Literature DB >> 31686792

Factors Associated With Regorafenib Adherence With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Kazuyoshi Kawakami1, Takeru Wakatsuki2, Azusa Soejima1, Kazuo Kobayashi1, Takashi Yokokawa1, Takeshi Aoyama1, Kenichi Suzuki1, Mitsukuni Suenaga2, Kensei Yamaguchi2, Ayaka Inoue3, Yoshiaki Machida3, Toshihiro Hama1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The clinical factors that may affect adherence to regorafenib remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence to regorafenib with mCRC and to identify factors that might affect adherence to regorafenib.
METHODS: A total of 108 consecutively enrolled Japanese patients with mCRC received regorafenib. Adherence was measured by pharmacists using pill counts and a self-reported treatment diary for patients at a pharmaceutical outpatient clinic. The median relative dose intensities of regorafenib and the factors adversely affecting adherence were retrospectively surveyed. Logistic regression analysis was then performed using patient socio-demographic factors and clinical factors.
RESULTS: A total of 96 patients were included in the analysis. The median adherence rate was 61.7% in the first cycle. The median relative dose intensity was 57.1%. The most common reason for non-adherence was a hand-foot-skin reaction (35.6%). On multivariate analysis, increased non-adherence to regorafenib was significantly associated with sex (female) [odds ratio (OR) = 4.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.43-13.22, p = 0.01]. DISCUSSION: Hand-foot-skin reactions and female sex were associated with lower adherence to regorafenib. Since these factors could be associated with lower adherence to regorafenib, it would be useful to consider these factors when assessing adherence.
© 2019 Kawakami et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adherence; colorectal cancer; hand-foot-skin reactions; regorafenib

Year:  2019        PMID: 31686792      PMCID: PMC6800560          DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S217835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence        ISSN: 1177-889X            Impact factor:   2.711


Introduction

Due to the availability of rapidly growing numbers of new oral anticancer agents directed towards specific tumor cell targets, medication adherence is becoming an increasingly important issue in oncology.1 In addition, over 80% of patients would prefer oral anticancer agents to intravenous administration.2 The development of new oral anticancer therapies has not only prolonged survival, but also improved cancer patients’ quality of life by decreasing the need for hospitalization.3 On the other hand, poor medication adherence could worsen treatment outcomes.4,5 Adherence rates to anticancer agents vary from 16% to 100%.6 Research on adherence to protein kinase inhibitor treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia showed an association between the missing of only a small number of doses per month (5%) and a less favorable clinical outcome.7 According to published data from the World Health Organization, non-adherence to medication has become a global problem of striking magnitude.8 Therefore, maintaining good adherence is an important issue, particularly with oral anticancer agents. Regorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that blocks the activity of several protein kinases involved in the multiple biological processes of progression and development of cancer; these kinases include vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 1–3 and tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin and epidermal growth factor homology domain 2 (TIE2) involved in tumor angiogenesis.9 Treatment with regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle has shown significant benefits for overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in two placebo-controlled phase 3 trials, CORRECT10 and CONCUR 11 A previous study reported that the average regorafenib adherence was 82% in southern Italy, and patients’ level of education, other concomitant oral medications, and patients’ general clinical condition may affect regorafenib adherence.12 However, there are no available data regarding the regorafenib adherence rate in every cycle and the factors reducing regorafenib adherence. Additionally, very little has been published on adherence and persistence to oral molecular targeted therapies in solid malignancies.13 The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate adherence and patient profiles that can help predict poor adherence in mCRC patients receiving regorafenib.

Patients And Methods

Patients

This was a retrospective observational study to examine the clinical factors that may affect regorafenib adherence. Data from 108 consecutive Japanese patients with mCRC who received regorafenib between May 18, 2013 and March 31, 2015 at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research were enrolled. Patients received regorafenib (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) 160 mg once daily for the first three weeks of each 4-week cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. To prevent hand-foot-skin reactions, heparinoid ointment was applied to the hands and feet, and clobetasol propionate was applied at the time of symptom onset. Patients treated with regorafenib were followed-up on day 1, day 8, and day 15 until the end of the 3rd cycle.

