| Literature DB >> 31681627 |
Yingdong Li1, Xin Li1, Zhibin Han1, Weibin Xu1, Xiaodong Li1, Qijun Chen1.
Abstract
Parasitic isopods perforate and attach to the host integument via the mandibles and then feed on hemolymph and exudate from the wounds. Such isopods attack a variety of commercially important fish and crustacean hosts. Similar to other hematophagous parasites, isopods may also employ biomolecules that affect host blood conglutination and defense systems. In the present study, a tandem mass tag-based quantitative proteomic approach was used to identify differentially expressed proteins in Tachaea chinensis parasites of shrimp, by comparing parasitic (fed) and pre-parasitic (unfed) individuals. We identified 888 proteins from a total of 1,510 peptides, with a significant difference in 129 between the fed and unfed groups. Among these, 37 were upregulated and 92 were downregulated in unfed T. chinensis. This indicates that T. chinensis may require more energy before parasitism during its search for a host. In addition, as is the case for other blood-sucking parasites, it might secrete antihemostatic, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory molecules to facilitate blood meal acquisition. To our knowledge, this study is the first to use a TMT-based proteomic approach to analyze the proteome of isopod parasites, and the results will facilitate our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of isopod parasitism on crustaceans.Entities:
Keywords: Tachaea chinensis; blood-sucking; comparative proteomic; during parasitism; isopod parasite
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31681627 PMCID: PMC6798089 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00350
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Total numbers of tandem mass spectrometry spectra (MS/MS spectrum), peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs), peptides, unique peptides, and proteins in Tachaea chinensis.
Figure 2Distribution of identified proteins with different molecular weights (the weight and pI values are for the target proteins from the NCBI_Peracarida_91190_20190313.fasta database).
Figure 3Volcano plot of all proteins identified in the proteome database, for the fed and unfed parasite groups. Yellow points: differentially expressed proteins that were significantly downregulated after parasitism (fold change > 1.2; p < 0.05). Green points: differentially expressed proteins that were significantly upregulated after parasitism (fold change < 0.8; p < 0.05).
Figure 4GO functional classification of the identified proteins of the top 10 pathways identified in the proteome database, for the fed and unfed parasite groups, in the biological process, cell component, and molecular function categories.
Figure 5KEGG annotation of the top five pathways from the proteome database of the fed and unfed parasite groups.
Figure 6Protein-protein interaction network analysis of the three major network groups.
Differentially expressed proteins involved in energy and digestive metabolism, comparing the fed and unfed Tachaea chinensis.
| 1371969814 | Calcium-transporting ATPase sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum type-like | 13.89 | 13 | 36 | 1,001 | 109.50 | 5.52 | 1.20 | 0.04 |
| 1067084430 | NADH dehydrogenase flavoprotein 1, mitochondrial-like | 8.55 | 3 | 3 | 468 | 50.90 | 8.21 | 1.20 | 0.01 |
| 1547583175 | Na+/K+-ATPase, partial | 29.70 | 5 | 9 | 202 | 22.40 | 6.77 | 1.28 | 0.02 |
| 1246309936 | Sodium potassium ATPase alpha subunit, partial | 25.99 | 5 | 9 | 227 | 25.20 | 5.39 | 1.28 | 0.01 |
| 26324131 | Smooth endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase | 18.96 | 17 | 46 | 1,002 | 109.70 | 5.36 | 1.32 | 0.01 |
| 1220106012 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (mitochondrion) | 3.56 | 1 | 1 | 309 | 34.70 | 8.88 | 1.41 | 0.00 |
| 1561970059 | Cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein 1 | 1.98 | 1 | 1 | 353 | 37.50 | 7.56 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
| 1371969117 | Phosphoglucomutase | 3.02 | 1 | 1 | 563 | 61.40 | 5.26 | 0.68 | 0.00 |
| 1562001515 | Trehalase | 1.46 | 1 | 1 | 548 | 62.80 | 5.26 | 0.73 | 0.03 |
| 262305275 | Glycogen synthase, partial | 6.31 | 2 | 3 | 317 | 36.20 | 7.64 | 0.85 | 0.01 |
| 1067085998 | UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B14-like | 3.85 | 1 | 5 | 156 | 17.80 | 9.57 | 0.76 | 0.00 |
