| Literature DB >> 31673822 |
Huan Wang1, Rong Zhu1, Xiaolin Zhang1, Yun Li1,2, Leyi Ni1, Ping Xie3,4, Hong Shen5.
Abstract
Bacterial communities are an important part of biological diversity and biogeochemical cycling in aquatic ecosystems. In this study, the relationship amongst the phytoplankton species composition and abiotic environmental factors on seasonal changes in the community composition of free-living and attached bacteria in Lake Erhai were studied. Using Illumina high-throughput sequencing, we found that the impact of environmental factors on both the free-living and attached bacterial community composition was greater than that of the phytoplankton community, amongst which total phosphorus, Secchi disk, water temperature, dissolved oxygen and conductivity strongly influenced bacterial community composition. Microcystis blooms associated with subdominant Psephonema occurred during the summer and autumn, and Fragilaria, Melosira and Mougeotia were found at high densities in the other seasons. Only small numbers of algal species-specific bacteria, including Xanthomonadaceae (Proteobacteria) and Alcaligenaceae (Betaproteobacteria), were tightly coupled to Microcystis and Psephonema during Microcystis blooms. Redundancy analysis showed that although the composition of the bacterial communities was controlled by species composition mediated by changes in phytoplankton communities and abiotic environmental factors, the impact of the abiotic environment on both free-living and attached bacterial community compositions were greater than the impact of the phytoplankton community. These results suggest that the species composition of both free-living and attached bacterial communities are affected by abiotic environmental factors, even when under strong control by biotic factors, particularly dominant genera of Microcystis and Psephonema during algal blooms.Entities:
Keywords: Abiotic environmental factors; Attached bacteria; Free-living bacteria; Phytoplankton community; Variation partitioning in redundancy analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31673822 PMCID: PMC6823470 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-019-0889-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Fig. 1A map of Lake Erhai with the locations of the sampling sites
Fig. 2Seasonal variations in the phytoplankton phyla in Lake Erhai from May 2013 to October 2014 at the two sampling sites (a, b for site 1; c, d for site 2). a, c Densities of the phytoplankton phyla; b, d compositions of the phytoplankton phyla. Color codes represent the same phyla in each panel, and the Y-axis scales differ
Fig. 4Correlation heatmap amongst dominant phytoplankton genera, bacterial families and environmental parameters. a Attached bacterial families and environmental parameters; b free-living bacterial families and environmental parameters; c attached bacterial families and phytoplankton genera; d free-living bacterial families and phytoplankton genera. Different colors and spots represent shifted species associations. For clarity, connections between the remaining species are not displayed (starred numbers show the degree of significance; different colors show the different degrees of positive and negative connections)
Fig. 3Seasonal variations in the top 10 dominant bacterial families in Lake Erhai from May 2013 to October 2014 at the two sampling sites (a, b for site 1; c, d for site 2). a, c Composition of the 10 dominant attached bacterial families; b, d composition of the dominant free-living bacterial families. Color codes represent the same phyla in all pictures, and the Y-axis scales differ
Fig. 5Variation partitioning in redundancy analysis ordination of phytoplankton genera, bacterial families, and environmental parameters. a Attached bacterial families with environmental parameters and phytoplankton genera; b free-living bacterial families with environmental parameters and phytoplankton genera; c bacterial families with environmental parameters and phytoplankton genera; d attached bacterial families with free-living bacterial families, environmental parameters and phytoplankton genera; e free-living bacterial families with attached bacterial families, environmental parameters and phytoplankton genera. (Starred numbers indicate the level of significance)
Coupled effects of environmental factors and phytoplankton communities on the bacterial communities of the water columns
| System | Response variables | Predicted variables | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Five lakes, Sweden | Bacterial abundance (DGGE band number) | Nutrient content of the lakes, biomasses of microzooplankton, cryptophytes and chrysophytes | Lindström ( |
| Five mesotrophic lakes, Sweden | Bacterial abundance (DGGE band number) | T, diatom biomass, and cryptophyte biomass | Lindström ( |
| Lake Toolik, Alaska | Bacterial abundance (16S rRNA gene sequences of bacteria) | DOC (released by phytoplankton) | Crump et al. ( |
| Thirteen lakes in Wisconsin, USA | Bacterial abundance (ARISA fragment richness) | DOC, Chl | Yannarell and Triplett ( |
| Six north temperate humic lakes in Wisconsin, USA | Bacterial abundance (ARISA fragment richness) | Meteorological, environmental and biological data set | Kent et al. ( |
| Thirty-five rock pools at the Baltic Sea coast, Sweden | Bacterial abundance (T-RFLP data) | Spatial variables, salinity, Chl | Langenheder and Ragnarsson ( |
| Lake Taihu, China | Bacterial abundance (16S rRNA gene sequences of the bacteria) | Biomass of phytoplankton and WT | Niu et al. ( |
| Lake Taihu, China | Bacteria diversity (Shannon) and species richness (DGGE band number) | The similarities of | Shi et al. ( |
| Lake Erie, USA | Bacterial abundance (OTU richness) | Chl | Berry et al. ( |
| Two north temperate humic lakes in Vilas County, Wisconsin | Bacterial diversity (Bray–Curtis similarities) | Light, temperature, and phytoplankton | Paver and Kent ( |