Literature DB >> 31689799

High peroxidasin-like expression is a potential and independent prognostic biomarker in breast cancer.

Yanqing Li1, Yan Jiao2, Zhangping Luo3, Yang Li1, Yanan Liu1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is a frequent female malignant tumor with high mortality and poor prognosis. Peroxidasin like (PXDNL) has many biological functions, including characteristic activity of hormone biosynthesis, host defense, and cell motility. In addition, PXDNL is closely connected with the progression of breast cancer. In this study, we found that PXDNL may be an independent prognostic biomarker of breast cancer.We tested the mRNA expression of PXDNL in breast cancer by detecting The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The chi-squared test was used to evaluate clinical correlation. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate diagnosis potential in breast cancer. Subsequently, survival analyses were performed to identify the relevance between the expression of PXDNL and the overall survival/relapse-free survival of patients with breast cancer. Univariate/multivariate Cox regression model was executed to detect risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with breast cancer.PXDNL is highly expressed in breast cancer tissues and is related to survival status of patients. The ROC curve showed that PXDNL had beneficial diagnostic ability in breast cancer. Survival analysis indicated that patients with breast cancer with high PXDNL expression generally had decreased overall survival/relapse-free survival. Univariate/multivariate Cox model analyses further suggested an association between PXDNL expression and prognosis of patients with breast cancer.High PXDNL expression is a potential and independent prognostic biomarker in breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31689799      PMCID: PMC6946426          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


Introduction

Breast cancer has a high incidence and is a common malignant tumor among women.[ In recent years, with the ongoing development of modern molecular diagnostic technology, the treatment of breast cancer has made progress.[ However, the poor prognosis of breast cancer, and particularly late-stage, is still an urgent problem. Therefore, identifying a reliable and feasible prognostic biomarker of breast cancer has been a key field in breast cancer research. peroxidasin like (PXDNL) is a member of the peroxidase gene family. This gene encodes for peroxidase-like protein, and its isomer PMR1 encodes nucleic acid endonucleases that selectively degrade certain target genes. The expression of human PXDNL stimulates cell motility in a similar way to Xenopus PMR1, thus providing clear evidence which links the downregulation of endonucleases with the regulation of cell motility.[ In a cohort study, researchers found that the top-driving oncogenes, including PXDNL 7, had mutation prevalence of >5% in 6697 patients with breast cancer, but their role in breast cancer was unsharp.[ For further prove the clinical roles of PXDNL in breast cancer patients, we investigated the expression of PXDNL by detecting The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The chi-squared test was implemented to assess clinical relevance. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to calculate the capability of diagnosis in patients. Survival analyses were executed to identify the effect of PXDNL on the overall survival/relapse-free survival of patients with breast cancer. Univariate/multivariate Cox regression model were used to find out independent risk factors for breast cancer prognosis.

Materials and methods

Data source

Using TCGA (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/) databases, we obtained currently RNAseq data and available clinical from breast cancer and normal tissues, respectively. All data used was from public datasets.

Data mining and statistical analyses

We included the full TCGA-BRCA cohort in this analysis, and “NA” values were removed when specific analyses (Fisher exact test, chi-squared test, and survival analysis) were executed. In order to evaluate the prognosis results more accurately, some clinical features of patients are used. We do data mining by using R (version 3.6.1).[ The ggplot2 package[ was used to plot the boxplot of clinical features. The pROC package[ mapped ROC, which was used to assess diagnostic capabilities and the best OS cut-off values based on the Youden index, to separate the high PXDNL expression group from the low PXDNL expression group. The chi-squared test was used to test the possible clinical interdependency between clinical features and the expression of PXDNL. We also used a survival package[ to plot survival curves, and then a logarithmic rank test to check survival bias. The univariate Cox model and multivariate Cox model were used to distinguish the independence of PXDNL expression from other clinical features.

Results

Data cohort characteristics

The PXDNL expression levels, as well as clinical features of patients, including age, sex, progesterone receptor (PR) status, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) status, estrogen receptor (ER) status, cancer stage, new type, histologic grade, molecular subtype, menopause status, T/N/M classification, lymph node status, margin status, radiation therapy, neoadjuvant treatment, targeted molecular therapy, sample type, overall survival, relapse-free survival, and vital status, are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Correlation between the expression of peroxidasin like and the clinicopathologic characteristics in breast cancer.

Correlation between the expression of peroxidasin like and the clinicopathologic characteristics in breast cancer.

