| Literature DB >> 35945459 |
Lars-René Tuecking1, Max Ettinger2, Henning Windhagen2, Peter Savov2.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted arthroplasty has been rapidly entering clinical routine in recent years. The leading endoprosthesis manufacturers have all meanwhile placed robotic systems on the market, which, however, differ significantly from one another technically. Current systems are currently classified according to the degree of autonomy (active vs. semi-active vs. passive) and the data/image source (image-based: CT vs. X‑ray, imageless). Some systems already offer the possibility of robotic-assisted or navigated implantation of hip endoprostheses. In the following review article, the currently leading robotic systems will be presented and compared with regard to their characteristics. Furthermore, the analysis of the learning curves for the different systems, currently available cost analysis models and an outlook on future developments and challenges will be given.Entities:
Keywords: Computer-assisted surgery; Image-guided surgery; Surgical navigation systems; Total hip replacement; Total knee replacement
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35945459 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-022-04286-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthopadie (Heidelb) ISSN: 2731-7145