Data Collection

Adherence to regorafenib was assessed using pill counts and patient-reported treatment diaries, and non-adherents were interviewed about the reasons for not taking regorafenib at a pharmaceutical outpatient clinic at every patient visit. The pill count was performed by counting the number of regorafenib pills remaining unused whenever the patient visited the outpatient clinic. All participants in this study visited a pharmaceutical outpatient clinic and completed the study. The adherence rate in a cycle was calculated as the number of times a patient took regorafenib/21. Median relative dose intensities14 of regorafenib and factors associated with reduced adherence were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the clinical research ethics review committee at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (approval no: 2015–1042). The all patients provided written informed consent in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Pharmaceutical Outpatient Clinic

In our hospital, proactive intervention by pharmacists to check adherence and side effects (which are one cause of non-adherence) is considered necessary, and a pharmaceutical outpatient clinic is helpful for patients undergoing oral chemotherapy treatment.15,16 The main tasks of the pharmaceutical outpatient clinic were: to check the regorafenib treatment diary (Bayer) for regorafenib adherence and leftover medication; to propose prescription support for regorafenib and supportive pharmacotherapy; and assessment of side effects such as the hand-foot-skin reaction and hypertension. In practice, prescription support for regorafenib consists of a pharmacist recording the regorafenib dose and administration period required for the next cycle in the electronic medical record. This is then checked and authorized by a physician to enable the prescription to be issued. If any regorafenib is left over from the previous cycle, the prescribed amount is adjusted accordingly.

Statistical Analysis

The primary endpoint was adherence, dichotomized according to success defined as an adherence rate ≥ 90% in the first cycle. Univariate analyses were then performed using socio-demographic factors (sex, age (≥ 70 years vs. < 70 years), living status (alone vs. with others), and marital status) and clinical factors (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, adverse events (Grade ≥3), and number of systemic medications (≥ 6)). The factors that were significant on univariate analysis were entered into the multivariate analysis. Significance levels for uni- and multivariate analyses were set at p < 0.2 and p < 0.05, respectively. Odds ratios and p-values were computed for the variables in logistic regression models. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 24.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

Results

Patients And Characteristics

A total of 108 patients were extracted from the outpatient pharmacy information systems in the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research. Among then, 12 patients were excluded. The reasons for exclusion were no data collected (n=10) and change in hospital during the first cycle (n=2) (Figure 1). Clinical characteristics and socio-demographic data for the 96 patients analyzed are reported in Table 1. The median age of the patients was 62.5 years (range, 34–83 years), and more than half of the patients were female. The majority of the patients had an ECOG performance status of 0. In terms of living status, 82 patients (85.4%) were living with family, and 14 patients (14.6%) were living alone. In almost 90% of patients, regorafenib was administered as 3rd-line or later. The total number of regorafenib treatments was 185 cycles.
Figure 1

Flow chart of patients and reasons for exclusion.

Table 1

Clinical And Socio-Demographic Characteristics Of The Study Population

CharacteristicNo. Patients (n=96)%
Median age, years (range)62.5 (34–83)
Gender
 Male/Female46/5047.9/52.1
ECOG performance status
 0/1/261/35/063.5/36.5/0
Primary tumor site
 Colon/Rectal/Others60/31/562.5/32.3/5.2
Living status
 With family/Alone82/1485.4/14.6
Marital status
 Married/Not married74/2277.1/22.9
ECOG performance status
 PS 1/PS 261/3563.5/36.5
Grade ≥3 adverse events
 Yes/No56/4058.3/41.7
Number of internal medications
 < 5/≥674/2277.1/22.9
Number of prior regimens
 244.2
 32930.2
 45658.3
 577.3
Duration of use (cycles) Total185

Abbreviation: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Clinical And Socio-Demographic Characteristics Of The Study Population Abbreviation: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Flow chart of patients and reasons for exclusion.

Adherence Rate

Figure 2 shows the regorafenib adherence rate determined at the pharmaceutical outpatient clinic using the pill count and patient-reported treatment diaries. No cases of over-adherence (defined as adherence rate > 100%) were found. The rate of patients who completed regorafenib to the third cycle was 4.2% (4 patients). The median adherence rate was 61.7% (n=96) in the first cycle, 77.5% (n=68) in the second cycle, and 84.3% (n=34) in the third cycle. The median relative dose intensity of regorafenib in this study was 57.1%.
Figure 2

Regorafenib adherence rate in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during cycles 1–3. The adherence rate was calculated as the median adherence rate for each cycle from pill counts and a self-reported treatment diary for patients at a pharmaceutical outpatient clinic.

Regorafenib adherence rate in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during cycles 1–3. The adherence rate was calculated as the median adherence rate for each cycle from pill counts and a self-reported treatment diary for patients at a pharmaceutical outpatient clinic.

Factors Reducing Regorafenib Adherence

In total, non-adherence was seen in 92 patients (95.8%), with 1120 instances. The most common reasons for non-adherence were hand-foot-skin reactions (35.6%, 399 instances), fever (13.8%, 155 instances), liver dysfunction (13.2%, 148 instances), and rash (9.3%, 104 instances) (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Factors reducing adherence to regorafenib treatment (n=1120 instances). Progression disease discontinued regorafenib treatment during its course, and these instances were counted as progression disease.