PXDNL expression was correlated with breast cancer

Boxplots of PXDNL expression showed that higher PXDNL expression was obtained in breast cancer (P = 1.8 × 10−06; Fig. 1). In addition, PXDNL was also differentially expressed by molecular subtype (P = .015), menopause status (P = .00028), age (P = .00039), M classification (P = .0016), and vital status (P = .0034).
Figure 1

The different PXDNL expressions in the boxplot. The expression of PXDNL is grouped by type (A), molecular subtype (B), menopause status (C), age (D), ER (E), PR (F), HER2 (G), stage (H), T classification (I), N classification (J), and M classification (K), and vital status (L). ER = estrogen receptor, HER2 = human epidermal growth factor 2, PR = progesterone receptor, PXDNL = peroxidasin like.

The different PXDNL expressions in the boxplot. The expression of PXDNL is grouped by type (A), molecular subtype (B), menopause status (C), age (D), ER (E), PR (F), HER2 (G), stage (H), T classification (I), N classification (J), and M classification (K), and vital status (L). ER = estrogen receptor, HER2 = human epidermal growth factor 2, PR = progesterone receptor, PXDNL = peroxidasin like.

PXDNL has substantial diagnostic capability

According to ROC analysis, we found that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.636, suggesting that PXDNL may have considerable diagnostic ability. We reached the same results by analyzing the subgroups of different stages (AUC: 0.628, 0.637, 0.633, 0.627 for stage I, stage II, stage III, stage IV, respectively; Fig. 2).
Figure 2

The ROC curve of peroxidasin like (PXDNL) in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. A, Nontumor sample and tumor sample. B, Nontumor sample and tumor sample of stage I. C, Nontumor sample and tumor sample of stage II. D, Nontumor sample and tumor sample of stage III. E, Nontumor sample and tumor sample of stage IV. AUC = area under the curve, ROC = receiver-operating characteristic curve.

The ROC curve of peroxidasin like (PXDNL) in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. A, Nontumor sample and tumor sample. B, Nontumor sample and tumor sample of stage I. C, Nontumor sample and tumor sample of stage II. D, Nontumor sample and tumor sample of stage III. E, Nontumor sample and tumor sample of stage IV. AUC = area under the curve, ROC = receiver-operating characteristic curve.

Relationship between PXDNL and patients’ clinical features

As shown in Table 1, the expression of PXDNL was closely related to age (P = .032), ER status (P = .0003), T/N/M classification (P = .0001; P = 0; P = 0), margin status (P = .0002), stage (P = 0), and vital status (P = 0) of patients with breast cancer.

The increase in PXDNL expression was related to poor overall survival of breast cancer

We found that high PXDNL expression in patients with overall survival (P < .0001; Fig. 3), Subgroup analysis showed that PXDNL expression had significant prognostic value in infiltrating ductal carcinoma (P = .00097), infiltrating lobular carcinoma (P = .0073), ER-positive cancer (P < .0001), PR-negative cancer (P = .032), PR-positive cancer (P = 0.00013), HER2-negative cancer (P = .011), Lum A (P = .0015), and Lum B (P = .041).
Figure 3

Survival analysis of PXDNL expression in terms of overall survival. Kaplan-Meier curves produced survival analysis (A) and subgroup analysis of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (B), infiltrating lobular carcinoma (C), ER positive (D), PR negative (E), PR positive (F), HER2 negative (G), Lum A (H), and Lum B (I). ER = estrogen receptor, HER2 = human epidermal growth factor 2, PR = progesterone receptor, PXDNL = peroxidasin like.

Survival analysis of PXDNL expression in terms of overall survival. Kaplan-Meier curves produced survival analysis (A) and subgroup analysis of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (B), infiltrating lobular carcinoma (C), ER positive (D), PR negative (E), PR positive (F), HER2 negative (G), Lum A (H), and Lum B (I). ER = estrogen receptor, HER2 = human epidermal growth factor 2, PR = progesterone receptor, PXDNL = peroxidasin like. Univariate and multivariate Cox model analysis recommended that high expression of PXDNL may be an independent risk factor for overall survival in patients with breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76, P = .017, Table 2).
Table 2

Summary of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of overall survival duration.

Summary of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of overall survival duration.

The increase of PXDNL expression is related to poor relapse-free survival in patients with breast cancer

We found that high PXDNL expression in patients with shorter relapse-free survival time (P < .0059; Fig. 4). Subgroup analysis showed that PXDNL expression had significant prognostic value in infiltrating ductal carcinoma (P = .016), ER-positive cancer (P = .0035), Lum A (P = .0019), and PR-positive cancer (P = .012).
Figure 4

Survival analysis of PXDNL expression in terms of relapse-free survival. Kaplan-Meier curves produced survival analysis (A) and subgroup analysis of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (B), infiltrating lobular carcinoma (C), ER positive (D), PR negative (E), PR positive (F), HER2 negative (G), Lum A (H), and Lum B (I). ER = estrogen receptor, HER2 = human epidermal growth factor 2, PR = progesterone receptor, PXDNL = peroxidasin like.

