Literature DB >> 31695112

Potted plants do not improve indoor air quality: a review and analysis of reported VOC removal efficiencies.

Bryan E Cummings1, Michael S Waring2.   

Abstract

Potted plants have demonstrated abilities to remove airborne volatile organic compounds (VOC) in small, sealed chambers over timescales of many hours or days. Claims have subsequently been made suggesting that potted plants may reduce indoor VOC concentrations. These potted plant chamber studies reported outcomes using various metrics, often not directly applicable to contextualizing plants' impacts on indoor VOC loads. To assess potential impacts, 12 published studies of chamber experiments were reviewed, and 196 experimental results were translated into clean air delivery rates (CADR, m3/h), which is an air cleaner metric that can be normalized by volume to parameterize first-order loss indoors. The distribution of single-plant CADR spanned orders of magnitude, with a median of 0.023 m3/h, necessitating the placement of 10-1000 plants/m2 of a building's floor space for the combined VOC-removing ability by potted plants to achieve the same removal rate that outdoor-to-indoor air exchange already provides in typical buildings (~1 h-1). Future experiments should shift the focus from potted plants' (in)abilities to passively clean indoor air, and instead investigate VOC uptake mechanisms, alternative biofiltration technologies, biophilic productivity and well-being benefits, or negative impacts of other plant-sourced emissions, which must be assessed by rigorous field work accounting for important indoor processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical/statistical models; Exposure modeling; Volatile organic compounds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31695112     DOI: 10.1038/s41370-019-0175-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  27 in total

1.  Secondary organic aerosol in residences: predicting its fraction of fine particle mass and determinants of formation strength.

Authors:  M S Waring
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 2.  Indoor particles: a review.

Authors:  L Wallace
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Airway symptoms among house painters in relation to exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCS)--a longitudinal study.

Authors:  G Wieslander; D Norbäck; C Edling
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1997-04

4.  Predicting the importance of oxidative aging on indoor organic aerosol concentrations using the two-dimensional volatility basis set (2D-VBS).

Authors:  Bryan E Cummings; Michael S Waring
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 5.  Indoor aerosols: from personal exposure to risk assessment.

Authors:  L Morawska; A Afshari; G N Bae; G Buonanno; C Y H Chao; O Hänninen; W Hofmann; C Isaxon; E R Jayaratne; P Pasanen; T Salthammer; M Waring; A Wierzbicka
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 5.770

6.  Predicting secondary organic aerosol formation from terpenoid ozonolysis with varying yields in indoor environments.

Authors:  S Youssefi; M S Waring
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 5.770

7.  Characteristics and health impacts of VOCs and carbonyls associated with residential cooking activities in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Steven Sai Hang Ho; Kin Fai Ho; Shun Cheng Lee; Jian Zhen Yu; Peter K K Louie
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 10.588

8.  Transient secondary organic aerosol formation from limonene ozonolysis in indoor environments: impacts of air exchange rates and initial concentration ratios.

Authors:  Somayeh Youssefi; Michael S Waring
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Real-time transformation of outdoor aerosol components upon transport indoors measured with aerosol mass spectrometry.

Authors:  A M Johnson; M S Waring; P F DeCarlo
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 10.  Ozone's impact on public health: contributions from indoor exposures to ozone and products of ozone-initiated chemistry.

Authors:  Charles J Weschler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluating In Silico the Potential Health and Environmental Benefits of Houseplant Volatile Organic Compounds for an Emerging 'Indoor Forest Bathing' Approach.

Authors:  Valentina Roviello; Pasqualina Liana Scognamiglio; Ugo Caruso; Caterina Vicidomini; Giovanni N Roviello
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Using Ambient Scent to Enhance Well-Being in the Multisensory Built Environment.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.