Literature DB >> 31686370

Multi-level Drivers of Disparities in Hispanic Cesarean Delivery Rates in US-Mexico Border States.

Jill A McDonald1,2, Anup Amatya3,4, Charlotte C Gard4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hispanic women living along the US-Mexico border have higher cesarean delivery rates than non-Hispanic white women, African American women, and other Hispanic women in the USA. Their rates also exceed those of other Hispanic women in states that border Mexico and non-Hispanic white women along the border. Our objective was to determine the causes of the disparities in border Hispanic cesarean rates.
METHODS: Using the 2015 birth certificate file and other sources, we performed a twofold Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition analysis of the disparities in low-risk primary and repeat cesarean rates between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women in the US-Mexico border counties and Hispanic women residing in nonborder counties of border states.
RESULTS: Rates of low-risk primary cesarean among border Hispanic, nonborder Hispanic, and border non-Hispanic white women were 21.1%, 15.0%, and 16.5%, respectively. Higher Hispanic concentration in county of residence, a larger proportion of for-profit hospital beds, and greater poverty accounted for 24.7%, 22.1%, and 11.1% of the border-nonborder Hispanic difference, respectively. No other variable explained more than 5% of the difference. Higher Hispanic concentration, more for-profit beds, less attendance by an MD, higher BMI, and greater poverty explained 60.6%, 42.4%, 42.4%, 27.4%, and 21.3%, respectively, of the Hispanic-non-Hispanic white difference. Hispanic concentration and for-profit beds were also important explanatory variables for low-risk repeat cesareans.
CONCLUSION: Efforts to address potentially unnecessary cesareans among Hispanic women on the border should recognize that community demographic and health delivery system characteristics are more influential than maternal medical risk factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; Health disparities; Hispanic Americans; Oaxaca-Blinder; Poverty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31686370     DOI: 10.1007/s40615-019-00652-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities        ISSN: 2196-8837


  28 in total

1.  Geographic variation in the appropriate use of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Katherine Baicker; Kasey S Buckles; Amitabh Chandra
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Diminishing availability of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in New Mexico hospitals.

Authors:  Lawrence M Leeman; Melissa Beagle; Eve Espey; Tony Ogburn; Betty Skipper
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Hospital-ownership status and cesareans in the United States: The effect of for-profit hospitals.

Authors:  Theresa Morris; Kelly McNamara; Christine H Morton
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Maternal Morbidity for Vaginal and Cesarean Deliveries, According to Previous Cesarean History: New Data From the Birth Certificate, 2013.

Authors:  Sally C Curtin; Kimberly D Gregory; Lisa M Korst; Sayeedha Fg Uddin
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2015-05-20

5.  Validation of selected items on the 2003 U.S. standard certificate of live birth: New York City and Vermont.

Authors:  Patricia Dietz; Jennifer Bombard; Candace Mulready-Ward; John Gauthier; Judith Sackoff; Peggy Brozicevic; Melissa Gambatese; Michael Nyland-Funke; Lucinda England; Leslie Harrison; Sherry Farr
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Factors associated with increased cesarean risk among African American women: evidence from California, 2010.

Authors:  Marco Huesch; Jason N Doctor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Using the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition as an empirical tool to analyze racial disparities in obesity.

Authors:  Bisakha Sen
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004-2006: the case against case-mix artifact.

Authors:  Isabel A Cáceres; Mariana Arcaya; Eugene Declercq; Candice M Belanoff; Vanitha Janakiraman; Bruce Cohen; Jeffrey Ecker; Lauren A Smith; S V Subramanian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Obstetric care and method of delivery in Mexico: results from the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey.

Authors:  Ileana Heredia-Pi; Edson E Servan-Mori; Veronika J Wirtz; Leticia Avila-Burgos; Rafael Lozano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Determination of a single, universal threshold for caesarean section rate is not the way forward.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Jun Zhang; Maria Regina Torloni; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Evid Based Med       Date:  2016-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.