| 1371968467 | Fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase | 8.33 | 2 | 3 | 276 | 30.00 | 5.35 | 0.78 | 0.01 |
| 1371966397 | Kynurenine–oxoglutarate transaminase 3-like, partial | 2.69 | 1 | 2 | 484 | 53.90 | 7.71 | 0.83 | 0.00 |
| 1562032021 | Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 7 | 1.18 | 1 | 1 | 1,267 | 145.50 | 5.77 | 0.83 | 0.04 |
| 1067064770 | Aminopeptidase N-like | 0.59 | 1 | 2 | 1,851 | 208.50 | 4.91 | 0.63 | 0.00 |
| 1371969475 | 26S protease regulatory subunit 6B | 5.56 | 3 | 3 | 414 | 46.70 | 5.58 | 0.65 | 0.00 |
| 1562025605 | Protein disulfide-isomerase A6 | 2.27 | 1 | 1 | 441 | 48.30 | 5.57 | 0.68 | 0.01 |
| 1371970147 | Nucleoside diphosphate kinase | 7.73 | 1 | 2 | 181 | 20.20 | 8.40 | 0.74 | 0.01 |
| 1562030658 | Protein disulfide-isomerase | 5.17 | 3 | 4 | 522 | 58.70 | 4.77 | 0.75 | 0.00 |
| 1371969013 | Dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide–protein glycosyltransferase subunit STT3A-like | 1.66 | 1 | 1 | 722 | 82.10 | 7.87 | 0.78 | 0.01 |
| 1562029772 | Ubiquitin-protein ligase E3C | 0.87 | 1 | 2 | 1,032 | 117.50 | 6.76 | 0.78 | 0.01 |
| 1371965865 | Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 4 regulatory subunit 1-like | 0.52 | 1 | 1 | 1,340 | 149.30 | 4.65 | 0.80 | 0.00 |
| 1562011562 | Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP7 | 13.81 | 4 | 7 | 210 | 23.50 | 4.79 | 0.80 | 0.00 |
| 1562027280 | Proteasome subunit beta type-5 | 4.61 | 1 | 2 | 282 | 31.50 | 6.65 | 0.85 | 0.02 |
| 1561992339 | Putative serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PP2A regulatory subunit | 10.44 | 4 | 5 | 479 | 53.00 | 5.21 | 0.85 | 0.02 |
| 1562029772 | Ubiquitin-protein ligase E3C | 0.87 | 1 | 2 | 1,032 | 117.50 | 6.76 | 0.78 | 0.01 |
| 1562030180 | Fatty acid synthase | 0.57 | 1 | 2 | 2,263 | 248.70 | 5.49 | 0.81 | 0.02 |
Differentially expressed proteins involved in blood sucking, comparing the fed and unfed Tachaea chinensis.
| 427782987 | Putative salivary alkaline phosphatase | 1.68 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 535.00 | 0.45 | 6.60 |
| 1561973869 | Barrier-to-autointegration factor | 11.11 | 1 | 1 | 90 | 10.1 | 5.90 | 0.67 | 0.02 |
| 1067116995 | Inorganic pyrophosphatase-like isoform X1 | 3.41 | 1 | 1 | 410 | 46.2 | 5.08 | 0.72 | 0.00 |
| 1067085871 | Calcineurin subunit B type 2 isoform X1 | 4.69 | 1 | 1 | 213 | 23.5 | 4.97 | 0.75 | 0.02 |
| 1067070998 | Neurocalcin homolog isoform X3 | 10.53 | 2 | 2 | 190 | 21.9 | 5.25 | 0.74 | 0.01 |
| 164632859 | Alpha-2-macroglobulin, partial | 3.85 | 2 | 3 | 571 | 61.7 | 4.94 | 0.75 | 0.00 |
| 1562026595 | Calreticulin, partial | 13.03 | 3 | 5 | 330 | 38.4 | 4.93 | 0.81 | 0.00 |
| 1202288454 | Insulin receptor substrate 2-B, partial | 2.35 | 1 | 1 | 426 | 46.2 | 6.38 | 0.82 | 0.01 |
| 1067101392 | Mitogen-activated protein kinase 14B-like | 4.08 | 1 | 1 | 392 | 44.0 | 7.30 | 0.82 | 0.03 |
| 1562031882 | PI-actitoxin-Aeq3a | 6.51 | 1 | 1 | 169 | 19.5 | 4.81 | 0.83 | 0.02 |
| 1562036618 | Bleomycin hydrolase | 4.76 | 1 | 1 | 252 | 29.0 | 6.64 | 0.85 | 0.04 |
| 1371956987 | Peroxiredoxin, partial | 9.65 | 1 | 1 | 114 | 12.4 | 5.48 | 1.20 | 0.03 |
| 1371959777 | Galactose ABC transporter substrate-binding protein | 3.26 | 1 | 1 | 337 | 37.1 | 5.03 | 1.50 | 0.00 |
| 190014500 | 70 kDa heat shock protein | 7.64 | 4 | 10 | 641 | 70.1 | 5.53 | 0.72 | 0.00 |
| 1561987640 | Endoplasmin | 3.99 | 3 | 5 | 803 | 92.1 | 5.02 | 0.77 | 0.00 |
| 1561990168 | 60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrial | 14.19 | 8 | 13 | 571 | 60.5 | 5.41 | 0.81 | 0.01 |
| 1371970216 | Heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha-like | 7.49 | 5 | 7 | 708 | 82.0 | 5.05 | 0.83 | 0.00 |
| 1371965305 | Stress-activated protein kinase JNK-like | 3.14 | 1 | 1 | 509 | 57.2 | 7.40 | 0.83 | 0.04 |
| 1562029713 | Putative heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha A4 | 10.86 | 5 | 8 | 488 | 55.7 | 5.08 | 0.83 | 0.00 |
Figure 7Verification of the expression profiles of randomly selected significantly changed proteins comparing the fed and unfed T. chinensis groups, as determined by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) and tandem mass tag (TMT) analysis. The data on the relative expression of proteins, for use in the TMT analysis, were obtained from Tables 1, 2. The data on the relative expression of proteins for use in the PRM analysis were calculated relative to the expression of the relabeled peptide GISNEGQNASIK*.