Literature DB >> 31688329

Startle and the StartReact Effect: Physiological Mechanisms.

Anthony N Carlsen1, Dana Maslovat2.   

Abstract

It has been well documented that a prepared response can be triggered at short latency following the presentation of a loud acoustic stimulus that evokes a reflexive startle response. Different hypotheses have been proposed for this so-called "StartReact" effect, although there is still much debate surrounding the physiological mechanisms involved in the observed reduction in reaction time (RT). In this review, we outline the various neurophysiological explanations underlying the StartReact effect and summarize the data supporting, and at times opposing, each possibility. Collectively, the experimental results do not unequivocally support a single explanation and we suggest the most parsimonious mechanism may involve a hybrid framework involving a distribution of neural pathways. Specifically, we propose that multiple node networks at the cortical, brainstem, and spinal levels are involved in response preparation and initiation, and the relative contributions of these structures depends on the type of stimulus delivered and the type of movement required. This approach may lead to greater understanding of the pathways involved in response preparation, initiation, and execution for both healthy and motor disordered populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31688329     DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  8 in total

1.  StartReact effects are dependent on engagement of startle reflex circuits: support for a subcortically mediated initiation pathway.

Authors:  Victoria Smith; Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Slowed reaction times in cognitive fatigue are not attributable to declines in motor preparation.

Authors:  Kathleen J Peters; Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Motor Areas Improves Reaction Time in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Christin M Sadler; Aline Tiemi Kami; Julie Nantel; Jonathan Lommen; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Does exposure to startle impact voluntary reaching movements in individuals with severe-to-moderate stroke?

Authors:  Marziye Rahimi; Zoe Swann; Claire F Honeycutt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Response triggering by an acoustic stimulus increases with stimulus intensity and is best predicted by startle reflex activation.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Christin M Sadler; Victoria Smith; Allison Bui; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Startle Increases the Incidence of Anticipatory Muscle Activations but Does Not Change the Task-Specific Muscle Onset for Patients After Subacute Stroke.

Authors:  Nan Xia; Chang He; Yang-An Li; Minghui Gu; Zejian Chen; Xiupan Wei; Jiang Xu; Xiaolin Huang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  An unperceived acoustic stimulus decreases reaction time to visual information in a patient with cortical deafness.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Dana Maslovat; Kimitaka Kaga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Assessment of trunk flexion in arm reaching tasks with electromyography and smartphone accelerometry in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  Yolanda Castillo-Escario; Hatice Kumru; Josep Valls-Solé; Loreto García-Alen; Joan Vidal; Raimon Jané
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.