Literature DB >> 24387324

Secondary organic aerosol in residences: predicting its fraction of fine particle mass and determinants of formation strength.

M S Waring1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Indoor secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation may contribute to particle concentrations within residences, but little systematic work has investigated its magnitude or the determinants of its formation. This work uses a time-averaged modeling approach to predict the indoor SOA mass formed in residences due to the oxidation of 66 reactive organic compounds by ozone or the hydroxyl radical, parameterizing SOA formation with the aerosol mass fraction. Other organic and inorganic aerosols owing to outdoor and indoor sources were also predicted. Model inputs were represented as distributions within a Monte Carlo analysis, so that result distributions and sensitivity of results to inputs could be quantified, using a dataset developed from the study of Relationships between Indoor, Outdoor and Personal Air and other sources. SOA comprised a large amount of indoor organic and total fine particles for a subset of the results (e.g., >47% of indoor organic and >30% of fine aerosol for 10% of the modeled cases), but was often a small fraction. The sensitivity analysis revealed that SOA formation is driven by high terpene emission rates (particularly by d-limonene) and outdoor ozone, along with low air exchange and ozone and particle deposition rates. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: This study predicts that indoor SOA formation can be a substantial fraction of indoor aerosols in residences, for certain combinations of building and reactant parameters. The model herein can predict SOA for risk analyses or be used to design experiments to study indoor SOA formation. The terpene, d-limonene, contributes by far the most to formation, and eliminating this particular compound indoors would be impactful on indoor aerosol concentrations.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerosol mass fraction; Hydroxyl radical; Indoor SOA; Ozone; Yield; d-Limonene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24387324     DOI: 10.1111/ina.12092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  7 in total

1.  Indoor-biofilter growth and exposure to airborne chemicals drive similar changes in plant root bacterial communities.

Authors:  Jacob A Russell; Yi Hu; Linh Chau; Margarita Pauliushchyk; Ioannis Anastopoulos; Shivanthi Anandan; Michael S Waring
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Quantification of the impact of cooking processes on indoor concentrations of volatile organic species and primary and secondary organic aerosols.

Authors:  Felix Klein; Urs Baltensperger; André S H Prévôt; Imad El Haddad
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 5.770

3.  Volatile organic compound conversion by ozone, hydroxyl radicals, and nitrate radicals in residential indoor air: Magnitudes and impacts of oxidant sources.

Authors:  Michael S Waring; J Raymond Wells
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 4.  Potted plants do not improve indoor air quality: a review and analysis of reported VOC removal efficiencies.

Authors:  Bryan E Cummings; Michael S Waring
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 5.  The Human Exposure Potential from Propylene Releases to the Environment.

Authors:  David A Morgott
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Barking up the Right Tree: Using Tree Bark to Track Airborne Particles in School Environment and Link Science to Society.

Authors:  A D S Leite; S Rousse; J-F Léon; R I F Trindade; S Haoues-Jouve; C Carvallo; M Dias-Alves; A Proietti; E Nardin; M Macouin
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2022-09-01

7.  The Association between Indoor Air Quality and Adult Blood Pressure Levels in a High-Income Setting.

Authors:  Krassi Rumchev; Mario Soares; Yun Zhao; Christopher Reid; Rachel Huxley
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.