Literature DB >> 3168205

Rate and delta checks compared for selected chemistry tests.

D A Lacher1, D P Connelly.   

Abstract

We compared delta and "rate" check methods for 12 selected chemistry tests. Rate checks were determined by dividing delta checks by inter-specimen interval time. The delta and rate check methods were based on differences and percent change of untransformed and absolute value-transformed values. The distribution of delta differences was not symmetrical for calcium, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, or phosphorus, which led to different check limits between untransformed and absolute value-transformed methods. The dispersion of rate checks was large. The interval time between two consecutive tests was multimodal, which probably reflected adherence to fixed testing protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3168205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  7 in total

1.  Integrating decision support, based on the Arden Syntax, in a clinical laboratory environment.

Authors:  B Johansson; Y Bergqvist
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1993

2.  How useful are delta checks in the 21 century? A stochastic-dynamic model of specimen mix-up and detection.

Authors:  Katie Ovens; Christopher Naugler
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2012-02-29

3.  Autoverification in a core clinical chemistry laboratory at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Matthew D Krasowski; Scott R Davis; Denny Drees; Cory Morris; Jeff Kulhavy; Cheri Crone; Tami Bebber; Iwa Clark; David L Nelson; Sharon Teul; Dena Voss; Dean Aman; Julie Fahnle; John L Blau
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2014-03-28

4.  Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Zhongqing Wang; Cheng Peng; Hui Kang; Xia Fan; Runqing Mu; Liping Zhou; Miao He; Bo Qu
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Combined strategy of knowledge-based rule selection and historical data percentile-based range determination to improve an autoverification system for clinical chemistry test results.

Authors:  Jing Zhu; Hao Wang; Beili Wang; Xiaoke Hao; Wei Cui; Yong Duan; Yi Zhang; Liang Ming; Yingchun Zhou; Haitao Ding; Hongling Ou; Weiwei Lin; Liu Lu; Yuanjiang Shang; Yong Yang; Xianming Liang; Jiangtao Ma; Wenhua Sun; Te Chen; Guang Han; Meng Han; Weiting Yu; Baishen Pan; Wei Guo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  New decision criteria for selecting delta check methods based on the ratio of the delta difference to the width of the reference range can be generally applicable for each clinical chemistry test item.

Authors:  Sang Hyuk Park; So-Young Kim; Woochang Lee; Sail Chun; Won-Ki Min
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Jinyoung Hong; Eun-Jung Cho; Hyun-Ki Kim; Woochang Lee; Sail Chun; Won-Ki Min
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 3.124

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.