Literature DB >> 31114333

High miR-454-3p expression predicts poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Yanqing Li1, Yan Jiao2, Zhuo Fu3, Zhangping Luo1, Jing Su1, Yang Li1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the clinic all over the world, which has become a public health challenge. The T/N/M staging system plays a core role in HCC prognosis. However, it cannot precisely stratify the risk of HCC prognosis. MiR-454-3p plays an important role in the progression of tumors. Therefore, we need to develop more reliable prognostic markers for HCC patients which can focus on miR-454-3p.
Methods: We used Chi-square and Fisher exact tests to assess correlations between miR-454-3p expression and clinical parameters in liver cancer patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas database (TCGA). Then, Cox regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier curve, and log-rank test were used to compare the difference of survival between the high-expression group and low-expression group, and P value was included. Finally, we used TCGA data set to carry out gene enrichment analysis.
Results: In this research, the expression of miR-454-3p increased in HCC and was associated with patient survival, G3/G4 staging, III/IV staging and T staging. Higher miR-454-3p expressed patients had shorter survival time. Besides, mitotic spindle, G2M checkpoint, and E2F targets were differentially enriched in miR-454-3p high-expression phenotype by Gene set enrichment analysis.
Conclusion: Overexpression of miR-454-3p may be a significant and independent predictor of poor prognosis in HCC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); miR-454-3p; predictor; prognosis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31114333      PMCID: PMC6497481          DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S196655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Manag Res        ISSN: 1179-1322            Impact factor:   3.989


Introduction

HCC is one of the most common malignant tumors in clinic worldwide, as well as one of the few carcinomas with constant increasing mortality and incidence.1 However, the prognosis of HCC remains gloomy even after surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy. Predicting the prognosis of patients can help doctors give patients appropriate treatment in time, which is of great significance to improve the survival rate of patients. Although studies have suggested that using different histologic parameters could predict the prognosis of HCC, nonetheless, it cannot adequately stratify the risk of HCC prognosis. Therefore, we need to further explore a new cancer prognosis marker to identify HCC patients with poor prognosis. With the development of whole genome and transcriptome sequencing techniques, many non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) without the potential for protein coding while having the capacity of tumor prognosis were identified. As a representative member of the small RNAs, miRNA has been studied in depth and has the potential to predict the prognosis of patients.2–5 The miRNA can induce mRNA degradation or inhibit translation of mRNAs by targeting the 3′-non-translation region (3′-UTR).6,7 Therefore, we paid attention to the role of miRNAs in HCC. Previous studies have examined that miR-454-3p participated in the progression of cancer including non-small cell lung cancer,8 prostate cancer9 and breast cancer.10 However, the role of miR-454-3p in cancer progression and the prognostic meaning of the miR-454-3p expression in HCC remain unclear. In the present study, we found that miR-454-3p expression increased in HCC and it was associated with patient survival, G3/G4 staging, III/IV staging and T staging. Overexpression of miR–454-3p may be a significant independent predictor of poor prognosis in HCC patients.

Materials and methods

RNA-sequence data of hepatocellular carcinoma from TCGA

The RNA-sequence data of 371 liver cancer patients and corresponding clinical data were obtained from the public cancer genome map data portal. Clinicopathological parameters including age, sex, and T/N/M staging were also evaluated. The sequence of miR-454-3p is UAGUGCAAUAUUGCUUAGGGU (http://www.mirbase.org/cgi-bin/mature.pl?mature_acc=MIMAT0003885).

Statistical analysis

The box-plot was obtained to describe the expression difference of discrete variables by ggplot211 in R.12 The correlation between miR-454-3p expression and clinicopathological features was tested by chi-square test. The expression of miR-454-3p determined by ROC threshold value was used to define the high and low expression of miR-454-3p. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to compare the overall survival difference between the low and high expression groups, and the survival package in R was used to calculate the P-value through the logarithmic rank test. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the survival rate of patients with given clinical, pathological factors and the expression of miRNA-454-3p. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to study the effect of miRNA-454-3p expression on survival rate and clinical parameters (gender, grade, clinical stage, T/N/M stage, etc.)

GSEA

GSEA was used to assess the distribution trend of predefined gene sets in gene lists sorted by phenotype correlation and to determine the contribution of genes phenotype.13 In this study, GSEA was performed by using the GSEA 3.0 software, and the gene set of “h.all.v6.2.symbols.gmt” from the Molecular Signatures Database. We obtained standardized enrichment fraction (NES) by using permutation analysis 1,000 times.

