Chang; Navpreet Kamboj; Elizabeth Tipton; Matteo Parotto
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Development of local guidelines to prevent perioperative hypothermia in children: a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Rehena Sultana; John C Allen; Yew Nam Siow; Choon Looi Bong; Shu Ying Lee
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 6.713

3.  A Novel Non-Invasive Thermometer for Continuous Core Body Temperature: Comparison with Tympanic Temperature in an Acute Stroke Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Miloš Ajčević; Alex Buoite Stella; Giovanni Furlanis; Paola Caruso; Marcello Naccarato; Agostino Accardo; Paolo Manganotti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Intraoperative zero-heat-flux thermometry overestimates esophageal temperature by 0.26 °C: an observational study in 100 infants and young children.

Authors:  Marcus Nemeth; Marijana Lovric; Thomas Asendorf; Anselm Bräuer; Clemens Miller
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 1.977

5.  Implementation of continuous temperature monitoring during perioperative care: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Judy Munday; David Sturgess; Sabrina Oishi; Jess Bendeich; Allison Kearney; Clint Douglas
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2022-09-24

6.  Comparison of zero heat flux and double sensor thermometers during spinal anaesthesia: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Sirkka-Liisa Lauronen; Maija-Liisa Kalliomäki; Jarkko Kalliovalkama; Antti Aho; Heini Huhtala; Arvi M Yli-Hankala; Marja-Tellervo Mäkinen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 1.977

7.  Zero-Heat-Flux and Esophageal Temperature Monitoring in Orthopedic Surgery: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Judy Munday; Niall Higgins; Lee Jones; Dimitrios Vagenas; André Van Zundert; Samantha Keogh
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-07-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.