Survival analysis of PXDNL expression in terms of relapse-free survival. Kaplan-Meier curves produced survival analysis (A) and subgroup analysis of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (B), infiltrating lobular carcinoma (C), ER positive (D), PR negative (E), PR positive (F), HER2 negative (G), Lum A (H), and Lum B (I). ER = estrogen receptor, HER2 = human epidermal growth factor 2, PR = progesterone receptor, PXDNL = peroxidasin like. Univariate and multivariate Cox model analysis recommended that high expression of PXDNL may be an independent risk factor for the relapse-free survival in patients with breast cancer (HR = 1.54, P = .046; Table 3).
Table 3

Summary of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of relapse-free survival duration.

Summary of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of relapse-free survival duration.

Discussion

Breast cancer is a fatal disease that particularly endangers women's health. With the development of modern social economy, various lifestyle changes such as premature sexual maturity, postponement of menopause, infertility, late childbearing, unhealthy lifestyle, increased intake of exogenous estrogen, and other environmental factors have increased in the incidence of breast cancer year by year.[ In 2018, there were 209.96 million new cases of breast cancer worldwide, making it one of the most common causes of female cancerous deaths in developed and developing countries.[ Although the clinical treatment of breast cancer has made progress, the prognosis of the disease remains poor. Most common treatments, such as radiotherapy or surgical resection, do not guarantee the survival of patients with advanced breast cancer.[ Conversely, continued chemotherapy can lead to severe endothelial dysfunction, leading to complications such as heart attack, heart failure, stroke, or congestive decline.[ Therefore, the field urgently requires a prognostic biomarker to guide clinicians to improve the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. Our team has been working for exploring novel biomarkers in various cancer.[ In this study, we found that the high PXDNL expression may be a potential and independent risk factor for the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. PMR1 endonuclease was found in the breasts of Xenopus laevis and identified as a member of a large and diverse peroxidase gene family. PXDNL was later identified as another member of this family.[ PXDNL mutations have been found in 6697 patients with breast cancer and a system (http://www.g-2-o.com) was set up to quickly verify the mutations found in a large breast cancer cohort, which contributed greatly to breast cancer research.[ We found that the expression of PXDNL was increased, suggesting that PXDNL played an important function in breast cancer progression. In addition, we also found increased expression of PXDNL in deceased patients, suggesting a link between high expression of PXDNL and poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Nonetheless, as the potential mechanism is still unclear, it is necessary to further explore the role played by PXDNL in patients with breast cancer. PXDNL is closely related to the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. Researchers have found that PXDNL is involved in many disease processes, such as neurodegenerative disorders[ and severe depressive disorders.[ However, the specific role of PXDNL in breast cancer has not yet been elucidated. In this research, we used ROC curves to show that that PXDNL has an excellent diagnostic ability in breast cancer. In addition, we found that when PXDNL was overexpressed, the overall/ relapse-free survival time of patients with breast cancer was shorter. By subgroup analysis, we found that PXDNL had statistical significance in the overall survival rate of fibroductal carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma, which have been identified as the main sources of breast cancer.[ Interestingly, we also found that PXDNL had statistical significance in the overall survival analysis of HER2-negative molecular subtyping, which has further improved patient individualization and precise treatment. In view of the correlation between endonuclease and metastasis mechanisms of malignant tumors, and the established role of PXDNL in endonucleases,[ it seems that PXDNL take part in the metastasis of breast cancer. In fact, previous studies have confirmed that PXDNL expression is associated with the migration ability of MCF-7 cells.[ Therefore, the association between high PXDNL expression and low survival rate in patients with breast cancer in this study may be due to the potential contribution of PXDNL to tumor metastasis. As far as we know, this is the first study to investigate the prognostic value of PXDNL in breast cancer. With joint efforts from other studies of PXDNL, our study should provide utility for researchers to fully understand the effect of PXDNL in cancer progression and provide a greater possibility to offer patients prognosis prediction. However, in-depth molecular mechanisms have not been fully elucidated in this cancer. Therefore, in the future, we plan to obtain more tissue samples from clinical patients, and further detect and understand levels of PXDNL expression according to various treatments received by patients.

