Allie Harbert1, Weston Northam2, Scott Elton2, Carolyn Quinsey3. 1. University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Carolyn_Quinsey@med.unc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Recent studies aim to reduce radiation exposure associated with computed tomography (CT) using rapid-sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We evaluated imaging modalities used for hydrocephalus and traumatic brain injury (TBI) to identify opportunities for further radiation exposure reduction. METHODS: Pediatric (≤ 18 years) patients, with either hydrocephalus or TBI receiving a head CT or head MRI from 2009 to 2017, were quantified using ICD9, ICD10, and CPT codes at a large university hospital. The odds ratios of receiving each imaging modality year-to-year and receiving a MRI or CT in a given year with each diagnosis were calculated. RESULTS: Beginning in 2015, hydrocephalus patients were more likely to receive a MRI vs CT (p < 0.0001), with likelihood increasing in the following 2 years. TBI patients were more likely to receive a CT than an MRI from 2009 to 2017. There was a smaller overall decrease in CT scans in TBI patients (p < 0.05) than hydrocephalus patients (p < 0.0001) and a larger increase in MRI use in hydrocephalus patients (p < 0.05) than TBI patients (p < 0.05) from 2009 to 2017. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CT to evaluate hydrocephalus significantly decreased over the last 3-year time period. However, CT use for TBI patients was inconsistent and did not decrease proportionally, potentially representing a belief that CT is more effective than MRI for detecting hemorrhage. There was greater use of MRI as an alternate imaging method in hydrocephalus patients than TBI patients. Head injury remains an area of improvement to decrease pediatric radiation exposure at our institution and may be an area in need of attention more broadly.
PURPOSE: Recent studies aim to reduce radiation exposure associated with computed tomography (CT) using rapid-sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We evaluated imaging modalities used for hydrocephalus and traumatic brain injury (TBI) to identify opportunities for further radiation exposure reduction. METHODS: Pediatric (≤ 18 years) patients, with either hydrocephalus or TBI receiving a head CT or head MRI from 2009 to 2017, were quantified using ICD9, ICD10, and CPT codes at a large university hospital. The odds ratios of receiving each imaging modality year-to-year and receiving a MRI or CT in a given year with each diagnosis were calculated. RESULTS: Beginning in 2015, hydrocephaluspatients were more likely to receive a MRI vs CT (p < 0.0001), with likelihood increasing in the following 2 years. TBIpatients were more likely to receive a CT than an MRI from 2009 to 2017. There was a smaller overall decrease in CT scans in TBIpatients (p < 0.05) than hydrocephaluspatients (p < 0.0001) and a larger increase in MRI use in hydrocephaluspatients (p < 0.05) than TBIpatients (p < 0.05) from 2009 to 2017. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CT to evaluate hydrocephalus significantly decreased over the last 3-year time period. However, CT use for TBIpatients was inconsistent and did not decrease proportionally, potentially representing a belief that CT is more effective than MRI for detecting hemorrhage. There was greater use of MRI as an alternate imaging method in hydrocephaluspatients than TBIpatients. Head injury remains an area of improvement to decrease pediatric radiation exposure at our institution and may be an area in need of attention more broadly.
Authors: Esther L Yue; Garth D Meckler; Ross J Fleischman; Nathan R Selden; Dianna M E Bardo; Amity K Chu O'Connor; Eugene T Vu; Rongwei Fu; David M Spiro Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Todd A Florin; Paul L Aronson; Matthew Hall; Anupam B Kharbanda; Samir S Shah; Stephen B Freedman; Elizabeth R Alpern; Rakesh D Mistry; Harold K Simon; Jay Berry; Brian D Coley; Mark I Neuman Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: David C Sheridan; Craig D Newgard; Nathan R Selden; Mubeen A Jafri; Matthew L Hansen Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Jennifer H Aldrink; Brent Adler; Jesse Haines; Daniel Watkins; Mika Matthews; Lacey Lubeley; Wei Wang; Denis R King Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Patrick R McGrew; Paul J Chestovich; Jay D Fisher; Deborah A Kuhls; Douglas R Fraser; Purvi P Patel; Chad W Katona; Syed Saquib; John J Fildes Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Rachel M Stanley; John D Hoyle; Peter S Dayan; Shireen Atabaki; Lois Lee; Kathy Lillis; Marc H Gorelick; Richard Holubkov; Michelle Miskin; James F Holmes; J Michael Dean; Nathan Kuppermann Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2014-10-05 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Patrick M Kochanek; Robert C Tasker; Nancy Carney; Annette M Totten; P David Adelson; Nathan R Selden; Cynthia Davis-O'Reilly; Erica L Hart; Michael J Bell; Susan L Bratton; Gerald A Grant; Niranjan Kissoon; Karin E Reuter-Rice; Monica S Vavilala; Mark S Wainwright Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Diana L Miglioretti; Eric Johnson; Andrew Williams; Robert T Greenlee; Sheila Weinmann; Leif I Solberg; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Douglas Roblin; Michael J Flynn; Nicholas Vanneman; Rebecca Smith-Bindman Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Mark S Pearce; Jane A Salotti; Mark P Little; Kieran McHugh; Choonsik Lee; Kwang Pyo Kim; Nicola L Howe; Cecile M Ronckers; Preetha Rajaraman; Alan W Sir Craft; Louise Parker; Amy Berrington de González Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 79.321