Ziyang Sun1, Juehong Li1, Haomin Cui1, Hongjiang Ruan1, Wei Wang2, Cunyi Fan3. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China; Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China. 3. Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China; Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: cyfan@sjtu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. This study aimed to develop a new pathologic classification to further understand and standardize elbow arthrolysis from a new perspective, as well as to determine clinical outcomes. METHODS: Extension-flexion dysfunction was classified into 4 types: EFI, tethers alone; EFII, tethers with blocks; EFIII, articular malformation; and EFIV, bony ankylosis. Forearm rotation dysfunction was classified into 3 types: FRI, contracture alone; FRII, radial head malunion or nonunion; and FRIII, proximal radioulnar bony ankylosis. A total of 216 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included and categorized preoperatively. All surgical procedures were performed by the same chief surgeon; different types underwent specific procedures. Patient data, elbow motion, and functional scores were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean range of motion (ROM) increased from 40° preoperatively to 118° at final follow-up; 88% of patients regained ROM of 100° or greater. The forearm rotation arc (FRA) with forearm rotation dysfunction increased from a preoperative mean of 76° to 128°; 82% of patients regained an FRA of 100° or greater. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) increased from 63 to 91 points; the proportion of patients with good or excellent results was 95%. EFI patients had the best ROM (129°) and MEPI (93 points) and EFIV patients achieved the most-changed ROM (116°), whereas EFIII patients had the worst ROM (104°) and MEPI (84 points) and the least-changed ROM (64°). The FRA was best in FRI patients (142°), followed by FRII patients (118°), and worst in FRIII patients (82°); in contrast, the changed FRA was greatest in FRIII patients (82°), followed by FRII patients (64°), and least in FRI patients (37°). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the proposed pathologic classification provides a new perspective on the understanding and standardization of elbow arthrolysis, providing satisfactory clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND:Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. This study aimed to develop a new pathologic classification to further understand and standardize elbow arthrolysis from a new perspective, as well as to determine clinical outcomes. METHODS:Extension-flexion dysfunction was classified into 4 types: EFI, tethers alone; EFII, tethers with blocks; EFIII, articular malformation; and EFIV, bony ankylosis. Forearm rotation dysfunction was classified into 3 types: FRI, contracture alone; FRII, radial head malunion or nonunion; and FRIII, proximal radioulnar bony ankylosis. A total of 216 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included and categorized preoperatively. All surgical procedures were performed by the same chief surgeon; different types underwent specific procedures. Patient data, elbow motion, and functional scores were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean range of motion (ROM) increased from 40° preoperatively to 118° at final follow-up; 88% of patients regained ROM of 100° or greater. The forearm rotation arc (FRA) with forearm rotation dysfunction increased from a preoperative mean of 76° to 128°; 82% of patients regained an FRA of 100° or greater. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) increased from 63 to 91 points; the proportion of patients with good or excellent results was 95%. EFI patients had the best ROM (129°) and MEPI (93 points) and EFIV patients achieved the most-changed ROM (116°), whereas EFIII patients had the worst ROM (104°) and MEPI (84 points) and the least-changed ROM (64°). The FRA was best in FRI patients (142°), followed by FRII patients (118°), and worst in FRIII patients (82°); in contrast, the changed FRA was greatest in FRIII patients (82°), followed by FRII patients (64°), and least in FRI patients (37°). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the proposed pathologic classification provides a new perspective on the understanding and standardization of elbow arthrolysis, providing satisfactory clinical outcomes.