| Literature DB >> 31673952 |
Kazuhito Suzuki1,2, Nobuhiro Tsukada3, Noriko Nishimura4, Yasuyuki Nagata5, Kiyoshi Okazuka3, Yuko Mishima4, Masahiro Yokoyama4, Kaichi Nishiwaki6,7, Tadao Ishida3, Shingo Yano7, Yasuhito Terui4, Kenshi Suzuki3.
Abstract
The combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) is used as induction treatment in multiple myeloma; however, the optimum schedule for this regimen remains controversial. In this retrospective study, we compared the efficacy and tolerability of twice-weekly VRD (twVRD) and modified VRD-lite in transplant-eligible myeloma patients. Fifty-five patients (median age 61 years) were included; 22 received twVRD (bortezomib [1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11] and lenalidomide [25 mg/body on days 1-14] over 21-day cycles) and 33 received modified VRD-lite (bortezomib [1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) and lenalidomide [15 mg/body on days 2-7, 9-14, 16-21] over 28-day cycles). Overall response, very good partial response, and complete response rates after VRD were 96.4%, 45.5%, and 20.0%, respectively (median follow-up period, 17.7 months). The 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 95.8% and 98.2%, respectively. The response rate and PFS were similar between the groups, regardless of cytogenetic risk and age. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2 and thrombocytopenia ≥ grade 3 was higher in the twVRD group (27.2% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.003 and 27.2% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.003). In conclusion, modified VRD-lite had similar efficacy with, but better tolerability than, twVRD in transplant-eligible patients.Entities:
Keywords: Bortezomib; Induction treatment; Lenalidomide; Multiple myeloma; Peripheral neuropathy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31673952 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-019-02764-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Hematol ISSN: 0925-5710 Impact factor: 2.319