| Literature DB >> 31114333 |
Yanqing Li1, Yan Jiao2, Zhuo Fu3, Zhangping Luo1, Jing Su1, Yang Li1.
Abstract
Purpose: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the clinic all over the world, which has become a public health challenge. The T/N/M staging system plays a core role in HCC prognosis. However, it cannot precisely stratify the risk of HCC prognosis. MiR-454-3p plays an important role in the progression of tumors. Therefore, we need to develop more reliable prognostic markers for HCC patients which can focus on miR-454-3p.Entities:
Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); miR-454-3p; predictor; prognosis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31114333 PMCID: PMC6497481 DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S196655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Manag Res ISSN: 1179-1322 Impact factor: 3.989
Demographic and clinical characteristics of TCGA-LIHC cohort
| Characteristics | Number of pts (%) |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | |
| <55 | 118 (31.89) |
| ≥55 | 252 (68.11) |
| Gender | |
| Female | 119 (32.08) |
| Male | 252 (67.92) |
| Histological type | |
| Fibrolamellar carcinoma | 3 (0.81) |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | 361 (97.3) |
| Hepatocholangiocarcinoma (mixed) | 7 (1.89) |
| Histologic grade | |
| G1 | 55 (14.82) |
| G2 | 174 (46.9) |
| G3 | 125 (33.69) |
| G4 | 13 (3.5) |
| NA | 4 (1.08) |
| Stage | |
| I | 172 (46.36) |
| II | 86 (23.18) |
| III | 85 (22.91) |
| IV | 5 (1.35) |
| NA | 23 (6.2) |
| T classification | |
| T1 | 181 (48.79) |
| T2 | 94 (25.34) |
| T3 | 80 (21.56) |
| T4 | 13 (3.5) |
| TX | 1 (0.27) |
| NA | 2 (0.54) |
| N classification | |
| N0 | 254 (68.46) |
| N1 | 4 (1.08) |
| NX | 112 (30.19) |
| NA | 1 (0.27) |
| M classification | |
| M0 | 268 (72.24) |
| M1 | 4 (1.08) |
| MX | 99 (26.68) |
| Residual tumor | |
| R0 | 326 (87.87) |
| R1 | 16 (4.31) |
| R2 | 1 (0.27) |
| RX | 21 (5.66) |
| NA | 7 (1.89) |
| Vital status | |
| Deceased | 128 (34.5) |
| Living | 243 (65.5) |
| Recurrence | |
| No | 178 (55.8) |
| Yes | 141 (44.2) |
Abbreviation: NA, not available.
Figure 1The different miR-454-3p expressions in the boxplot. Boxplots showing the expression differences of miR-454-3p according to histological type, sample type, tumor vs normal clinical and stage.
Correlation between the expression of miR-454-3p and the clinicopathologic characteristics in liver cancer
| Characteristics | High expression (%) | Low expression (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| <55 | 31 | 87 | 0.3231 |
| ≥55 | 53 | 199 | |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 37 | 82 | 0.0145 |
| Male | 48 | 204 | |
| Histological type | |||
| Fibrolamellar carcinoma | 0 | 3 | 0.6005 |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | 83 | 278 | |
| Hepatocholangiocarcinoma (mixed) | 2 | 5 | |
| Histologic grade | |||
| G1 | 7 | 48 | 0.0529 |
| G2 | 36 | 138 | |
| G3 | 38 | 87 | |
| G4 | 3 | 10 | |
| Stage | |||
| I | 25 | 147 | 0 |
| II | 21 | 65 | |
| III | 35 | 50 | |
| IV | 2 | 3 | |
| T classification | |||
| T1 | 27 | 154 | 0.0003 |
| T2 | 23 | 71 | |
| T3 | 31 | 49 | |
| T4 | 3 | 10 | |
| TX | 1 | 0 | |
| N classification | 61 | 193 | 0.0247 |
| N0 | 3 | 1 | |
| N1 | 21 | 91 | |
| NX | |||
| M classification | |||
| M0 | 70 | 198 | 0.0137 |
| M1 | 2 | 2 | |
| MX | 13 | 86 | |
| Residual tumor | |||
| R0 | 73 | 253 | 0.8043 |
| R1 | 5 | 11 | |
| R2 | 0 | 1 | |
| RX | 5 | 16 | |
| Vital status | |||
| Deceased | 39 | 89 | 0.0171 |
| Living | 46 | 197 | |
| Recurrence | |||
| No | 32 | 146 | 0.0537 |
| Yes | 39 | 102 | |
Figure 2Survival analysis of miR-454-3p expression in terms of overall survival. Kaplan–Meier curves produced survival analysis and subgroup analysis. Subgroup analysis includes histological grade (G1/G2 and G3/G4) and clinical stage (I/II and III/IV).
Summary of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of overall survival duration
| Parameters | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI | HR | 95%CI | ||||
| 1 | Age | ||||||
| ≥55/<55 | 1.04 | 0.71–1.51 | 0.836 | ||||
| 2 | Gender | ||||||
| Male/female | 0.81 | 0.57–1.17 | 0.261 | ||||
| 3 | Histological type | ||||||
| Hepatocholangiocarcinoma/hepatocellular/fibrolamellar | 0.99 | 0.27–3.69 | 0.99 | ||||
| 4 | Histologic grade | ||||||
| G4/G3/G2/G1 | 1.05 | 0.84–1.3 | 0.671 | ||||
| 5 | Stage | ||||||
| IV/III/II/I | 1.38 | 1.15–1.66 | 0.001 | 0.82 | 0.66–1.03 | 0.088 | |
| 6 | T classification | ||||||
| T4/T3/T2/T1/NX | 1.67 | 1.39–2 | 0.00 | 1.87 | 1.48–2.35 | 0.00 | |
| 7 | N classification | ||||||
| N1/N0/NX | 0.72 | 0.5–1.04 | 0.083 | ||||
| 8 | M classification | ||||||
| M1/M0/MX | 0.73 | 0.5–1.06 | 0.097 | ||||
| 9 | Radiation therapy | ||||||
| Yes/no | 0.51 | 0.25–1.02 | 0.056 | ||||
| 10 | Residual tumor | ||||||
| Yes/no | 1.44 | 1.14–1.83 | 0.002 | 1.43 | 1.12–1.83 | 0.005 | |
| 11 | miR-454-3p | ||||||
| High/low | 1.72 | 1.18–2.51 | 0.005 | 1.58 | 1.06–2.34 | 0.024 | |
Gene sets enriched in phenotype high
| MSigDB collection | Gene set name | NES | NOM | FDR q-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| h.all.v6.2.symbols.gmt | HALLMARK_MITOTIC_SPINDLE | 1.905323 | 0.00 | 0.074578 |
| h.all.v6.2.symbols.gmt | HALLMARK_G2M_CHECKPOINT | 1.801321 | 0.002079 | 0.084591 |
| h.all.v6.2.symbols.gmt | HALLMARK_E2F_TARGETS | 1.691148 | 0.010309 | 0.12907 |
Notes: Gene sets with NOM P-value <0.05 and FDR q-value <0.25 are considered as significant.
Abbreviations: FDR, false discovery rate; NES, normalized enrichment score; NOM, nominal.
Figure 3Enrichment plots from GSEA. GSEA results showing E2F targets, G2M checkpoint, and mitotic spindle pathway were differentially expressed in high miR-454-3p expression group and low miR-454-3p expression group.