Literature DB >> 31673963

Predicting the quality of surgical exposure using spatial and procedural features from laparoscopic videos.

Arthur Derathé1, Fabian Reche1,2, Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry1,3, Pierre Jannin4,5, Bernard Gibaud4,5, Sandrine Voros6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE : Evaluating the quality of surgical procedures is a major concern in minimally invasive surgeries. We propose a bottom-up approach based on the study of Sleeve Gastrectomy procedures, for which we analyze what we assume to be an important indicator of the surgical expertise: the exposure of the surgical scene. We first aim at predicting this indicator with features extracted from the laparoscopic video feed, and second to analyze how the extracted features describing the surgical practice influence this indicator. METHOD : Twenty-nine patients underwent Sleeve Gastrectomy performed by two confirmed surgeons in a monocentric study. Features were extracted from spatial and procedural annotations of the videos, and an expert surgeon evaluated the quality of the surgical exposure at specific instants. The features were used as input of a classifier (linear discriminant analysis followed by a support vector machine) to predict the expertise indicator. Features selected in different configurations of the algorithm were compared to understand their relationships with the surgical exposure and the surgeon's practice. RESULTS : The optimized algorithm giving the best performance used spatial features as input ([Formula: see text]). It also predicted equally the two classes of the indicator, despite their strong imbalance. Analyzing the selection of input features in the algorithm allowed a comparison of different configurations of the algorithm and showed a link between the surgical exposure and the surgeon's practice. CONCLUSION : This preliminary study validates that a prediction of the surgical exposure from spatial features is possible. The analysis of the clusters of feature selected by the algorithm also shows encouraging results and potential clinical interpretations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic surgery; Surgical expertise; Surgical exposure; Video-based analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31673963     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-019-02072-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  15 in total

1.  How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: clinical risk unit and association of litigation and risk management protocol.

Authors:  C Vincent; S Taylor-Adams; E J Chapman; D Hewett; S Prior; P Strange; A Tizzard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  High-fidelity, low-cost, automated method to assess laparoscopic skills objectively.

Authors:  Richard J Gray; Kanav Kahol; Gazi Islam; Marshall Smith; Alyssa Chapital; John Ferrara
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.891

3.  Performance comparison of various feature detector-descriptors and temporal models for video-based assessment of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Constantinos Loukas; Evangelos Georgiou
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.547

Review 4.  Surgical process modelling: a review.

Authors:  Florent Lalys; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Distinguishing surgical behavior by sequential pattern discovery.

Authors:  Arnaud Huaulmé; Sandrine Voros; Laurent Riffaud; Germain Forestier; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: overview of pathogenesis and risk factors.

Authors:  Angelo Iossa; Mohamed Abdelgawad; Brad Michael Watkins; Gianfranco Silecchia
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Comparison of the goals and MISTELS scores for the evaluation of surgeons on training benches.

Authors:  Rémi Wolf; Maud Medici; Gaëlle Fiard; Jean-Alexandre Long; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Philippe Cinquin; Sandrine Voros
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Sequential surgical signatures in micro-suturing task.

Authors:  Arnaud Huaulmé; Kanako Harada; Germain Forestier; Mamoru Mitsuishi; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  The "cost" of operative training for surgical residents.

Authors:  Timothy J Babineau; James Becker; Gary Gibbons; Stephen Sentovich; Donald Hess; Sharon Robertson; Michael Stone
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-04
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Athanasios G Pantelis; Georgios K Stravodimos; Dimitris P Lapatsanis
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Explaining a model predicting quality of surgical practice: a first presentation to and review by clinical experts.

Authors:  Arthur Derathé; Fabian Reche; Pierre Jannin; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Bernard Gibaud; Sandrine Voros
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.924

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.