Literature DB >> 31694057

Accuracy of Bone Resection in MAKO Total Knee Robotic-Assisted Surgery.

James D Sires1, Johnathan D Craik2, Christopher J Wilson2.   

Abstract

Accurate component positioning and planning is vital to prevent malalignment of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as malalignment is associated with an increased rate of polyethylene wear and revision arthroplasty. The MAKO total knee robotic arm-assisted surgery (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) uses a preoperative computed tomography scan of the patient's knee and three-dimensional planning to size and orientate implants prior to bone resection. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the MAKO Total Knee system in achieving the preoperative plan for bone resection and final limb coronal alignment. A series of 45 consecutive cases was performed using the MAKO Total Knee system and Triathlon Total Knee implant (Stryker) between April 2018 and May 2019. The difference between what was planned and what was achieved for bone resection and coronal limb alignment was calculated. A total of 37 patients had their data captured using the MAKO system software. Mean difference from the plan for distal femoral cuts was 0.38mm (0.32) deep/proud, anterior femoral cuts 0.44mm (0.27) deep/proud and tibial cuts 0.37mm (0.30) deep/proud. In total, 99 out of 105 (94.29%) of bone resections were within 1mm of the plan. Mean absolute difference in final limb coronal alignment was 0.78° (0.78), with 78.13% being ≤1.00° of the plan, and 100% being ≤3.00° of the plan. The accuracy in achieving preoperatively planned bone resection and final limb coronal alignment using the MAKO Total Knee system is high. Future research is planned to look at whether this is associated with decreased rates of polyethylene wear and revision arthroplasty. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31694057     DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  16 in total

1.  Better accuracy and reproducibility of a new robotically-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Ari Seidenstein; Miles Birmingham; Jared Foran; Steven Ogden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  [Market overview: Robotic-assisted arthroplasty : Current robotic systems, learning curve and cost analysis].

Authors:  Lars-René Tuecking; Max Ettinger; Henning Windhagen; Peter Savov
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-08-09

3.  Safe and effective use of active robotics for TKA: Early results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  Bernard N Stulberg; Jayson D Zadzilka; Stefan Kreuzer; Yair D Kissin; Ralph Liebelt; William J Long; Valentina Campanelli
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-23

4.  Alignment philosophy influences trochlea recreation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study using image-based robotic technology.

Authors:  Jobe Shatrov; Benoit Coulin; Cécile Batailler; Elvire Servien; Bill Walter; Sebastien Lustig
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 5.  The evolution of robotic systems for total knee arthroplasty, each system must be assessed for its own value: a systematic review of clinical evidence and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannes Vermue; Cécile Batailler; Paul Monk; Fares Haddad; Thomas Luyckx; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 2.928

6.  Comparison of patient reported outcomes after robotic versus manual total knee arthroplasty in the same patient undergoing staged bilateral knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Praharsha Mulpur; A B Suhas Masilamani; Mrinal Prakash; Adarsh Annapareddy; Kushal Hippalgaonkar; A V Gurava Reddy
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-19

7.  Robotic-arm assisted versus conventional technique for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective single centre study.

Authors:  Chenkai Li; Tao Li; Zian Zhang; Hui Huang; Chun Rong; Wanping Zhu; Haining Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.479

8.  No difference in PROMs between robotic-assisted CR versus PS total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Jarod A Richards; Mark D Williams; Neil A Gupta; Joseph M Kitchen; John E Whitaker; Langan S Smith; Arthur L Malkani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-01-08

9.  3D-surface scan based validated new measurement technique of femoral joint line reconstruction in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lars-Rene Tuecking; Max Ettinger; Dennis Nebel; Bastian Welke; Michael Schwarze; Henning Windhagen; Peter Savov
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-02-25

Review 10.  The current state of robotics in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre St Mart; En Lin Goh
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.