| Literature DB >> 31687542 |
Ganesh Jethave1, Umesh Fegade2, Sanjay Attarde1, Sopan Ingle1, Mehrorang Ghaedi3, Mohammad Mehdi Sabzehmeidani4.
Abstract
In the present research article we explore the synthesis method and adsorption capability of ZnFe oxides nanocomposites by using Pb as dopant. A conventional and simple batch adsorption method is selected and optimized. Pb@ZnFe2O4 NCs were fabricated by facile method i.e. co-precipitation method and characterized by FESEM, XRD, IR, EDX. The removal of dye has monitored by UV method. An outstanding result is obtained as adsorption efficiency of 1042 mg g-1 shows more significant performance than currently available bench-mark adsorbents. The optimized parameters pH 7.1, Adsorbent Mass: 50 mg, Initial Dye Concentration: 150 mg/l and Agitation Time: 90 min results in 96.49 % removal of CR (Congo red) dye. A CCD (central composite design) is applied to evaluate the role of adsorption variables. Based on its excellent performance, cost effectiveness, facile fabrication and large surface area, the Pb@ZnFe2O4 has considerable potential for the manufacture of cost effective and efficient adsorbents for environmental applications.Entities:
Keywords: Adsorption mechanism; Congo red dye; Environmental science; Isotherms; Pb@ZnFe2O4; Statistical model
Year: 2019 PMID: 31687542 PMCID: PMC6819840 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Schematic representation of synthesis of Pb@ZnFe2O4 NCs and Adsorption prossess of CR.
Fig. 2(a) SEM Images of Pb@ZnFe2O4 average particle size 70.21 nm at low magnification, (b) high magnification for the closed image of nanoparticles, (c) X-ray diffraction pattern of Pb@ZnFe2O4, (d) EDX spectrum of the as-prepared Pb@ZnFe2O4.
Fig. 6Profiles of predicted values and desirability function for CR dye (Dotted lines indicate optimization values).
Fig. 3a) electrostatic attraction of charged particle of dye molecule to oppositely charged surface of Metal nanoparticles, b) Schematic picture of the adsorption of CR dye on the surface of Pb@ZnFe2O4 Nanocomposite.
Fig. 4(a) Plot of actual response versus predicted response and (b) Standardized main effect Pareto chart for the removal of CR using CCD.
Fig. 53-D surface plots for interactive effect of (a) pH and contact time, (b) adsorbent mass and initial CR concentration.
Kinetic parameters of adsorption of CR onto Pb@ZnFe2O4, Conditions: 0.20 g/L adsorbent over 10–200 mg L−1of CR dye concentration at optimum conditions of other variables.
| Models | Parameters | Parameter values: concentration of dye (mg L-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 20 | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | ||
| First order | K1 × 102 | 4.14 | 4.14 | 2.99 | 3.68 | 5.76 | 7.14 |
| qe | 0.843 | 1.149 | 1.459 | 1.697 | 1.787 | 1.9 | |
| R2 | 0.796 | 0.929 | 0.961 | 0.953 | 0.869 | 0.982 | |
| Second order | K2 × 102 | 1.28 | 0.65 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.13 |
| qe | 10.41 | 20.833 | 52.63 | 100 | 1042.85 | 200 | |
| R2 | 0.987 | 0.989 | 0.998 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.999 | |
| Intraparticle diffusion: | Kdiff | 0.698 | 1.398 | 4.015 | 7.412 | 10.08 | 11.27 |
| C | 3.569 | 7.079 | 14.73 | 34.92 | 58.24 | 78.57 | |
| R2 | 0.993 | 0.99 | 0.891 | 0.83 | 0.784 | 0.72 | |
Isotherm constant parameters and correlation coefficients calculated for the adsorption at various concentration of CR (10–200 mg/L), pH = 6 and 120 min contact time onto Pb@ZnFe2O4.
| Isotherm | Equation | Parameter values: Adsorbent conc. (mg/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | ||
| Langmuir | Ce/qe = CeαL/KL + 1/KL | qmax | 1042.86 | 976.92 | 755.55 | 641.66 |
| Ka | 29.41 | 1.8181 | 15.625 | 6.17 | ||
| R2 | 0.999 | 0.996 | 0.993 | 0.999 | ||
| Freundlich | Ln qe = ln KF + (1/n)ln Ce | 1/n | 0.804 | 0.752 | 0.767 | 0.726 |
| Kf | 12.41 | 14.36 | 15.74 | 6.073 | ||
| R2 | 0.993 | 0.987 | 0.985 | 0.978 | ||
| Tempkin | qe = Bl ln KT + Bl ln Ce | Β1 | 26.11 | 0.081 | 0.113 | 0.239 |
| KT | 1.36 | 64 × 107 | 24 × 106 | 29 × 108 | ||
| R2 | 0.979 | 0.962 | 0.952 | 0.922 | ||
| Dubinin and Radushkevich | Ln qe = ln Qs – Kε2 | Qs | 74.36 | 42.09 | 29.57 | 23.46 |
| K × 107 | 5 | 10 | 70 | 100 | ||
| E | 1000 | 2236 | 2672 | 7071 | ||
| R2 | 0.765 | 0.779 | 0.772 | 0.809 | ||
| Hurkins-Jura | 1/Qe2 = [B/A]-[1/A] logCe | A | 250 | 76.92 | 34.48 | 32.25 |
| B | 1.75 | 1.23 | 1.103 | 0.903 | ||
| R2 | 0.631 | 0.657 | 0.671 | 0.72 | ||
Fig. 7Linear fitting of Langmuir isotherm for four different adsorbent dosages (0.05–0.2 gL-1).
Thermodynamic parameters for CR adsorption on Pb@ZnFe2O4
| NPs | Temp. (K) | ΔG° (kJ mol−1) | ΔH° (kJ mol−1) | ΔS° (J mol-1 K−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 mg | 298 | -8.377 | -0.033 | -0.249 |
| 308 | -8.71 | |||
| 318 | -9.06 | |||
| 100 mg | 298 | -1.481 | -0.026 | -0.149 |
| 308 | -2.364 | |||
| 318 | -3.090 | |||
| 150 mg | 298 | -6.810 | -0.0166 | -0.0831 |
| 308 | -7.151 | |||
| 318 | -7.49 | |||
| 200 mg | 298 | -4.509 | -0.0083 | -0.0415 |
| 308 | -4.935 | |||
| 318 | -5.352 |
Fig. 8Real Sample analysis.
Comparison of the adsorption capacity of some adsorbents towards CR dye.
| Adsorbent | Qmax (mg/g) | References |
|---|---|---|
| NiO Nanoparticle | 39.7 | |
| Ni0.6Fe2.4O4 | 72.73 | |
| Cashew nut shell | 5.18 | |
| Kaolin | 5.44 | |
| Na Bentonite | 35.84 | |
| Acid-treated pine cone | 40.19 | |
| Raw pine cone | 19.18 | |
| Tamarind fruit shell | 10.48 | |
| Magnetically modified fodder yeast cell | 49.7 | |
| Chitosan/montmorillonite nanocomposite | 54.52 | |
| Nickel(II) oxide | 534.8 | |
| Nickel(II) hydroxide | 384.6 | |
| Ni/Mg/Al layered double hydroxides | 1250 | |
| hierarchical porous zinc oxide | 334 | |
| Pb@ZnFe2O4 | 1042.86 | Present Study |