Results

The characteristics of liver cancer patients

According to The Cancer Genome Atlas Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma data (TCGA-LIHC), 371 clinical patients and miR-454-3p expression data of liver cancer were studied. Table 1 describes the demographic and clinical characteristics of the liver cancer patients, including age, gender, histological type, T/N/M staging, etc.
Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of TCGA-LIHC cohort

CharacteristicsNumber of pts (%)
Age (years)
 <55118 (31.89)
 ≥55252 (68.11)
Gender
 Female119 (32.08)
 Male252 (67.92)
Histological type
 Fibrolamellar carcinoma3 (0.81)
 Hepatocellular carcinoma361 (97.3)
 Hepatocholangiocarcinoma (mixed)7 (1.89)
Histologic grade
 G155 (14.82)
 G2174 (46.9)
 G3125 (33.69)
 G413 (3.5)
 NA4 (1.08)
Stage
 I172 (46.36)
 II86 (23.18)
 III85 (22.91)
 IV5 (1.35)
 NA23 (6.2)
T classification
 T1181 (48.79)
 T294 (25.34)
 T380 (21.56)
 T413 (3.5)
 TX1 (0.27)
 NA2 (0.54)
N classification
 N0254 (68.46)
 N14 (1.08)
 NX112 (30.19)
 NA1 (0.27)
M classification
 M0268 (72.24)
 M14 (1.08)
 MX99 (26.68)
Residual tumor
 R0326 (87.87)
 R116 (4.31)
 R21 (0.27)
 RX21 (5.66)
 NA7 (1.89)
Vital status
 Deceased128 (34.5)
 Living243 (65.5)
Recurrence
 No178 (55.8)
 Yes141 (44.2)

Abbreviation: NA, not available.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of TCGA-LIHC cohort Abbreviation: NA, not available.

The relationship between the expression of miRNA-454-3p and the clinicopathological parameters of liver cancer

In this study, HCC is the largest sample of patients with liver cancer, and the expression of miR-454-3p was not statistical significance with histological type. The expression of miR-454-3p in liver cancer (n=371) were higher than that in normal tissues (n=50, P<0.05). Besides, the expression of miR-454-3p was significantly different in the clinical staging of cancer (Figure 1). To assess the relationship between miR-454-3p expression and the clinicopathological parameters of liver cancer, patients were divided into the high expression group of miR-454-3p and the low expression group of miR-454-3p according to the optic cutoff (threshold value in ROC) of miR-454-3p expression (Table 2). Chi-square and Fisher exact tests shows that the high expression group of miR-454-3p with recurrence (P=0.0537), survival status (P=0.0171), T classification (P=0.0003), N classification (P =0.0247), M classification (P=0.0137), clinical period (P=0.048) and gender (P=0.0145) are obviously correlated.
Figure 1

The different miR-454-3p expressions in the boxplot. Boxplots showing the expression differences of miR-454-3p according to histological type, sample type, tumor vs normal clinical and stage.

Table 2

Correlation between the expression of miR-454-3p and the clinicopathologic characteristics in liver cancer

CharacteristicsHigh expression (%)Low expression (%)P
Age (years)
 <5531870.3231
 ≥5553199
Gender
 Female37820.0145
 Male48204
Histological type
 Fibrolamellar carcinoma030.6005
 Hepatocellular carcinoma83278
 Hepatocholangiocarcinoma (mixed)25
Histologic grade
 G17480.0529
 G236138
 G33887
 G4310
Stage
 I251470
 II2165
 III3550
 IV23
T classification
 T1271540.0003
 T22371
 T33149
 T4310
 TX10
 N classification611930.0247
 N031
 N12191
 NX
M classification
 M0701980.0137
 M122
 MX1386
Residual tumor
 R0732530.8043
 R1511
 R201
 RX516
Vital status
 Deceased39890.0171
 Living46197
Recurrence
 No321460.0537
 Yes39102
Correlation between the expression of miR-454-3p and the clinicopathologic characteristics in liver cancer The different miR-454-3p expressions in the boxplot. Boxplots showing the expression differences of miR-454-3p according to histological type, sample type, tumor vs normal clinical and stage.

