Oh-Jin Kwon1, Seong-Il Bin2, Jong-Min Kim1, Bum-Sik Lee1, Sang-Min Lee3, Jun-Gu Park1, Gi-Woon Yoon1. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. sibin@amc.seoul.kr. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: No comparative studies of outcomes between degenerative medial meniscus posterior root tear (MM PRT) and non-root tear (NRT) have been conducted. This study aimed to compare joint survival and clinical outcome between MM PRT and MM NRT after partial meniscectomy with proper control of confounding factors. METHODS: One hundred and ten patients each in MM PRT and MM NRT groups who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy were retrospectively evaluated through propensity score matching. Joint survival was assessed on the basis of surgical and radiographic failures. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm score. RESULTS: The confounding variables were well balanced between the groups, with standardized mean differences of < 0.2 after propensity score matching. Failures occurred in 30 (27.3%) and 35 patients (31.8%) in the MM PRT group and MM NRT group, respectively. The estimated mean survival times were 12.5 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.5-13.5) and 11.7 years (10.7-12.7), respectively. There were no significant differences in the overall survival rate and Lysholm score between the two groups (n.s.). CONCLUSION: In middle-aged patients with degenerative MM PRT, joint survival and clinical outcome showed comparable results with those with MM NRT after partial meniscectomy. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is one of the effective treatments for MM PRT with consideration of various patient factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: No comparative studies of outcomes between degenerative medial meniscus posterior root tear (MM PRT) and non-root tear (NRT) have been conducted. This study aimed to compare joint survival and clinical outcome between MM PRT and MM NRT after partial meniscectomy with proper control of confounding factors. METHODS: One hundred and ten patients each in MM PRT and MM NRT groups who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy were retrospectively evaluated through propensity score matching. Joint survival was assessed on the basis of surgical and radiographic failures. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm score. RESULTS: The confounding variables were well balanced between the groups, with standardized mean differences of < 0.2 after propensity score matching. Failures occurred in 30 (27.3%) and 35 patients (31.8%) in the MM PRT group and MM NRT group, respectively. The estimated mean survival times were 12.5 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.5-13.5) and 11.7 years (10.7-12.7), respectively. There were no significant differences in the overall survival rate and Lysholm score between the two groups (n.s.). CONCLUSION: In middle-aged patients with degenerative MM PRT, joint survival and clinical outcome showed comparable results with those with MM NRT after partial meniscectomy. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is one of the effective treatments for MM PRT with consideration of various patient factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Antonio Klasan; Sven Edward Putnis; Vikram Kandhari; Takeshi Oshima; Brett Andrew Fritsch; David Anthony Parker Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-11-02 Impact factor: 4.342