Martin Hoenigl1, Susan J Little1, David Grelotti2, Britt Skaathun1, Gabriel A Wagner1, Nadir Weibel3, Jamila K Stockman1, Davey M Smith1,4. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 4. Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Technology has changed the way that men who have sex with men (MSM) seek sex. More than 60% of MSM in the United States use the internet and/or smartphone-based geospatial networking apps to find sex partners. We correlated use of the most popular app (Grindr) with sexual risk and prevention behavior among MSM. METHODS: A nested cohort study was conducted between September 2018 and June 2019 among MSM receiving community-based human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening in central San Diego. During the testing encounter, participants were surveyed for demographics, substance use, risk behavior (previous 3 months), HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use, and Grindr usage. Participants who tested negative for HIV and who were not on PrEP were offered immediate PrEP. RESULTS: The study included 1256 MSM, 1090 of whom (86.8%) were not taking PrEP. Overall, 580 of 1256 (46%) participants indicated that they used Grindr in the previous 7 days. Grindr users reported significantly higher risk behavior (greater number of male partners and condomless sex) and were more likely to test positive for chlamydia or gonorrhea (8.6% vs 4.7% of nonusers; P = .005). Grindr users were also more likely to be on PrEP (18.7% vs 8.7% of nonusers; P < .001) and had fewer newly diagnosed HIV infections (9 vs 26 among nonusers; P = .014). Grindr users were also nearly twice as likely as nonusers to initiate PrEP (24.6% vs 14%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Given the higher risk behavior and greater acceptance of PrEP among MSM who used Grindr, Grindr may provide a useful platform to promote HIV and STI testing and increase PrEP uptake.
BACKGROUND: Technology has changed the way that men who have sex with men (MSM) seek sex. More than 60% of MSM in the United States use the internet and/or smartphone-based geospatial networking apps to find sex partners. We correlated use of the most popular app (Grindr) with sexual risk and prevention behavior among MSM. METHODS: A nested cohort study was conducted between September 2018 and June 2019 among MSM receiving community-based human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening in central San Diego. During the testing encounter, participants were surveyed for demographics, substance use, risk behavior (previous 3 months), HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use, and Grindr usage. Participants who tested negative for HIV and who were not on PrEP were offered immediate PrEP. RESULTS: The study included 1256 MSM, 1090 of whom (86.8%) were not taking PrEP. Overall, 580 of 1256 (46%) participants indicated that they used Grindr in the previous 7 days. Grindr users reported significantly higher risk behavior (greater number of male partners and condomless sex) and were more likely to test positive for chlamydia or gonorrhea (8.6% vs 4.7% of nonusers; P = .005). Grindr users were also more likely to be on PrEP (18.7% vs 8.7% of nonusers; P < .001) and had fewer newly diagnosed HIV infections (9 vs 26 among nonusers; P = .014). Grindr users were also nearly twice as likely as nonusers to initiate PrEP (24.6% vs 14%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Given the higher risk behavior and greater acceptance of PrEP among MSM who used Grindr, Grindr may provide a useful platform to promote HIV and STI testing and increase PrEP uptake.
Authors: Gregory Phillips; Manya Magnus; Irene Kuo; Anthony Rawls; James Peterson; Yujiang Jia; Jenevieve Opoku; Alan E Greenberg Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2014-09
Authors: Philip A Chan; Christina Crowley; Jennifer S Rose; Trace Kershaw; Alec Tributino; Madeline C Montgomery; Alexi Almonte; Julia Raifman; Rupa Patel; Amy Nunn Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Matthew R Beymer; Robert E Weiss; Robert K Bolan; Ellen T Rudy; Linda B Bourque; Jeffrey P Rodriguez; Donald E Morisky Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Lisa A Eaton; Jessica L Maksut; Kristi E Gamarel; Elizabeth J Siembida; Daniel D Driffin; Robert Baldwin Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: A Lina Rosengren; Emily Huang; Joseph Daniels; Sean D Young; Robert W Marlin; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: Sex Health Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 2.706
Authors: Pavlo Smyrnov; Leslie D Williams; Ania Korobchuk; Yana Sazonova; Georgios K Nikolopoulos; Britt Skaathun; Ethan Morgan; John Schneider; Tetyana I Vasylyeva; Samuel R Friedman Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Martin Hoenigl; Christy M Anderson; Nella Green; Sanjay R Mehta; Davey M Smith; Susan J Little Journal: BMC Med Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Rebecca Lillis; Jeremy Beckford; Joshua Fegley; Julia Siren; Bruce Hinton; Samuel Gomez; Stephanie N Taylor; Isolde Butler; Jason Halperin; Meredith Edwards Clement Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2021-08-26 Impact factor: 5.944
Authors: Martin Hoenigl; Megan Lo; Christopher J Coyne; Gabriel A Wagner; Jill Blumenthal; Kushagra Mathur; Lucy E Horton; Thomas C S Martin; Gary M Vilke; Susan J Little Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2021-11-27
Authors: Jennifer K Felner; Maria L Mittal; Martin Hoenigl; K Rivet Amico; David J Grelotti; Alex Eanes; Kristen Hess; Jessica Crawford; Laramie R Smith Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 3.771
Authors: Elizabeth Fearon; Adam Bourne; Siyanda Tenza; Thesla Palanee-Phillips; Rhoda Kabuti; Peter Weatherburn; Will Nutland; Joshua Kimani; Adrian D Smith Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Suraj Balakrishna; Luisa Salazar-Vizcaya; Axel J Schmidt; Viacheslav Kachalov; Katharina Kusejko; Maria Christine Thurnheer; Jan A Roth; Dunja Nicca; Matthias Cavassini; Manuel Battegay; Patrick Schmid; Enos Bernasconi; Huldrych F Günthard; Andri Rauch; Roger D Kouyos Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2021-10-26 Impact factor: 4.475