Literature DB >> 31694004

Optimization of the electrode drive pattern for imaging fascicular compound action potentials in peripheral nerve with fast neural electrical impedance tomography.

Enrico Ravagli1, Svetlana Mastitskaya, Nicole Thompson, Kirill Aristovich, David Holder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to investigate which injection pattern led to the best imaging of fascicular compound activity in fast neural EIT of peripheral nerve using an external cylindrical 2  ×  14-electrodes cuff. Specifically, the study addressed the identification of the optimal injection pattern and of the optimal region of the reconstructed volume to image fascicles. APPROACH: The effect of three different measurement protocol features (transversal/longitudinal injection, drive electrode spacing, referencing configuration) over imaging was investigated in simulation with the use of realistic impedance changes and noise levels. Image-based metrics were employed to evaluate the quality of the reconstructions over the reconstruction domain. The optimal electrode addressing protocol suggested by the simulations was validated in vivo on the tibial and peroneal fascicles of rat sciatic peripheral nerves (N  =  3) against MicroCT reference images. MAIN
RESULTS: Injecting current transversally, with spacing of  ⩾4 electrodes apart (⩾100°) and single-ring referencing of measurements, led to the best overall localization when reconstructing on the edge of the electrode array closest to the reference. Longitudinal injection protocols led to a higher SNR of the reconstructed image but poorer localization. All in vivo EIT recordings had statistically significant impedance variations (p   <  0.05). Overall, fascicle center-of-mass (CoM) localization error was estimated at 141  ±  56 µm (-26  ±  94 µm and 5  ±  29° in radial coordinates). Significant difference was found (p   <  0.05) between mean angular location of the tibial and peroneal CoMs. SIGNIFICANCE: This study gives the reader recommendations for performing fast neural EIT of fascicular compound activity using the most effective protocol features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31694004      PMCID: PMC7214787          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab54eb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  30 in total

Review 1.  A cable theory based biophysical model of resistance change in crab peripheral nerve and human cerebral cortex during neuronal depolarisation: implications for electrical impedance tomography of fast neural activity in the brain.

Authors:  Adam Liston; Richard Bayford; David Holder
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  An electrode addressing protocol for imaging brain function with electrical impedance tomography using a 16-channel semi-parallel system.

Authors:  L Fabrizi; A McEwan; T Oh; E J Woo; D S Holder
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Adjacent stimulation and measurement patterns considered harmful.

Authors:  Andy Adler; Pascal Olivier Gaggero; Yasheng Maimaitijiang
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  A novel method for recording neuronal depolarization with recording at 125-825 Hz: implications for imaging fast neural activity in the brain with electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  T Oh; O Gilad; A Ghosh; M Schuettler; D S Holder
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Electrode fabrication and interface optimization for imaging of evoked peripheral nervous system activity with electrical impedance tomography (EIT).

Authors:  Christopher A R Chapman; Kirill Aristovich; Matteo Donega; Cathrine T Fjordbakk; Thaleia-Rengina Stathopoulou; Jaime Viscasillas; James Avery; Justin D Perkins; David Holder
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 6.  Bioelectronic medicines: a research roadmap.

Authors:  Karen Birmingham; Viviana Gradinaru; Polina Anikeeva; Warren M Grill; Victor Pikov; Bryan McLaughlin; Pankaj Pasricha; Douglas Weber; Kip Ludwig; Kristoffer Famm
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 7.  Vagus nerve stimulation in experimental heart failure.

Authors:  Hani N Sabbah; Itamar Ilsar; Asaph Zaretsky; Sharad Rastogi; Mengjun Wang; Ramesh C Gupta
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 8.  Vagus nerve stimulation, side effects, and long-term safety.

Authors:  E Ben-Menachem
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  Investigation of potential artefactual changes in measurements of impedance changes during evoked activity: implications to electrical impedance tomography of brain function.

Authors:  Kirill Y Aristovich; Gustavo S Dos Santos; David S Holder
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 2.833

10.  Imaging fast electrical activity in the brain with electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  Kirill Y Aristovich; Brett C Packham; Hwan Koo; Gustavo Sato Dos Santos; Andy McEvoy; David S Holder
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  2 in total

1.  Imaging fascicular organization of rat sciatic nerves with fast neural electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  Enrico Ravagli; Svetlana Mastitskaya; Nicole Thompson; Francesco Iacoviello; Paul R Shearing; Justin Perkins; Alexander V Gourine; Kirill Aristovich; David Holder
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 2.  Selective Vagus Nerve Stimulation as a Therapeutic Approach for the Treatment of ARDS: A Rationale for Neuro-Immunomodulation in COVID-19 Disease.

Authors:  Svetlana Mastitskaya; Nicole Thompson; David Holder
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.