Literature DB >> 3167722

Auditory-evoked responses of dogs with different hearing abilities.

K E Knowles1, W C Cash, B S Blauch.   

Abstract

Sixteen dogs were separated into three groups, based on clinical impressions of their abilities to hear and historical information pertaining to their hearing loss: group I (n = 7) had normal hearing, group II (n = 4) had reduced hearing and group III (n = 5) were deaf. Monaural clicks of alternating polarities were used to elicit brainstem auditory-evoked responses. The responses of the normal group and of the reduced hearing group consistently had four major peaks (I, II, III-IV, V) with latencies similar to those previously reported in dogs with normal hearing. No difference (p greater than or equal to 0.05) was found in mean latencies of the four major waveforms when comparing the normal group with the reduced hearing group. Significant reductions in mean amplitudes of waves I (p less than 0.01) and II (p less than 0.025) were found in the reduced hearing group. No recognizable waves could be recorded from the deaf group, indicating a lack of peripheral auditory function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3167722      PMCID: PMC1255471     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  15 in total

1.  Far-field acoustic response: origins in the cat.

Authors:  J S Buchwald; C Huang
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Volume-conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat.

Authors:  D L Jewett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-06

3.  Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. II. Effects of lesions.

Authors:  L J Achor; A Starr
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-02

4.  Auditory brainstem responses in the aged cat.

Authors:  J Harrison; J Buchwald
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Brainstem auditory evoked response in the diagnosis of inner ear injury in the horse.

Authors:  A E Marshall; T D Byars; R H Whitlock; L W George
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1981-02-01       Impact factor: 1.936

6.  Brain stem auditory evoked response development in the kitten.

Authors:  C Shipley; J S Buchwald; R Norman; D Guthrie
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-01-27       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Effects of age and sex on auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  J Jerger; J Hall
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1980-07

8.  Hearing in the dog as assessed by auditory brainstem evoked potentials.

Authors:  R Kay; A C Palmer; P M Taylor
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1984-01-28       Impact factor: 2.695

9.  Genetic hearing impairment in the Dalmatian dog. An audiometric, genetic and morphologic study in 53 dogs.

Authors:  H Anderson; B Henricson; P G Lundquist; E Wedenberg; J Wersäll
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Effects of neomycin on the waveform of auditory-evoked brain stem potentials in dogs.

Authors:  J L Morgan; D B Coulter; A E Marshall; D D Goetsch
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 1.156

View more
  5 in total

1.  Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in cattle sedated with xylazine.

Authors:  Shozo Arai
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Comparison of the efficacy of 2 sedative protocols in pediatric dogs undergoing brainstem auditory-evoked response testing.

Authors:  Alejandra García de Carellán Mateo; Elena Ríos Álvarez; Carlos Ros
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Peaks of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in dogs.

Authors:  Y Kawasaki; S Inada
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Effects of high dietary sulfur on brain functions using evoked potentials technique.

Authors:  A A Olkowski; S R Gooneratne; E C Crichlow; C G Rousseaux; D A Christensen
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  Relationship between hearing, cognitive function, and quality of life in aging companion dogs.

Authors:  Gilad Fefer; Michael Z Khan; Wojciech K Panek; Beth Case; Margaret E Gruen; Natasha J Olby
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 3.175

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.