Literature DB >> 31676688

Residues and residue pairs of evolutionary importance differentially direct signaling bias of D2 dopamine receptors.

María E Terrón-Díaz1,2, Sara J Wright3, Melina A Agosto3, Olivier Lichtarge1,3,4, Theodore G Wensel5.   

Abstract

The D2 dopamine receptor and the serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptor (5-HT2A) are closely-related G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) from the class A bioamine subfamily. Despite structural similarity, they respond to distinct ligands through distinct downstream pathways, whose dysregulation is linked to depression, bipolar disorder, addiction, and psychosis. They are important drug targets, and it is important to understand how their bias toward G-protein versus β-arrestin signaling pathways is regulated. Previously, evolution-based computational approaches, difference Evolutionary Trace and Evolutionary Trace-Mutual information (ET-Mip), revealed residues and residue pairs that, when switched in the D2 receptor to the corresponding residues from 5-HT2A, altered ligand potency and G-protein activation efficiency. We have tested these residue swaps for their ability to trigger recruitment of β-arrestin2 in response to dopamine or serotonin. The results reveal that the selected residues modulate agonist potency, maximal efficacy, and constitutive activity of β-arrestin2 recruitment. Whereas dopamine potency for most variants was similar to that for WT and lower than for G-protein activation, potency in β-arrestin2 recruitment for N124H3.42 was more than 5-fold higher. T205M5.54 displayed high constitutive activity, enhanced dopamine potency, and enhanced efficacy in β-arrestin2 recruitment relative to WT, and L379F6.41 was virtually inactive. These striking differences from WT activity were largely reversed by a compensating mutation (T205M5.54/L379F6.41) at residues previously identified by ET-Mip as functionally coupled. The observation that the signs and relative magnitudes of the effects of mutations in several cases are at odds with their effects on G-protein activation suggests that they also modulate signaling bias.
© 2019 Terrón-Díaz et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G protein; G-protein–coupled receptor (GPCR); allosteric regulation; arrestin; cell signaling; dopamine; dopamine receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31676688      PMCID: PMC6916503          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.008068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  51 in total

1.  Evolution-guided discovery and recoding of allosteric pathway specificity determinants in psychoactive bioamine receptors.

Authors:  Gustavo J Rodriguez; Rong Yao; Olivier Lichtarge; Theodore G Wensel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Agonist-induced conformational changes in bovine rhodopsin: insight into activation of G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Supriyo Bhattacharya; Spencer E Hall; Nagarajan Vaidehi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Phosphorylation of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: From the Barcode Hypothesis to the Flute Model.

Authors:  Zhao Yang; Fan Yang; Daolai Zhang; Zhixin Liu; Amy Lin; Chuan Liu; Peng Xiao; Xiao Yu; Jin-Peng Sun
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  α-Lipoic acid interaction with dopamine D2 receptor-dependent activation of the Akt/GSK-3β signaling pathway induced by antipsychotics: potential relevance for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jessica Deslauriers; Christian Desmarais; Philippe Sarret; Sylvain Grignon
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.444

5.  beta-arrestin-dependent, G protein-independent ERK1/2 activation by the beta2 adrenergic receptor.

Authors:  Sudha K Shenoy; Matthew T Drake; Christopher D Nelson; Daniel A Houtz; Kunhong Xiao; Srinivasan Madabushi; Eric Reiter; Richard T Premont; Olivier Lichtarge; Robert J Lefkowitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  A regulator of G protein signaling interaction surface linked to effector specificity.

Authors:  M E Sowa; W He; T G Wensel; O Lichtarge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Resistance exercise decreases heroin self-administration and alters gene expression in the nucleus accumbens of heroin-exposed rats.

Authors:  Mark A Smith; Gaylen E Fronk; Jean M Abel; Ryan T Lacy; Sarah E Bills; Wendy J Lynch
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  AKT/GSK3 signaling pathway and schizophrenia.

Authors:  Effat S Emamian
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.639

9.  Beyond cAMP: The Regulation of Akt and GSK3 by Dopamine Receptors.

Authors:  Jean-Martin Beaulieu; Thomas Del'guidice; Tatyana D Sotnikova; Morgane Lemasson; Raul R Gainetdinov
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.639

10.  The action of a negative allosteric modulator at the dopamine D2 receptor is dependent upon sodium ions.

Authors:  Christopher J Draper-Joyce; Ravi Kumar Verma; Mayako Michino; Jeremy Shonberg; Anitha Kopinathan; Carmen Klein Herenbrink; Peter J Scammells; Ben Capuano; Ara M Abramyan; David M Thal; Jonathan A Javitch; Arthur Christopoulos; Lei Shi; J Robert Lane
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.