| Literature DB >> 31677359 |
Toshiko Kamata1,2, Shigetoshi Yoshida1, Mariko Takami2, Fumie Ihara2, Hiroko Yoshizawa2, Takahide Toyoda2,3, Yuichiro Takeshita4, Seiichi Nobuyama4, Yukiko Kanetsuna5, Tetsuo Sato4, Ichiro Yoshino3, Shinichiro Motohashi2.
Abstract
The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic lung cancer has been established in recent years and the pretherapeutic profiles of the tumor microenvironment in responders have been increasingly reported. The role of salvage surgery and the immune profiles of the posttherapeutic specimens in patients achieving an objective response have rarely been studied. We report a case of metastatic lung cancer treated by anti-programmed death-1 Ab followed by surgical resection. The immune status of the tumor was assessed, showing germinal center formation, memory B cell infiltration, and a high frequency of interferon gamma -secreting T cells.Entities:
Keywords: anti-PD-1 antibody; immunotherapy; lung cancer; surgery; tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31677359 PMCID: PMC6942425 DOI: 10.1111/cas.14222
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Sci ISSN: 1347-9032 Impact factor: 6.716
Figure 1Pathological findings in a lung cancer patient treated with anti‐programmed death‐1 blockade therapy. A, Victoria blue‐H&E staining of the resected lung. The tumor bed showed dense fibrosis (I) with lymphocyte infiltration (II) and vasculitis (III). Germinal centers were found in the tumor bed and normal lung (IV). B, Pathology of the initial transbronchial biopsy specimen. H&E staining (upper panels) revealed sheets of atypical cells with little keratinization. Immunohistochemistry for CD4, CD8, and L26 (lower panels). C, Immunohistochemistry of the resected specimen with L26 (upper left panel), CD3 (upper right panel), CD8 (lower left panel), and CD4 (lower right panel)
Figure 2Flow cytometric analysis of mononuclear cells in a lung cancer patient treated with anti‐programmed death‐1 blockade therapy. A‐C, Flow cytometric analysis for CD45+ lymphocytes and percentages of each subset. D, Results of intracellular staining for Foxp3: effector regulatory T (eTreg) cells, CD3+CD4+CD45RA−foxp3high cells; naïve regulatory T (nTreg) cells, CD3+CD4+CD45RA+foxp3low cells. Percentages of eTreg cells are depicted on the left lower panel. Interleukin (IL)‐10‐secreting CD19+ cells following stimulation are depicted on the right lower panel. E, Results of intracellular staining for interferon‐gamma (IFNγ)
Figure 3Flow cytometric analysis and functional assays on B cells. A, Flow cytometric data on CD19+CD20+ cells and percentage of B‐cell subsets. B, Positivity of CD86, CD83, CD80 (population comparison method), and CD40 (median fluorescence intensity; MFI). Purified CD19+ cells were simulated with oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) 2006. C, Surface staining of stimulated (ODN) or nonstimulated cells (Ctrl) after 24 h. The shaded histogram is the isotype control. The MFI of CD40 is depicted. D, Results of cytometric bead arrays (CBA) on cell culture supernatants, carried out in duplicate. E, CBA analysis for immunoglobulins were undertaken on day 7. The average and SD of 2 different wells are depicted. TNF, tumor necrosis factor