| Literature DB >> 31690058 |
Dong-Sheng Wang1, Xin-Jun Yu2, Xiao-Yu Zhu3, Zhao Wang4, Hui-Juan Li5, Zhi-Peng Wang6.
Abstract
In the current study, corn steep liquor (CSL) is evaluated as an ideal raw agro-material for efficient lipid and docosahexaenoic acid DHA production by Aurantiochytrium sp. Low CSL level in medium (nitrogen deficiency) stimulated the biosynthesis of lipids and DHA while inhibiting cellular growth. The transcriptomic profiles of the Aurantiochytrium sp. cells are analyzed and compared when cultured under high (H group), normal (N group), and low (L group) levels of CSL in the medium. The discriminated transcriptomic profiles from the three groups indicates that changes in CSL level in medium result in a global change in transcriptome of Aurantiochytrium sp. The overall de novo assembly of cDNA sequence data generated 61,163 unigenes, and 18,129 of them were annotated in at least one database. A total of 5105 differently expressed (DE) genes were found in the N group versus the H group, with 2218 downregulated and 2887 upregulated. A total of 3625 DE genes were found in the N group versus the L group, with 1904 downregulated and 1721 upregulated. The analysis and categorization of the DE genes indicates that the regulation mechanism of CSL involved in the perception and transduction of the limited nitrogen signal, the interactions between the transcription factors (TFs) and multiple downstream genes, and the variations in downstream genes and metabolites, in sequence, are illuminated for the first time in the current study.Entities:
Keywords: Aurantiochytrium sp.; DHA; RNA-seq; corn steep liquor (CSL); nitrogen-deficiency; signal transduction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31690058 PMCID: PMC6920895 DOI: 10.3390/biom9110695
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Effects of different CSL-levels in medium on biomass, lipid, and DHA yields in Aurantiochytrium sp. cells. All data are the means of three replicates; vertical bars represent error bars with values equal to the standard error of the mean.
Variations in the expressions of key genes in the Aurantiochytrium sp. cells cultured at three CSL levels. Data are given as means ± standard deviation, n = 3; CSL, corn steep liquor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
| Pathways | Gene ID | Description | FPKM | RT-PCR Validation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H Group | N Group | L Group | H Group | N Group | L Group | |||
|
|
|
| 66 ± 2.1 | 137.1 ± 3.6 | 211 ± 5.9 | 48.3 ± 2.4 ** | 119 ± 2.7 | 198 ± 3.1 * |
| DN16202 |
| 1.6 ± 0.4 | 3.8 ± 0.6 | 28.9 ± 2.1 | 10.8 ± 3.1 * | 15.7 ± 2.1 | 30.4 ± 2.6 ** | |
| DN15010 |
| 1.6 ± 0.7 | 28.9 ± 2.1 | 32.3 ± 2.4 | 3.2 ± 1.9 ** | 20.4 ± 2.8 ** | 38.4 ± 2.1 | |
| DN16221 |
| 43.7 ± 1.6 | 35.9 ± 1.6 | 29.5 ± 2.1 | 57.2 ± 3.2 ** | 40.2 ± 3.6 | 35.2 ± 4.1 ** | |
| DN14594 |
| 13.4 ± 0.9 | 6.1 ± 0.9 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | ||||
| DN5965 |
| 9.9 ± 1.2 | 9.4 ± 1.2 | 8.2 ± 0.7 | ||||
|
| DN12414 |
| 15.1 ± 0.9 | 54 ± 1.4 | 68.6 ± 2.6 | 10.5 ± 0.9 ** | 43.2 ± 4.2 | 54.2 ± 1.5 * |
| DN15488 |
| 44.6 ± 2.5 | 47.8 ± 0.8 | 109.3 ± 2.6 | ||||
| DN9564 |
| 9.1 ± 2.1 | 20.3 ± 1.4 | 23.6 ± 1.2 | ||||
|
| DN12917 |
| 33.7 ± 2.1 | 14.8 ± 1.5 | 12.5 ± 0.5 | |||
| DN12820 |
| 8.7 ± 0.7 | 7.1 ± 0.9 | 2.4 ± 0.5 | ||||
| DN14856 |
| 2.5 ± 0.3 | 1 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.5 | ||||
|
| DN11343 |
| 16 ± 0.9 | 19.6 ± 1.8 | 23.5 ± 2.1 | 12.5 ± 2.7 * | 20.5 ± 3.1 | 28.4 ± 1.8 * |
| DN15563 |
| 10.6 ± 1.4 | 11.1 ± 0.9 | 31.5 ± 2.6 | ||||
| DN11433 |
| 1.1 ± 0.5 | 9.6 ± 0.7 | 10.5 ± 2.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 ** | 5.3 ± 0.8 | 12.4 ± 1.7 ** | |
Figure 2The distribution of unigene annotation in four databases.
Figure 3Categorization of GO function for unigenes in Aurantiochytrium sp. cells.
Figure 4COG function classification for unigenes in Aurantiochytrium sp. cells.
Figure 5The metabolic network and key enzymes in Aurantiochytrium sp. cells. G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; ME, malic enzyme; ACL, ATP citrate lyase; ACC, Acetyl-CoA carboxylase; FAS, fatty acid synthase; FAE, fatty acid elongase; FAD, fatty acid desaturase; PKS, polyketide synthase; IDCH, Isocitrate dehydrogenase; AS, Asparagine synthase; GS, Glutamate synthase; EMP, glycolytic pathway; HMP, Hexose Monophosphate Pathway; TCA, Tricarboxylic acid cycle.
Figure 6The regulation model in Aurantiochytrium sp. cells under the CSL-rich condition (left) and CSL-limited condition (right).