High miR-454-3p expression is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival

Kaplan-Meier curve of overall survival showed that high miR-454-3p expression was associated with poor survival (P=0.0046, Figure 2). The subsequent subgroup analysis demonstrated that high miR-454-3p expression was associated with poor overall survival in G3/G4 stage tumors (P=0.026) and advanced (III/IV) liver cancer (P=0.016; Figure 2).
Figure 2

Survival analysis of miR-454-3p expression in terms of overall survival. Kaplan–Meier curves produced survival analysis and subgroup analysis. Subgroup analysis includes histological grade (G1/G2 and G3/G4) and clinical stage (I/II and III/IV).

Survival analysis of miR-454-3p expression in terms of overall survival. Kaplan–Meier curves produced survival analysis and subgroup analysis. Subgroup analysis includes histological grade (G1/G2 and G3/G4) and clinical stage (I/II and III/IV). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that poor overall survival was correlated with clinical stage (P=0.001), T classification (P=0), residual tumor (P=0.002), and miR-454-3p expression (P=0.005; Table 3). A further multivariate analysis confirmed overexpression of miR-454-3p was an independent prognostic factor for poor overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.58, 95% confidence interval: 1.06–2.34, P=0.024; Table 3).
Table 3

Summary of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of overall survival duration

ParametersUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
HR95%CIPHR95%CIP
1Age
≥55/<551.040.71–1.510.836
2Gender
Male/female0.810.57–1.170.261
3Histological type
Hepatocholangiocarcinoma/hepatocellular/fibrolamellar0.990.27–3.690.99
4Histologic grade
G4/G3/G2/G11.050.84–1.30.671
5Stage
IV/III/II/I1.381.15–1.660.0010.820.66–1.030.088
6T classification
T4/T3/T2/T1/NX1.671.39–20.001.871.48–2.350.00
7N classification
N1/N0/NX0.720.5–1.040.083
8M classification
M1/M0/MX0.730.5–1.060.097
9Radiation therapy
Yes/no0.510.25–1.020.056
10Residual tumor
Yes/no1.441.14–1.830.0021.431.12–1.830.005
11miR-454-3p
High/low1.721.18–2.510.0051.581.06–2.340.024
Summary of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of overall survival duration

GSEA identifies a miR-454-3p-related signaling pathway

To identify the signaling pathways activated in HCC, GSEA was performed between the low miR-454-3p expression data set and the high miR-454-3p expression data set.13 As shown in Table 4, GSEA reveals significant differences in the enrichment of MSigDB Collection (FDR <0.25, NOM P-value<0.05; h.all.v6.2.symbols.gmt). We chose the most significant signaling pathways based on NES (Figure 3; Table 4). Figure 3 shows that E2F targets, mitotic spindle, and G2M checkpoint is differentially enriched in miR-454-3p high-expression phenotype.
Table 4

Gene sets enriched in phenotype high

MSigDB collectionGene set nameNESNOM P-valueFDR q-value
h.all.v6.2.symbols.gmtHALLMARK_MITOTIC_SPINDLE1.9053230.000.074578
h.all.v6.2.symbols.gmtHALLMARK_G2M_CHECKPOINT1.8013210.0020790.084591
h.all.v6.2.symbols.gmtHALLMARK_E2F_TARGETS1.6911480.0103090.12907

Notes: Gene sets with NOM P-value <0.05 and FDR q-value <0.25 are considered as significant.

Abbreviations: FDR, false discovery rate; NES, normalized enrichment score; NOM, nominal.

Figure 3

Enrichment plots from GSEA. GSEA results showing E2F targets, G2M checkpoint, and mitotic spindle pathway were differentially expressed in high miR-454-3p expression group and low miR-454-3p expression group.

Gene sets enriched in phenotype high Notes: Gene sets with NOM P-value <0.05 and FDR q-value <0.25 are considered as significant. Abbreviations: FDR, false discovery rate; NES, normalized enrichment score; NOM, nominal. Enrichment plots from GSEA. GSEA results showing E2F targets, G2M checkpoint, and mitotic spindle pathway were differentially expressed in high miR-454-3p expression group and low miR-454-3p expression group.

