| Literature DB >> 31687533 |
Nabila Achoui1, Karima Zaioua1, Dalila Hammoutène1, Bellara Kolli-Nedjar2, Yamina Akacem1.
Abstract
A gas-phase mechanism reaction of maleimide with urea or thiourea was studied by DFT method. A comparison between atomic charges, Fukui index evaluation and Frontier orbitals theory was carried out. The involvement of pre- and post-reactive complexes was examined as the reaction profiles are modelled. For each mechanism, two approaches have been proposed through nitrogen and sulfur (for thiourea), or oxygen and nitrogen (for urea) attack. The results indicate that the carbon double bonded of maleimide is the electophilic site and chalcogen atom of chalcogenourea is the nucleophilic one. The obtained activation free energies predict suitable specie that could be generated after an opening-cycle and new bonds formation. Consequently, the sulfur attack of thiourea was promoted on oxygen (urea) which is in accordance with the experiments.Entities:
Keywords: DFT; Fukui indices; Intrinsec reaction coordinate; Organic chemistry; Physical chemistry; Reaction mechanism; Thiourea and urea
Year: 2019 PMID: 31687533 PMCID: PMC6819788 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Scheme 1Reprensentation of the studied mechanism.
Scheme 2Optimized structures of maleimide, chalcogene and products of synthesis.
Atomic charges of maleimide.
| Charges | ||||
| Atoms | B3LYP/6-31G(d) | CAM-B3LYP/6–311++G(d,p) | ||
| MPA | NPA | MPA | NPA | |
| C1 | 0.598 | 0.667 | -0.030 | 0.669 |
| N2 | -0.662 | -0.695 | -0.230 | -0.685 |
| C4 | -0.162 | -0.266 | 0.050 | -0.229 |
| O8 | -0.459 | -0.538 | -0.304 | -0.543 |
Atomic charges () of thiourea and urea.
| B3LYP/6-31G(d) | CAM-B3LYP/6–311++G(d,p) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urea (X = O) | Thiourea (X = S) | Urea (X = O) | Thiourea (X = S) | |||||
| MPA | NPA | MPA | NPA | MPA | NPA | MPA | NPA | |
| -0.500 | -0.644 | -0.327 | -0.277 | -0.396 | -0.657 | -0.451 | -0.263 | |
| -0.743 | -0.898 | -0.722 | -0.826 | -0.389 | -0.851 | -0.267 | -0.802 | |
Reactivity indicesof maleimide and of thiourea/urea.
| Maleimide | ||||||||
| B3LYP/6-31G(d) | CAM-B3LYP/6–311++G(d,p) | |||||||
| MPA | NPA | MPA | NPA | |||||
| 0.094 | 0.086 | 0.026 | 0.081 | |||||
| 0.077 | 0.153 | 0.136 | 0.173 | |||||
| B3LYP/6-31G(d) | CAM-B3LYP/6–311++G(d,p) | |||||||
| Urea (X = O) | Thiourea (X = S) | Urea (X = O) | Thiourea (X = S) | |||||
| MPA | NPA | MPA | NPA | MPA | NPA | MPA | NPA | |
| 0.356 | 0.501 | 0.673 | 0.734 | 0.472 | 0.563 | 0.595 | 0.749 | |
| 0.106 | 0.169 | 0.049 | 0.075 | 0.133 | 0.161 | 0.024 | 0.079 | |
| 0.106 | 0.169 | 0.049 | 0.075 | 0.134 | 0.161 | 0.024 | 0.079 | |
q (N): charge of neutral species.
q (N-1) and q(N+1): charge of cationic and anionic species respectively.
Scheme 3Reprensentation of the density of reagents.
EHOMO, ELUMO and Gap energies in eV.
| Compounds | B3LYP/6-31G(d) | CAM-B3LYP/6–311++G(d,p) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHOMO | ELUMO | EHOMO | ELUMO | |
| Maleimide | -7.3 | -3.1 | -9,8 | -1.9 |
| Thiourea | -5.7 | -1.9 | -7.62 | -0.8 |
| Urea | -6.8 | -0.9 | -8.9 | -0.1 |
| Gap1(Thiourea/Maleimide) | 2.6 | 5.7 | ||
| Gap2 (Urea/Maleimide) | 3.7 | 7.1 | ||
Where:
Fig. 1Energetic diagram with thiourea mechanism ( in kcal/mol) values issued from B3LYP/6-31G(d) (CAM-B3LYP/6–311++G(d,p)).
Fig. 2Energetic diagram with urea mechanism ( in kcal/mol) values issued from B3LYP/6-31G(d) (CAM-B3LYP/6–311++G(d,p)).
Gibbs free activation (ΔGa) and reaction (ΔGR) energies (in kcal/mol). for both mechanisms.
| B3LYP/6-31G(d) | CAM-B3LYP/6–311++G(d,p) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiourea mechanism | ΔGa | ΔGR | ΔGa | ΔGR |
| 32.0 | -12.7 | 31.5 | -3.4 | |
| 45.0 | 31.9 | 45.9 | 4.9 | |
| 24.5 | -15.1 | 36.7 | -14.4 | |
| Urea mechanism | 79.2 | 3.4 | 88.6 | 15.5 |
| 55.6 | 18.3 | 44.9 | 2.4 | |
| 35.7 | -14.2 | 40.8 | -9.7 | |
Gibbs free activation (ΔGa) and reaction (ΔGR) energies (in kcal/mol) for both mechanisms.
| Methods | B3LYP/6-31G(d) | CAM-B3LYP/6–311++G(d,p) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiourea mechanism with nitrogen approach | ΔGa | ΔGR | ΔGa | ΔGR |
| 61.7 | -7.3 | 60.0 | -5.8 | |
| 64.1 | 49.5 | 48.8 | 17.7 | |
| 53.5 | -15.0 | 73.0 | -11.9 | |
| Urea mechanism with nitrogen approach | 32.3 | -8.10 | 59.5 | -6.9 |
| 70.9 | 35.1 | 72.4 | 28.0 | |
| 33.8 | -39.4 | 39.0 | -36.0 | |
Fig. 3Energetic diagram with thiourea mechanism by nitrogen approach ( in kcal/mol) values issued from B3LYP/6-31G(d) (CAM-B3LYP/6–311++G(d,p)).
Fig. 4Energetic diagram with urea mechanism by nitrogen approach ( in kcal/mol) values issued from B3LYP/6-31G(d) (CAM-B3LYP/6–311++G(d,p)).