Kavin Sundaram1, Nicolas S Piuzzi2, Brendan M Patterson1, Kim L Stearns1, Viktor E Krebs1, Michael A Mont3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, A41, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, A41, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. piuzzin@ccf.org. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, 10075, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The goals of this study were to compare patient satisfaction and wound-related complications in patients receiving2-octyl cyanoacrylate (glue) and polyester mesh for skin closure after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus staples. METHODS:A total of 60 knees in 54 patients undergoing TKA were enrolled in a prospective trial and randomized to receive either skin closure with glue and polyester mesh (n = 30) or a control group closed with staples (n = 30). Hollander wound cosmesis score (measured on a scale of 0-5, with 0 being the best) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores (range 0-100 mm) for patient satisfaction with wound cosmesis, as well as wound-related readmission, reoperation, and complications, including superficial surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, wound hematoma, stitch abscess, and wound discharge, were assessed at 6 weeks and 90 days after TKA. Baseline characteristics were not statistically significantly different between the groups (p > 0.05). RESULTS: At 6 weeks and 90 days, the Hollander wound cosmesis score was significantly lower (p < 0.01) in the glue and polyester mesh groups. Similarly, at 6 weeks and 90 days, the VAS for patient satisfaction with wound cosmesis was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the glue and polyester mesh groups. The rate of superficial surgical site infection was 1/30 (3%) in glue and polyester mesh groups versus zero in the control group (p = 1.00). The rate of wound dehiscence was 1/30 (3%) in glue and polyester mesh groups versus zero in the control group (p = 1.00). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that glue and polyester mesh closure may offer superior cosmetic outcomes to staples for skin closure in TKA.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The goals of this study were to compare patient satisfaction and wound-related complications in patients receiving 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (glue) and polyester mesh for skin closure after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus staples. METHODS: A total of 60 knees in 54 patients undergoing TKA were enrolled in a prospective trial and randomized to receive either skin closure with glue and polyester mesh (n = 30) or a control group closed with staples (n = 30). Hollander wound cosmesis score (measured on a scale of 0-5, with 0 being the best) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores (range 0-100 mm) for patient satisfaction with wound cosmesis, as well as wound-related readmission, reoperation, and complications, including superficial surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, wound hematoma, stitch abscess, and wound discharge, were assessed at 6 weeks and 90 days after TKA. Baseline characteristics were not statistically significantly different between the groups (p > 0.05). RESULTS: At 6 weeks and 90 days, the Hollander wound cosmesis score was significantly lower (p < 0.01) in the glue and polyester mesh groups. Similarly, at 6 weeks and 90 days, the VAS for patient satisfaction with wound cosmesis was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the glue and polyester mesh groups. The rate of superficial surgical site infection was 1/30 (3%) in glue and polyester mesh groups versus zero in the control group (p = 1.00). The rate of wound dehiscence was 1/30 (3%) in glue and polyester mesh groups versus zero in the control group (p = 1.00). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that glue and polyester mesh closure may offer superior cosmetic outcomes to staples for skin closure in TKA.
Entities:
Keywords:
2-octyl cyanoacrylate; Staples; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement; Wound closure; Wound complications; Wound cosmesis
Authors: William L Healy; Craig J Della Valle; Richard Iorio; Keith R Berend; Fred D Cushner; David F Dalury; Jess H Lonner Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Steven M Kurtz; Edmund C Lau; Kevin L Ong; Edward M Adler; Frank R Kolisek; Michael T Manley Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Carl Deirmengian; Keith Kardos; Patrick Kilmartin; Alexander Cameron; Kevin Schiller; Javad Parvizi Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: N P Kort; E Gómez Barrena; M Bédard; S Donell; J-A Epinette; B Gomberg; M T Hirschmann; P Indelli; Ismail Khosravi; T Karachalios; M C Liebensteiner; B Stuyts; R Tandogan; B Violante; L Zagra; M Thaler Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2020-08-25 Impact factor: 4.342