Literature DB >> 31680733

Prevalence of metal hypersensitivity in total knee replacement.

Mohan M Desai1, Kunal Ajitkumar Shah1, Anuradha Mohapatra2, Digen C Patel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous and local reactions to metals used in orthopaedic implants have been well documented. The prevalence of metal sensitivity in general population is 10%-15%. Nickel, Cobalt and Chromium are the most common allergen. The association between cutaneous reactions and implants has been less understood. Hence, this study was taken up with the aim to assess the prevalence of metal hypersensitivity in Total Knee Replacement (TKR) patients and find the most prevalent allergen. MATERIALS &
METHODS: Longitudinal study conducted during January-December 2017. We enrolled 233 subjects who were at least three months postoperative. Radiological assessment was done. CREDISOL® kit was used for patch test. Results were recorded using ICDRG grading at 48 hours and five days.
RESULTS: Mean age was 59.59 years; 12.01% were symptomatic. Pain followed by loss of function were the most common symptoms. However, loss of function and patient dissatisfaction towards procedure were significantly associated with metal hypersensitivity (χ2 value > 3.84; p value < 0.05). In 66% subjects, pre-operative diagnosis was severe osteoarthritis, followed by rheumatoid arthritis (23%). None of the subjects had evidence of loosening on X-ray. Prevalence of Metal Hypersensitivity was found to be 15.87% (patch test positive). Chromium (11.58%) was found to be most common allergen followed by Nickel (8.58%) and then Cobalt (6.43%).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant prevalence of metal hypersensitivity was found. Therefore, we recommend pre-operative patch test for detecting allergic reactions to implants. Alternatives like Titanium or Zirconium can be used to avoid complications.
© 2019 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Aseptic loosening; Hypersensitivity; Metal allergy; Metal hypersensitivity; Patch test; Patch testing; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement

Year:  2019        PMID: 31680733      PMCID: PMC6818373          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  21 in total

1.  Factors associated with delayed complications in patients with a hinge arthroplasty of the knee.

Authors:  M Webley; M L Snaith; A Kates
Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil       Date:  1978-08

2.  Considerations of allergy and mechanics in the selection of orthopaedic implant materials [proceedings].

Authors:  S A Brown; K Merritt; M B Mayor
Journal:  Bull Hosp Joint Dis       Date:  1977-10

Review 3.  Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  N Hallab; K Merritt; J J Jacobs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Outcomes of Revision Joint Arthroplasty Due to Metal Allergy and Hypersensitivity: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Julio J Jauregui; Shivam J Desai; Vaughn Hodges; Arun Hariharan; Jared M Newman; Farshad Adib; Aditya V Maheshwari
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2018-11-11

5.  Incidence of metal sensitivity in patients with total joint replacements.

Authors:  M W Elves; J N Wilson; J T Scales; H B Kemp
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-11-15

6.  Metal sensitivity in patients with joint replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  M K Benson; P G Goodwin; J Brostoff
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-11-15

Review 7.  Metal hypersensitivity testing in patients undergoing joint replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  D Granchi; E Cenni; A Giunti; N Baldini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-08

8.  Severe persistent synovitis after cobalt-chromium total knee arthroplasty requiring revision.

Authors:  Raman R Thakur; Michael P Ast; Michael McGraw; Mathias P Bostrom; Jose A Rodriguez; Michael L Parks
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Screening for symptomatic metal sensitivity: a prospective study of 92 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Hideo Matsumoto; Toshiro Otani; Taku Yatabe; Makoto Kondo; Fumihiro Yoshimine; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Evaluation and management of metal hypersensitivity in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Amini; Wesley H Mayes; Alice Tzeng; Tony H Tzeng; Khaled J Saleh; William M Mihalko
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2014
View more
  5 in total

1.  Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes after two different hypoallergenic medial unicompartmental knee in patients with metal allergy.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Nicola Ursino; Ilaria Mariani; Katia Corona; Filippo Maria Anghilieri; Emanuele Franchi; Lorenzo Monti
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-05-29

2.  No Clinical or Radiographic Differences Between Cemented Cobalt-Chromium and Titanium-Niobium Nitride Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Rafael Loucas; Marios Loucas; Riccardo Giorgino; Nicola Ursino; Giuseppe Maria Peretti
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Self-reported metal hypersensitivity in patients undergoing unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Halis Atıl Atilla; Hüseyin Bilgehan Çevik; Mutlu Akdoğan; Hakan Aslan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-05

Review 4.  The effect of Nickel hypersensitivity on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty and the value of skin patch testing: a systematic review.

Authors:  C J H Peacock; H Fu; V Asopa; N D Clement; D Kader; D H Sochart
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-09-02

5.  Aortic valve replacement in a patient with self-reported systemic multiple metal allergy.

Authors:  Saori Nagura; Mari Sakai; Hayato Obi; Kazuaki Fukahara
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-09-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.