Literature DB >> 24088842

Composite resin vs resin cement for luting of indirect restorations: comparison of solubility and shrinkage behavior.

Tissiana Bortolotto1, Davy Guillarme, Daniel Gutemberg, Jean-Luc Veuthey, Ivo Krejci.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate relationship between shrinkage development and early solubility of two commonly used luting materials, a self-adhesive cement (GCem chemical and light cured) and composite resin (Tetric). Linear displacement, shrinkage forces and leaching of UDMA from specimens immersed in 75% ethanol/25% water were measured. The least amount of linear shrinkage (33.0±2.9 µm) and polymerization force (4.1±0.3 kg) was observed in Tetric. UDMA leaching (% µg/mL) was the following: chemically cured GCem (4.2±0.2)>light cured GCem (1.5±0.1)>Tetric (0.1). Shrinkage development in the early stages of polymerization was much slower in the self-cured specimens in respect to light cured ones. With the chemically cured self-adhesive cement, incomplete materials' setting during the initial stages after polymerization favored monomer leaching from the cements' mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24088842     DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2013-153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater J        ISSN: 0287-4547            Impact factor:   2.102


  8 in total

1.  Mechanism of formation governs the mechanism of release of antibiotics from calcium phosphate nanopowders and cements in a drug-dependent manner.

Authors:  Vuk Uskoković
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 6.331

2.  Effects of coronal substrates and water storage on the microhardness of a resin cement used for luting ceramic crowns.

Authors:  Luana Menezes de Mendonça; Luiz Fernando Pegoraro; Marcos Daniel Septímio Lanza; Thiago Amadei Pegoraro; Ricardo Marins de Carvalho
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Does hybridized dentin affect bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement?

Authors:  Saulo Pamato; Accácio-Lins do Valle; Gustavo-Henrique-Barbosa de Andrade; Hugo-Alberto Vidotti; Marcus-Vinícius-Reis Só; Jefferson-Ricardo Pereira
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-10-01

4.  Bond strength of adhesive resin cement with different adhesive systems.

Authors:  Fabrizio Lorenzoni E Silva; Saulo Pamato; Milton-Carlos Kuga; Marcus-Vinicius-Reis Só; Jefferson-Ricardo Pereira
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-01-01

5.  Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Thomas Reboul; H A Hoang Thaï; Sibel Cetik; Ramin Atash
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

6.  Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ján Staněk; Abanoub Riad; Adam Le; Matěj Bernát; Milad Hammal; Basel Azar
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Microleakage of Four Dental Cements in Metal Ceramic Restorations With Open Margins.

Authors:  Reza Eftekhar Ashtiani; Babak Farzaneh; Mohadese Azarsina; Farzad Aghdashi; Nima Dehghani; Aisooda Afshari; Minu Mahshid
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 0.611

8.  Increasing Acid Concentration, Time and Using a Two-Part Silane Potentiates Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate-Reinforced Glass Ceramic to Resin Composite: An Exploratory Laboratory Study.

Authors:  Matilde Almiro; Beatriz Marinho; António H S Delgado; João Rua; Paulo Monteiro; Inês Caetano Santos; Luís Proença; José João Mendes; Marco M M Gresnigt
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.