Factors reducing adherence to regorafenib treatment (n=1120 instances). Progression disease discontinued regorafenib treatment during its course, and these instances were counted as progression disease.

Multivariate Model Of Factors Associated With Adherence

The results of the multivariate analysis are shown in Table 2. Univariate analyses identified sex, living status, and adverse events (Grade ≥3) as possible risk factors for predicting a < 90% adherence rate within the 1st cycle. A significant association was found for sex (female) [odds ratio (OR) = 4.36; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.43–13.22; p = 0.01] on logistic regression analysis.
Table 2

Logistic Regression Analysis Of Socio-Demographic And Clinical Factors For An Adherence Rate < 90% In The First Cycle

Univariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
VariableOR (95% CI)p‐valueOR (95% CI)p‐value
Socio-demographic factors
 Gender (female)4.36 (1.43–13.22)0.01*4.36 (1.43–13.22)0.01*
 Age (≥70 years)0.76 (0.26–2.15)0.60
 Living Status (Living alone)3.92 (0.48–31.94)0.17
 Marriage (Not married)1.89 (0.50–7.16)0.27
Clinical factors
 ECOG performance status (≥1)1.44 (0.50–4.17)0.50
 Adverse events (Grade ≥3)3.37 (1.20–9.46)0.02*
 Number of systemic medications (≥6)3.21 (0.68–15.1)0.10

Note: *P < 0.05.

Abbreviation: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Logistic Regression Analysis Of Socio-Demographic And Clinical Factors For An Adherence Rate < 90% In The First Cycle Note: *P < 0.05. Abbreviation: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Discussion

In many previous studies, the dose intensity of oral anticancer agents was determined only by the amount of medicine prescribed.17 Thus, whether patients were adherent at home was not known. The present study examined not only the median relative dose intensity of regorafenib but also the median adherence rate determined by pharmacists by pill counts and patient-reported treatment diaries. Moreover, female sex was found to be a factor decreasing regorafenib adherence. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a clinical factor that affects adherence to regorafenib with mCRC. In the present study, the median regorafenib adherence rate was 61.7% in Japanese patients. However, it was reported that the average regorafenib adherence rate was 82.0% in a previous study that was conducted in Italy.12 These data suggest that the regorafenib adherence rate is lower in Japanese patients than in non- Japanese patients. Accumulated data from clinical trials have suggested that there are ethnic differences in the incidence of regorafenib treatment-related adverse events, with a higher incidence of serious adverse events in the Japanese subpopulation compared with the non-Japanese subpopulation.10,11,18 In the CORRECT trial, regorafenib treatment-related adverse events were clearly higher in the Japanese subpopulation than in the non-Japanese subpopulation, including hand-foot-skin reaction (80 vs 42%) and hypertension (60 vs 23%) of any grade.19 The median dose intensity of regorafenib was 71.4% (range 9.5–100.0%) in the Japanese subpopulation, while it was 83.3% (range 9.5–114.3%) in the non-Japanese subpopulation.19 The present data are consistent with the previous reports, and ethnic difference may cause lower adherence in Asians. The present study showed that female sex was significantly associated with lower regorafenib adherence in mCRC patients. In general, female sex has been associated with lower adherence not only in cancer, but also in other diseases.20,21 It has been reported that female sex was associated with lower imatinib adherence in adult chronic myeloid leukemia.22 Adverse effects of imatinib include rash, edema, and weight gain. Because women are more concerned with their appearance, this issue may be related to the lower adherence in females. Interestingly, in the present study, Grade ≥2 rash/desquamation occurred in 5 patients, all of whom were female. All of them stopped taking regorafenib immediately. These data support the finding that females have lower regorafenib adherence than males. The present study identified the factors for non-adherence to regorafenib. The major reasons for lower regorafenib adherence were subjective symptoms such as hand-foot-skin reaction, fever, rash, and pain. The relative dose intensity represents the ratio of the amount of drug prescribed to the amount planned for a fixed time period. On the other hand, adherence represents patients’ actual medication-taking behavior. This concept contains the actual amount of drug taken. Therefore, it is important to assess not only the relative dose intensity of regorafenib, but also the adherence.23 Several limitations of this paper should be taken into consideration. In this study, relevant patient-related factors that might be related to adherence, such as education, were not examined.24,25 In general, highly educated patients are more adherent.26,27 Another limitation of this study include its retrospective nature and small sample size from a single institute. These limitations make firm conclusions difficult. Nevertheless, the present data are important for demonstrating the clinical factors that may affect adherence to regorafenib in Japanese patients with mCRC. In conclusion, the median regorafenib adherence rate was 61.7% in the first cycle, and the most common reason for non-adherence was a hand-foot-skin reaction. Female sex was associated with lower regorafenib adherence, careful dose reduction and interruption of regorafenib are required for female patients.
  26 in total

