Literature DB >> 20082749

Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of photodynamic diagnosis and urine biomarkers (FISH, ImmunoCyt, NMP22) and cytology for the detection and follow-up of bladder cancer.

G Mowatt1, S Zhu, M Kilonzo, C Boachie, C Fraser, T R L Griffiths, J N'Dow, G Nabi, J Cook, L Vale.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) compared with white light cystoscopy (WLC), and urine biomarkers [fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), ImmunoCyt, NMP22] and cytology for the detection and follow-up of bladder cancer. DATA SOURCES: Major electronic databases including MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Science Citation Index, Health Management Information Consortium and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched until April 2008. REVIEW
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out according to standard methods. An economic model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of alternative diagnostic and follow-up strategies for the diagnosis and management of patients with bladder cancer.
RESULTS: In total, 27 studies reported PDD test performance. In pooled estimates [95% confidence interval (CI)] for patient-level analysis, PDD had higher sensitivity than WLC [92% (80% to 100%) versus 71% (49% to 93%)] but lower specificity [57% (36% to 79%) versus 72% (47% to 96%)]. Similar results were found for biopsy-level analysis. The median sensitivities (range) of PDD and WLC for detecting lower risk, less aggressive tumours were similar for patient-level detection [92% (20% to 95%) versus 95% (8% to 100%)], but sensitivity was higher for PDD than for WLC for biopsy-level detection [96% (88% to 100%) versus 88% (74% to 100%)]. For more aggressive, higher-risk tumours the median sensitivity of PDD for both patient-level [89% (6% to 100%)] and biopsy-level [99% (54% to 100%)] detection was higher than those of WLC [56% (0% to 100%) and 67% (0% to 100%) respectively]. Four RCTs comparing PDD with WLC reported effectiveness outcomes. PDD use at transurethral resection of bladder tumour resulted in fewer residual tumours at check cystoscopy [relative risk, RR, 0.37 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.69)] and longer recurrence-free survival [RR 1.37 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.59)] compared with WLC. In 71 studies reporting the performance of biomarkers and cytology in detecting bladder cancer, sensitivity (95% CI) was highest for ImmunoCyt [84% (77% to 91%)] and lowest for cytology [44% (38% to 51%)], whereas specificity was highest for cytology [96% (94% to 98%)] and lowest for ImmunoCyt [75% (68% to 83%)]. In the cost-effectiveness analysis the most effective strategy in terms of true positive cases (44) and life-years (11.66) [flexible cystoscopy (CSC) and ImmunoCyt followed by PDD in initial diagnosis and CSC followed by WLC in follow-up] had an incremental cost per life-year of over 270,000 pounds. The least effective strategy [cytology followed by WLC in initial diagnosis (average cost over 20 years 1403 pounds, average life expectancy 11.59)] was most likely to be considered cost-effective when society's willingness to pay was less than 20,000 pounds per life-year. No strategy was cost-effective more than 50% of the time, but four of the eight strategies in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis (three involving a biomarker or PDD) were each associated with a 20% chance of being considered cost-effective. In sensitivity analyses the results were most sensitive to the pretest probability of disease (5% in the base case).
CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of PDD's higher sensitivity in detecting bladder cancer have to be weighed against the disadvantages of a higher false-positive rate. Taking into account the assumptions made in the model, strategies involving biomarkers and/or PDD provide additional benefits at a cost that society might be willing to pay. Strategies replacing WLC with PDD provide more life-years but it is unclear whether they are worth the extra cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20082749     DOI: 10.3310/hta14040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


  83 in total

1.  Systematic support for photodynamic diagnosis.

Authors:  Suzanne J Farley
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  [Urine cytology - update 2013. A systematic review of recent literature].

Authors:  M Böhm; F vom Dorp; M Schostak; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Aftercare of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer].

Authors:  G B Schulz; B Schlenker; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Developing proteomic biomarkers for bladder cancer: towards clinical application.

Authors:  Maria Frantzi; Agnieszka Latosinska; Leif Flühe; Marie C Hupe; Elena Critselis; Mario W Kramer; Axel S Merseburger; Harald Mischak; Antonia Vlahou
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Proteomic studies of urinary biomarkers for prostate, bladder and kidney cancers.

Authors:  Steven L Wood; Margaret A Knowles; Douglas Thompson; Peter J Selby; Rosamonde E Banks
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  [Therapy of low-grade nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer].

Authors:  P J Olbert; C H Ohlmann; C Schwentner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Emerging Roles of Urine-Based Tumor DNA Analysis in Bladder Cancer Management.

Authors:  Aadel A Chaudhuri; Bruna Pellini; Nadja Pejovic; Pradeep S Chauhan; Peter K Harris; Jeffrey J Szymanski; Zachary L Smith; Vivek K Arora
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-07-15

8.  [Non-muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. New developments in diagnostics and therapy].

Authors:  M Sommerauer; D Jocham; J M Laturnus
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Prospective evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization for diagnosing urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Tianhai Lin; Zhenhua Liu; Liangren Liu; Lu Yang; Ping Han; Peng Zhang; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  High-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: update for a better identification and treatment.

Authors:  Oscar Rodriguez Faba; Joan Palou; Alberto Breda; H Villavicencio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.