Discussion

Analysis of TCGA-LIHC data showed that miR-454-3p expression was increased in liver cancer, and the miR-454-3p expression was relevant to the patient’s gender, clinical stage of liver cancer, T/N/M stage and survival status. Survival analysis showed that high expression of miRNA-454-3p was associated with poor overall survival, especially in III/IV stage of liver cancer. Univariate Cox and multivariate Cox analysis showed that miR-454-3p expression was an independent risk factor for prognosis of HCC patients. Many former studies have shown that miR-454-3p is highly expressed in a variety of cancers, such as non-small cell lung cancer,8 prostate cancer9 and breast cancer.10 Yue ZD reported that high miR-454 expression was significantly associated with histologic grade, and T/N/M stage.14 However, we found that miR-454-3p expression levels were not statistically significant in histologic grade, N classification and M classification, while it was associated G3/G4 staging, III/IV staging and T staging in liver cancer. The reason may be that the samples we studied come from many countries, we studied miR-454-3p expression in samples of liver cancer patients from white, yellow and black people in TCGA, whereas the previous study used HCC samples from yellow people only. Also, we researched that the 3ʹ product (miR-454-3p) of miR-454 may be an independent risk factor for the prognosis of HCC patients. It is well known that miRNAs deregulation is involved in cell cycle regulation among various diseases.15–18 In previous studies, miR-454-3p promotes the proliferation of prostate cancer cells by down-regulating N-myc downstream-regulated gene 2 (NDR 2).19 Based on our findings, miR-454 expression was related to clinical stage and T stage in liver cancer, as well as mitotic spindle and G2M checkpoint were enriched, we postulate that miR-454-3p promotes cellular proliferation and tumor growth due to the failure of cell cycle checkpoint. However, the target gene of miR-454-3p in HCC remains to be further verified. miR-454-3p can promote the progression of cancer, which implies that its high expression is associated with poor prognosis of patients. Metastasis of cancer cells is one of the main causes of poor prognosis in HCC patients.20 Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), as cancer cell metastasis inhibitors, was confirmed as a direct target of miR-454 by luciferase report analysis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).21 Also, we identified that miR-454-3p expression has a statistical difference in the N and M stages of the tumor. Meanwhile, the accurate mechanisms of miR-454-3p metastasis in HCC need further verification. In conclusion, the present study has demonstrated a universal fact that miR-454-3p may be a significant independent predictor of poor prognosis in HCC patients through TCGA database mining. Besides, mitotic spindle, G2M checkpoint, and E2F may be targets of miR-454-3p. However, we are aware of the limitations of our work – there is no patient tissue sampled. In our future work, the precise mechanism of miR-454-3p regulating cell cycle and metastasis in a large number of HCC samples will be verified.
  25 in total

1.  High expression of Ran binding protein 1 predicts poor outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a Cancer Genome Atlas database analysis.

Authors:  Zhengxiao Wei; Xiaoqiong Duan; Qi Li; Qingfeng Li; Yu Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-12

2.  Tumor Suppressor 4.1N/EPB41L1 is Epigenetic Silenced by Promoter Methylation and MiR-454-3p in NSCLC.

Authors:  Qin Yang; Lin Zhu; Mao Ye; Bin Zhang; Peihe Zhan; Hui Li; Wen Zou; Jing Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  GINS2 Functions as a Key Gene in Lung Adenocarcinoma by WGCNA Co-Expression Network Analysis.

Authors:  Wen Tian; Xianglin Yang; He Yang; Baosen Zhou
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Discovering Biomarkers in Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer by Metabolomics.

Authors:  Guoqiang Pan; Yuehan Ma; Jian Suo; Wei Li; Yang Zhang; Shanshan Qin; Yan Jiao; Shaopeng Zhang; Shuang Li; Yuan Kong; Yu Du; Shengnan Gao; Daguang Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  HN1 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for liver cancer.

Authors:  Zhicheng Liu; Dingquan Yang; Yanqing Li; Yan Jiao; Guangchao Lv
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Expression of La Ribonucleoprotein Domain Family Member 4B (LARP4B) in Liver Cancer and Their Clinical and Prognostic Significance.

Authors:  Yanqing Li; Yan Jiao; Yang Li; Yanan Liu
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.434

7.  Low EIF2B5 expression predicts poor prognosis in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lin Hou; Yan Jiao; Yanqing Li; Zhangping Luo; Xueying Zhang; Guoqiang Pan; Yuechen Zhao; Zhaoying Yang; Miao He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Lipocalin-1 Expression as a Prognosticator Marker of Survival in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Xueyan Zhang; Yingnan Cui; Miao He; Yan Jiao; Zhaoying Yang
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  GPSM2 Serves as an Independent Prognostic Biomarker for Liver Cancer Survival.

Authors:  Dingquan Yang; Fujian Ji; Yanqing Li; Yan Jiao; Xuedong Fang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

10.  OGDHL Expression as a Prognostic Biomarker for Liver Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Yan Jiao; Yanqing Li; Zhuo Fu; Lin Hou; Qingmin Chen; Yujie Cai; Peiqiang Jiang; Miao He; Zhaoying Yang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.