Gökçe Güllü Amuran1, Ilker Tinay2, Deniz Filinte3, Can Ilgin4, Irem Peker Eyüboğlu1, Mustafa Akkiprik5. 1. Department of Medical Biology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Başıbüyük Campus, Başıbüyük Mah. Maltepe Başıbüyük Yolu Sok. No:9/2, Maltepe, 34854, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, 34854, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, 34854, Istanbul, Turkey. 4. Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Marmara University, 34899, Istanbul, Turkey. 5. Department of Medical Biology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Başıbüyük Campus, Başıbüyük Mah. Maltepe Başıbüyük Yolu Sok. No:9/2, Maltepe, 34854, Istanbul, Turkey. makkiprik@marmara.edu.tr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine expression differences of urine exosomal miR-19b1-5p, 21-5p, 136-3p, 139-5p, 210-3p and concentration differences of urinary BLCA-4, NMP22, APE1/Ref1, CRK, VIM between bladder cancer, follow-up patients, and control samples, to evaluate diagnostic importance of these differences and establish a diagnostic panel for bladder cancer. METHODS: Urine samples of 59 bladder cancer patients, 34 healthy controls, and 12 follow-up patients without recurrence were enrolled to this study. Real-time PCR and ELISA were performed to determine urine exosomal miR-19b1-5p, 21-5p, 136-3p, 139-5p, 210-3p expressions and urinary BLCA-4, NMP22, APE1/Ref1, CRK, VIM, creatinine concentrations. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic panel, the sensitivity, and specificity of the panel assessed by the ROC curve analysis. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In bladder cancer risk groups, mir-139, -136, -19 and 210 expressions or positivity were found to be different and concentrations of urinary Ape1/Ref1, BLCA4, CRK, and VIM increased by twofold on average compared to healthy controls. Logistic regression and ROC analyses revealed that panel could differentiate bladder cancer patients from healthy controls with 80% sensitivity and 88% specificity (AUC = 0.899), low-risk patients from controls with 93% sensitivity and 95.5% specificity (AUC = 0.976). Despite the low number of samples, our findings suggest that urine exosomal miR-19b1-5p, 136-3p, 139-5p expression, and urinary APE1/Ref1, BLCA-4, CRK concentrations are promising candidates in terms of bladder cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although our panel has great sensitivity for early detection of BC, it needs to be validated in larger populations.
PURPOSE: To determine expression differences of urine exosomal miR-19b1-5p, 21-5p, 136-3p, 139-5p, 210-3p and concentration differences of urinary BLCA-4, NMP22, APE1/Ref1, CRK, VIM between bladder cancer, follow-up patients, and control samples, to evaluate diagnostic importance of these differences and establish a diagnostic panel for bladder cancer. METHODS: Urine samples of 59 bladder cancerpatients, 34 healthy controls, and 12 follow-up patients without recurrence were enrolled to this study. Real-time PCR and ELISA were performed to determine urine exosomal miR-19b1-5p, 21-5p, 136-3p, 139-5p, 210-3p expressions and urinary BLCA-4, NMP22, APE1/Ref1, CRK, VIM, creatinine concentrations. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic panel, the sensitivity, and specificity of the panel assessed by the ROC curve analysis. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In bladder cancer risk groups, mir-139, -136, -19 and 210 expressions or positivity were found to be different and concentrations of urinary Ape1/Ref1, BLCA4, CRK, and VIM increased by twofold on average compared to healthy controls. Logistic regression and ROC analyses revealed that panel could differentiate bladder cancerpatients from healthy controls with 80% sensitivity and 88% specificity (AUC = 0.899), low-risk patients from controls with 93% sensitivity and 95.5% specificity (AUC = 0.976). Despite the low number of samples, our findings suggest that urine exosomal miR-19b1-5p, 136-3p, 139-5p expression, and urinary APE1/Ref1, BLCA-4, CRK concentrations are promising candidates in terms of bladder cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although our panel has great sensitivity for early detection of BC, it needs to be validated in larger populations.
Authors: H Zhou; P S T Yuen; T Pisitkun; P A Gonzales; H Yasuda; J W Dear; P Gross; M A Knepper; R A Star Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Susanne Deininger; J Hennenlotter; S Rausch; K Docktor; E Neumann; I A da Costa; J Bedke; A Stenzl; T Todenhöfer Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: G Mowatt; S Zhu; M Kilonzo; C Boachie; C Fraser; T R L Griffiths; J N'Dow; G Nabi; J Cook; L Vale Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Nikhil Sapre; Geoff Macintyre; Michael Clarkson; Haroon Naeem; Marek Cmero; Adam Kowalczyk; Paul D Anderson; Anthony J Costello; Niall M Corcoran; Christopher M Hovens Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Rafaela Malinaric; Guglielmo Mantica; Lorenzo Lo Monaco; Federico Mariano; Rosario Leonardi; Alchiede Simonato; André Van der Merwe; Carlo Terrone Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-05 Impact factor: 4.614