| Literature DB >> 31672158 |
Bernat Córdoba-Jover1, Altamira Arce-Cerezo1, Jordi Ribera1, Montse Pauta1, Denise Oró1, Gregori Casals1,2, Guillermo Fernández-Varo1, Eudald Casals3,4,5, Victor Puntes3,4,6, Wladimiro Jiménez1,7, Manuel Morales-Ruiz8,9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cerium oxide nanoparticles are effective scavengers of reactive oxygen species and have been proposed as a treatment for oxidative stress-related diseases. Consequently, we aimed to investigate the effect of these nanoparticles on hepatic regeneration after liver injury by partial hepatectomy and acetaminophen overdose.Entities:
Keywords: Acetaminophen-induced liver injury; Cerium oxide nanoparticles; Liver regeneration; Oxidative stress; Partial hepatectomy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31672158 PMCID: PMC6822381 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-019-0544-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Fig. 1Characterization of cerium oxide nanoparticles. a, b Representative TEM images of CeO2NPs at different magnifications showing the non-aggregate and spherical shape of the engineered nanoparticles. Inset in b is a High Resolution TEM image of single particle showing pure CeO2 atomic planes; c UV–Visible absorption spectrum of the as-synthesized CeO2NPs; d XRD spectrum of the as-synthesized CeO2NPs after being dried under vacuum. e Z-Potential distribution and f Hydrodynamic diameter measured by DLS of the CeO2NPs dispersed in the physiological media (saline solution at pH = 5.5); g Cerium concentration in liver, spleen, lung and and kidney from rats treated with CeO2NPs for 90 min, 3, 6 and 8 weeks (n = 4 for each group). h Oxidative stress was quantified in non-treated and CeO2NPs-treated HepG2 cells by measuring DCF fluorescence in basal condition and after inducing oxidative stress with 2 mM H2O2 added to the culture medium (p < 0.0001 vs basal and *p < 0.0001 vs. non-treated, n = 10)
Fig. 2CeO2NPs treatment increased liver regeneration and cell proliferation after PHx. a Body weights of control rats without treatment and rats that received vehicle or CeO2NPs before PHx (n = 8). b Hepatic regenerative index at day 6 after PHx (n = 8, p < 0.05). c Blood levels of ALT (*p < 0.01), AST (*p < 0.05) and LDH (*p < 0.05) in vehicle or CeO2NPs-treated rats after 3 h post-PHx (n = 8; mean ± SEM). d Representative immunostaining for the Ki-67 antigen in liver histological sections of rats treated with either vehicle or CeO2NPs at different time points (t = 0 h, 24 h, 48 h, 7 days). Merged images show co-localization of Ki-67 (green) and nuclear DNA (DAPI, blue). Original magnification ×200 (n = 8 for each group and treatment). On the bottom, percentage quantification of positive Ki-67 liver cells for each time point and treatment (n = 8; mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05 compared with vehicle at the same time points)
Fig. 3CeO2NPs treatment reduces histological damage and increases cell proliferation after APAP-induced injury. a Hematoxylin-eosin stained liver sections (n = 13). After vehicle or CeO2NPs treatments, rats received 1 g/kg APAP and were sacrificed after 48 h (vehicle + APAP and CeO2NPs + APAP, respectively). Another group was treated with 300 mg/kg NAC 1 h after APAP (NAC + APAP). Also, healthy non-treated rats were included as experimental controls (upper left panel), ×100. b Quantification of HNE in liver from vehicle + APAP, NAC + APAP and CeO2NPs + APAP groups (n = 13; mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05). c Immunostaining for Ki-67 in liver of rats treated with vehicle + APAP, NAC + APAP and CeO2NPs + APAP. Ki-67 (green) and DAPI (blue), ×200. On the right, quantification of Ki-67 positive cells (n = 13; mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05)
Fig. 4CeO2NPs stimulates cell cycle progression and NF-κB activation. a Flow cytometry of HepG2 showing cell cycle profiles from propidium iodide DNA staining after vehicle or CeO2NPs treatment (n = 5; p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05). b Western blot for activated caspase 3 and cyclin D1 abundance from HepG2 incubated with vehicle or CeO2NPs. β-actin was used as loading control (mean ± SEM; n = 5; *p < 0.05 versus vehicle in the same experimental condition). O.D.: optical density. c Western blot for IκBα abundance from HepG2 (mean ± SEM; n = 5; *p < 0.05). d Transcription factor immunosorbent assay for NF-κB (p65) activity in HepG2 (n = 5, *p < 0.05). e Western blot for IκBα abundance in the liver vehicle and CeO2NPs-treated rats before and 3 h post-PHx (mean ± SEM; n = 5; #p < 0.01)