Conclusion

In a word, we generally payed close attention to the prognosis values of PXDNL in patients with breast cancer. High PXDNL expression has been shown to be a potential and independent prognosis biomarker in breast cancer. Consider noting the sample size of the patient subset in the TCGA, or that further in vitro/in vivo data are required to formally prove the correlation between high PXDNL expression and poor prognosis.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Yanan Liu. Data curation: Yanqing Li, Yanan Liu. Formal analysis: Zhangping Luo, Yanan Liu. Investigation: Yanan Liu. Methodology: Yan Jiao, Yang Li. Software: Zhangping Luo. Visualization: Yang Li. Writing – original draft: Yang Li, Yanan Liu. Writing – review and editing: Yanqing Li, Yang Li, Yanan Liu. Yang Li orcid: 0000-0003-4399-1505.
  25 in total

1.  Plasma DNA integrity index as a potential molecular diagnostic marker for breast cancer.

Authors:  Azza M Kamel; Salwa Teama; Amal Fawzy; Mervat El Deftar
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-12-18

Review 2.  The PMR1 pump in alpha-synuclein toxicity and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Vassiliki Nikoletopoulou; Nektarios Tavernarakis
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  Predictive Diagnostic Pathology in the Target Therapy Era in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Caterina Marchio; Davide Balmativola; Roberta Castiglione; Laura Annaratone; Anna Sapino
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.465

4.  A Novel Relationship for Schizophrenia, Bipolar, and Major Depressive Disorder. Part 8: a Hint from Chromosome 8 High Density Association Screen.

Authors:  Xing Chen; Feng Long; Bin Cai; Xiaohong Chen; Lizeng Qin; Gang Chen
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 5.590

5.  Efficacy of scalp cooling in reducing alopecia in early breast cancer patients receiving contemporary chemotherapy regimens.

Authors:  Arlene Chan; Astrid Bauwens; Sally Pontre; Sally Jackson; Frances McGlone; Tracie Ernenwein; Jun Chih; Christopher Reid
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  A genome-wide approach to link genotype to clinical outcome by utilizing next generation sequencing and gene chip data of 6,697 breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lőrinc Pongor; Máté Kormos; Christos Hatzis; Lajos Pusztai; András Szabó; Balázs Győrffy
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 11.117

8.  High miR-454-3p expression predicts poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yanqing Li; Yan Jiao; Zhuo Fu; Zhangping Luo; Jing Su; Yang Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  The human PMR1 endonuclease stimulates cell motility by down regulating miR-200 family microRNAs.

Authors:  Shan-Qing Gu; Daniel Gallego-Perez; Sean P McClory; Junfeng Shi; Joonhee Han; L James Lee; Daniel R Schoenberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Natural history of age-related lobular involution and impact on breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Derek C Radisky; Daniel W Visscher; Ryan D Frank; Robert A Vierkant; Stacey Winham; Melody Stallings-Mann; Tanya L Hoskin; Aziza Nassar; Celine M Vachon; Lori A Denison; Lynn C Hartmann; Marlene H Frost; Amy C Degnim
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  8 in total

1.  Discovering Biomarkers in Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer by Metabolomics.

Authors:  Guoqiang Pan; Yuehan Ma; Jian Suo; Wei Li; Yang Zhang; Shanshan Qin; Yan Jiao; Shaopeng Zhang; Shuang Li; Yuan Kong; Yu Du; Shengnan Gao; Daguang Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  HN1 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for liver cancer.

Authors:  Zhicheng Liu; Dingquan Yang; Yanqing Li; Yan Jiao; Guangchao Lv
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  KLRK1 as a prognostic biomarker for lung adenocarcinoma cancer.

Authors:  Aifang Jiang; Guanqi Gao; Yanan Zhang; Zeyang Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Expression of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit B in liver cancer and its prognostic significance.

Authors:  Qing Yue; Lingyu Meng; Baoxing Jia; Wei Han
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Comprehensive multi-omics analysis identified core molecular processes in esophageal cancer and revealed GNGT2 as a potential prognostic marker.

Authors:  Guo-Min Liu; Xuan Ji; Tian-Cheng Lu; Li-Wei Duan; Wen-Yuan Jia; Yun Liu; Mao-Lei Sun; Yun-Gang Luo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  The prognostic value of lncRNA SNHG4 and its potential mechanism in liver cancer.

Authors:  Yan Jiao; Yanqing Li; Baoxing Jia; Qingmin Chen; Guoqiang Pan; Fang Hua; Yahui Liu
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Expression and clinical significance of BDH1 in liver cancer.

Authors:  Zhicheng Liu; Yanqing Li; Ying Liu; Dingquan Yang; Yan Jiao; Yunpeng Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Development of a Novel Prognostic Signature Based on Antigen Processing and Presentation in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Aoshuang Qi; Mingyi Ju; Yinfeng Liu; Jia Bi; Qian Wei; Miao He; Minjie Wei; Lin Zhao
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.201

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.