1.  Use and costs of oral anticancer agents in the Netherlands in the period 2000-2008.

Authors:  Lonneke Timmers; Jan Jacob Beckeringh; Myrthe P P van Herk-Sukel; Epie Boven; Jacqueline G Hugtenburg
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 2.  Adherence influencing factors in patients taking oral anticancer agents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tim Mathes; Dawid Pieper; Sunya-Lee Antoine; Michaela Eikermann
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Persistence and determinants of statin therapy among middle-aged patients for primary and secondary prevention.

Authors:  S Perreault; L Blais; D Lamarre; A Dragomir; D Berbiche; L Lalonde; C Laurier; F St-Maurice; J Collin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Adherence and safety of regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: observational real-life study.

Authors:  Salvatore Del Prete; Gregorio Cennamo; Luigi Leo; Liliana Montella; Bruno Vincenzi; Maria Biglietto; Francesca Andreozzi; Antonella Prudente; Patrizia Iodice; Clementina Savastano; Anna Nappi; Vincenzo Montesarchio; Raffaele Addeo
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 5.  Oral antineoplastic agents: how do we care about adherence?

Authors:  Marie Barillet; Virginie Prevost; Florence Joly; Bénédicte Clarisse
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Adherence and patients' experiences with the use of oral anticancer agents.

Authors:  Lonneke Timmers; Christel C L M Boons; Femke Kropff; Peter M van de Ven; Eleonora L Swart; Egbert F Smit; Sonja Zweegman; Judith R Kroep; Johanna N H Timmer-Bonte; Epie Boven; Jacqueline G Hugtenburg
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Robin DiMatteo; Patrick J Giordani; Heidi S Lepper; Thomas W Croghan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Axel Grothey; Eric Van Cutsem; Alberto Sobrero; Salvatore Siena; Alfredo Falcone; Marc Ychou; Yves Humblet; Olivier Bouché; Laurent Mineur; Carlo Barone; Antoine Adenis; Josep Tabernero; Takayuki Yoshino; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent; Frank Cihon; Lisa Cupit; Andrea Wagner; Dirk Laurent
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The use of regorafenib for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  Sang Eun Yoon; Su Jin Lee; Jeeyun Lee; Se Hoon Park; Joon Oh Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Won Ki Kang; Young Suk Park; Seung Tae Kim
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Regorafenib-Induced Hand-Foot Skin Reaction Is More Severe on the Feet Than on the Hands.

Authors:  Yuma Nonomiya; Takashi Yokokawa; Kazuyoshi Kawakami; Kazuo Kobayashi; Takeshi Aoyama; Tomomi Takiguchi; Takahito Sugisaki; Kenichi Suzuki; Mitsukuni Suenaga; Takeru Wakatsuki; Kensei Yamaguchi; Yoshikazu Sugimoto; Toshihiro Hama
Journal:  Oncol Res       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.574

View more
  3 in total

1.  Associations among plasma concentrations of regorafenib and its metabolites, adverse events, and ABCG2 polymorphisms in patients with metastatic colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Kazuo Kobayashi; Erika Sugiyama; Eiji Shinozaki; Takeru Wakatsuki; Masataka Tajima; Hiyori Kidokoro; Takeshi Aoyama; Yasuhiro Nakano; Kazuyoshi Kawakami; Koki Hashimoto; Mitsukuni Suenaga; Takashi Ichimura; Mariko Ogura; Keisho Chin; Izuma Nakayama; Akira Ooki; Daisuke Takahari; Wataru Suzuki; Takashi Yokokawa; Yuichi Minowa; Tomoko Hiraoka; Kenichi Suzuki; Hitoshi Sato; Toshihiro Hama; Kensei Yamaguchi
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Dose reduction and discontinuation of standard-dose regorafenib associated with adverse drug events in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Rizzo; Margherita Nannini; Marco Novelli; Angela Dalia Ricci; Valerio Di Scioscio; Maria Abbondanza Pantaleo
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 3.  Patients' Experience of Systemic Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of the Impact on Quality of Life.

Authors:  Léa Muzellec; Héloïse Bourien; Julien Edeline
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.