Literature DB >> 31681475

Mechanism of formation governs the mechanism of release of antibiotics from calcium phosphate nanopowders and cements in a drug-dependent manner.

Vuk Uskoković1.   

Abstract

The kinetics of drug release from hydroxyapatite (HAp) cements could be tuned by controlling the kinetics of crystallization of their HAp precursor powders during synthesis. Here it is shown that this history of formation affects not only the kinetics, but also the mechanism of release. Cements composed of two HAp powders precipitated under different conditions, one (HAp2) taking twice longer to transform from the amorphous to the crystalline state than the other (HAp1), were mixed at different ratios to tune their drug release kinetics and tested for the release mechanism in conjunction with compositional and microstructural analyses. While the cement component converting to the amorphous phase during gelation (HAp2) exhibited a faster, but also more anomalous, non-Fickian mechanism of release of vancomycin, the cement component retaining its crystalline state all throughout gelation, setting and hardening (HAp1) stabilized at the ideal, Fickian diffusion case corresponding to the Korsmeyer-Peppas exponent value of 0.45 ± 0.02. This effect got reversed for the other antibiotic studied as a drug, ciprofloxacin, in which case HAp2 exhibited the ideal, Fickian diffusion with n = 0.45 ± 0.02 and the increase in the content of the cement component retaining its crystallinity during gelation, setting and hardening (HAp1) steadily shifted the mechanism of release to more anomalous, non-Fickian types. This has indicated that the molecular structure of the drug is an essential determinant of the mechanism of release and that the design of a carrier for a universally tunable release of drugs based on the passive transport is likely impossible. Preliminary assays involving the addition of chitosan or gelatin as polymeric components to HAp led to the inclusion of swelling and erosion as additional effects by which the drug escapes the carrier and shifted the release toward less diffusional and more multimodal mechanisms. With regard to the microstructural and compositional effects governing the release mechanism and kinetics, the retention of a finite concentration of slit-like pores of the amorphous precursor in HAp2 and its lower surface energy and lesser drug binding potential in the gelled, amorphous state, but also its possibly less stable and more diffusive particle surface and higher structural water content were elaborated as potential reasons explaining the distinct rates and mechanisms of release from the two HAp powders with different histories of formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31681475      PMCID: PMC6824273          DOI: 10.1039/c9tb00444k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Chem B        ISSN: 2050-750X            Impact factor:   6.331


  34 in total

1.  Lipophilic drug loaded nanospheres prepared by nanoprecipitation: effect of formulation variables on size, drug recovery and release kinetics.

Authors:  Michael Chorny; Ilia Fishbein; Haim D Danenberg; Gershon Golomb
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2002-10-30       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Multifluorescently traceable nanoparticle by a single-wavelength excitation with color-related drug release performance.

Authors:  Deli Lu; Juying Lei; Lingzhi Wang; Jinlong Zhang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Composite resin vs resin cement for luting of indirect restorations: comparison of solubility and shrinkage behavior.

Authors:  Tissiana Bortolotto; Davy Guillarme; Daniel Gutemberg; Jean-Luc Veuthey; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 4.  Adaptive crystal formation in normal and pathological calcifications in synthetic calcium phosphate and related biomaterials.

Authors:  G Daculsi; J M Bouler; R Z LeGeros
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1997

5.  Diffusion-Controlled Drug Release From the Mesoporous Magnesium Carbonate Upsalite(®).

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Teresa Zardán Gómez de la Torre; Johan Forsgren; Christel A S Bergström; Maria Strømme
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.534

6.  1. Commentary on an exponential model for the analysis of drug delivery: Original research article: a simple equation for description of solute release: I II. Fickian and non-Fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs, 1987.

Authors:  Nicholas A Peppas
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 7.  Carriers for the tunable release of therapeutics: etymological classification and examples.

Authors:  Vuk Uskoković; Shreya Ghosh
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 8.  Recent progress on fabrication and drug delivery applications of nanostructured hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Sudip Mondal; Sergy V Dorozhkin; Umapada Pal
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2017-11-23

9.  Development and optimization of hydroxyapatite-ofloxacin implants for possible bone delivery in osteomyelitis treatment.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Nayak; M Saquib Hasnain; Jadupati Malakar
Journal:  Curr Drug Deliv       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Tunable sustained intravitreal drug delivery system for daunorubicin using oxidized porous silicon.

Authors:  Huiyuan Hou; Alejandra Nieto; Feiyan Ma; William R Freeman; Michael J Sailor; Lingyun Cheng
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 9.776

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of zinc content on the microstructure, in vitro bioactivity, and corrosion behavior of the microarc oxidized Mg-xZn-0.6Ca (x = 3.0, 4.5, 6.0) alloy.

Authors:  Jingtao Wang; Yaokun Pan; Wei Wang; Hongwei Cui; Rui Feng; Xiaoli Cui; Benkui Gong; Xingchuan Zhao; Ning Hou
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.456

Review 2.  Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles for Therapeutic Applications in Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Tanya J Levingstone; Simona Herbaj; Nicholas J Dunne
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.076

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.