Literature DB >> 31679767

Integrative analysis of prognostic biomarkers derived from multiomics panels helps discrimination of chronic kidney disease trajectories in people with type 2 diabetes.

Michael Kammer1, Andreas Heinzel2, Jill A Willency3, Kevin L Duffin3, Gert Mayer4, Kai Simons5, Mathias J Gerl5, Christian Klose5, Georg Heinze6, Roman Reindl-Schwaighofer2, Karin Hu2, Paul Perco4, Susanne Eder4, Laszlo Rosivall7, Patrick B Mark8, Wenjun Ju9, Matthias Kretzler9, Mark I McCarthy10, Hiddo L Heerspink11, Andrzej Wiecek12, Maria F Gomez13, Rainer Oberbauer14.   

Abstract

Clinical risk factors explain only a fraction of the variability of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline in people with type 2 diabetes. Cross-omics technologies by virtue of a wide spectrum screening of plasma samples have the potential to identify biomarkers for the refinement of prognosis in addition to clinical variables. Here we utilized proteomics, metabolomics and lipidomics panel assay measurements in baseline plasma samples from the multinational PROVALID study (PROspective cohort study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for VALIDation of biomarkers) of patients with incident or early chronic kidney disease (median follow-up 35 months, median baseline eGFR 84 mL/min/1.73 m2, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio 8.1 mg/g). In an accelerated case-control study, 258 individuals with a stable eGFR course (median eGFR change 0.1 mL/min/year) were compared to 223 individuals with a rapid eGFR decline (median eGFR decline -6.75 mL/min/year) using Bayesian multivariable logistic regression models to assess the discrimination of eGFR trajectories. The analysis included 402 candidate predictors and showed two protein markers (KIM-1, NTproBNP) to be relevant predictors of the eGFR trajectory with baseline eGFR being an important clinical covariate. The inclusion of metabolomic and lipidomic platforms did not improve discrimination substantially. Predictions using all available variables were statistically indistinguishable from predictions using only KIM-1 and baseline eGFR (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.63). Thus, the discrimination of eGFR trajectories in patients with incident or early diabetic kidney disease and maintained baseline eGFR was modest and the protein marker KIM-1 was the most important predictor.
Copyright © 2019 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; chronic kidney disease; integrative analysis; multiomics; prognosis; type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31679767     DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  14 in total

1.  Circulating Plasma Biomarkers in Biopsy-Confirmed Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Insa M Schmidt; Suraj Sarvode Mothi; Parker C Wilson; Ragnar Palsson; Anand Srivastava; Ingrid F Onul; Zoe A Kibbelaar; Min Zhuo; Afolarin Amodu; Isaac E Stillman; Helmut G Rennke; Benjamin D Humphreys; Sushrut S Waikar
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Machine learning for risk stratification in kidney disease.

Authors:  Faris F Gulamali; Ashwin S Sawant; Girish N Nadkarni
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 3.  Precision Nephrology in Patients with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Michele Provenzano; Federica Maritati; Chiara Abenavoli; Claudia Bini; Valeria Corradetti; Gaetano La Manna; Giorgia Comai
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  KIM-1 mediates fatty acid uptake by renal tubular cells to promote progressive diabetic kidney disease.

Authors:  Yutaro Mori; Amrendra K Ajay; Jae-Hyung Chang; Shan Mou; Huiping Zhao; Seiji Kishi; Jiahua Li; Craig R Brooks; Sheng Xiao; Heung-Myong Woo; Venkata S Sabbisetti; Suetonia C Palmer; Pierre Galichon; Li Li; Joel M Henderson; Vijay K Kuchroo; Julie Hawkins; Takaharu Ichimura; Joseph V Bonventre
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 27.287

5.  Comparison of serum and urinary biomarker panels with albumin/creatinine ratio in the prediction of renal function decline in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Marco Colombo; Stuart J McGurnaghan; Luke A K Blackbourn; R Neil Dalton; David Dunger; Samira Bell; John R Petrie; Fiona Green; Sandra MacRury; John A McKnight; John Chalmers; Andrew Collier; Paul M McKeigue; Helen M Colhoun
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Predictive Biomarkers in Nephrology Around the Corner.

Authors:  Paul Perco; Kumar Sharma
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2019-11-02

Review 7.  Use of an Exposome Approach to Understand the Effects of Exposures From the Natural, Built, and Social Environments on Cardio-Vascular Disease Onset, Progression, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Paul D Juarez; Darryl B Hood; Min-Ae Song; Aramandla Ramesh
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-08-12

Review 8.  Digital pathology and computational image analysis in nephropathology.

Authors:  Laura Barisoni; Kyle J Lafata; Stephen M Hewitt; Anant Madabhushi; Ulysses G J Balis
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 9.  Integrative Biology of Diabetic Retinal Disease: Lessons from Diabetic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Warren W Pan; Thomas W Gardner; Jennifer L Harder
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Current Challenges and Future Perspectives of Renal Tubular Dysfunction in Diabetic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Suyan Duan; Fang Lu; Dandan Song; Chengning Zhang; Bo Zhang; Changying Xing; Yanggang Yuan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.