| Literature DB >> 31671872 |
Kathrin Happ1, Birgit Classen2.
Abstract
The thalloid liverwort Marchantia polymorpha as a member of a basal land plant lineage has to cope with the challenge of terrestrial life. Obviously, the plant cell wall has been strongly involved in the outstanding evolutionary process of water-to-land-transition. AGPs are signaling glycoproteins of the cell wall, which seem to be ubiquitous in seed plants and might play a role in adaption to abiotic and biotic stress situations. Therefore, we investigated the cell wall composition of Marchantia polymorpha with special focus on structural characterization of arabinogalactan-proteins. The Marchantia AGP shows typical features known from seed plant AGPs like precipitation with β-glucosyl-Yariv's reagent, a protein moiety with hydroxyproline and a carbohydrate part with 1,3,6-linked galactose and terminal arabinose residues. On the other hand, striking differences to AGPs of angiosperms are the occurrence of terminal 3-O-methyl-rhamnose and a highly branched galactan lacking appreciable amounts of 1,6-linked galactose. Binding of different AGP-antibodies (JIM13, KM1, LM2, LM6, LM14, LM26, and MAC207) to Marchantia AGP was investigated and confirmed structural differences between liverwort and angiosperm AGP, possibly due to deviating functions of these signaling molecules in the different taxonomic groups.Entities:
Keywords: AGP-antibodies; Marchantia polymorpha; arabinogalactan-protein; bryophyte; cell wall; liverwort; terrestrialization
Year: 2019 PMID: 31671872 PMCID: PMC6918356 DOI: 10.3390/plants8110460
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Neutral monosaccharide composition of the extracts from M. polymorpha in % (mol mol−1).
| Neutral Monosaccharide | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3- | 1.6 | ±0.3 | 1.1 | ±0.0 | 1.0 | ±0.1 | trace | |
| Rha | 4.8 | ±0.1 | 5.7 | ±1.3 | 11.5 | ±0.7 | 7.0 | ±0.1 |
| Fuc | 5.7 | ±0.0 | 5.3 | ±0.1 | 3.2 | ±0.3 | 2.4 | ±0.0 |
| Rib (?) | trace | 4.6 | ±0.0 | trace | trace | |||
| Ara | 17.7 | ±0.1 | 16.0 | ±0.3 | 24.7 | ±0.8 | 17.3 | ±0.1 |
| Xyl | 11.2 | ±0.3 | 10.7 | ±0.1 | 4.9 | ±4.1 | 15.1 | ±0.4 |
| Man | 6.8 | ±0.2 | 7.8 | ±0.1 | 8.9 | ±0.4 | 10.6 | ±0.2 |
| Gal | 20.1 | ±0.5 | 17.5 | ±0.3 | 33.0 | ±1.7 | 24.1 | ±0.1 |
| Glc | 32.2 | ±0.3 | 31.3 | ±0.3 | 12.9 | ±0.6 | 23.3 | ±0.3 |
trace: value < 1%.
Colorimetric determination of uronic acids in the extracts from M. polymorpha in %(m m−1).
|
| Uronic Acids |
|---|---|
| HMF | 4.2 ± 0.3 |
| (NH4)2C2O4 | 11.4 ± 0.2 |
| Na2CO3 | 4.9 ± 0.2 |
| KOH | 7.8 ± 0.0 |
Figure 1Gel diffusion assay with Yariv-fraction (10 mg/mL) and Yariv-supernatant (100 mg/mL) of M. polymorpha compared to Echinacea purpurea AGP (10 mg/mL).
Neutral monosaccharide composition of the Yariv-precipitated fraction, the corresponding supernatant and the partially hydrolyzed Yariv-fraction from M. polymorpha in % (mol mol−1).
| Neutral Monosaccharide | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gal | 46.9 | ± 0.3 | 23.4 | ± 0.1 | 79.6 |
| Ara | 31.6 | ± 0.5 | 22.7 | ± 0.1 | 2.1 |
| Glc | 9.5 | ± 0.7 | 9.4 | ± 0.2 | 10.3 |
| 3- | 2.5 | ± 0.2 | 2.1 | ± 0.2 | 1.5 |
| Rha | 2.4 | ± 0.1 | 8.0 | ± 0.1 | 1.6 |
| Rib (?) | 2.1 | ± 0.1 | trace | - | |
| Fuc | 1.8 | ± 0.1 | 8.9 | ± 0.1 | trace |
| Xyl | 1.6 | ± 0.1 | 17.8 | ± 0.2 | 2.7 |
| Man | 1.6 | ± 0.0 | 7.6 | ± 0.1 | 2.0 |
trace: value < 1%.
Figure 2Mass spectrum and fragmentation pattern of 3-O-Me-Rha in the Yariv fraction of M. polymorpha.
Neutral monosaccharide composition of Yariv-fractions from different bryophytes.
| Liverwort | Mosses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral Monosaccharide % ( |
|
|
| |
| Gal | 46.9 | 65.4 | 41.0 | 64.1 |
| Ara | 31.6 | 9.7 | 33.3 | 15.6 |
| Rha | 2.4 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 8.4 |
| 3- | 2.5 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 2.6 |
| others | 16.6 | 9.7 | 12.3 | 9.3 |
| Ara:Gal | 1:1.5 | 1:6.7 | 1:1.2 | 1:4.1 |
* published in [31].
Linkage type analysis of M. polymorpha AGP before and after partial acid hydrolysis (% mol mol−1).
| Monosaccharide | Linkage Type | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gal | 1,3,6- | 27.1 | 20.6 |
| 1,6- | - | 25.0 | |
| 1,4- | 4.3 | 17.4 | |
| 1,3- | 19.2 | 14.3 | |
| 1- | - | 22.7 | |
| Ara | 1,5- | 2.7 | - |
| 1,3- | 4.3 | - | |
| 1- | 36.3 | - | |
| Rha | 1,2,4- | 1.5 | - |
| 1,4- | 2.4 | - | |
| 1- | 2.2 | - |
Antibodies tested for binding to Marchantia AGP.
| Antibody | Epitope | Key References |
|---|---|---|
| JIM13 | AGP glycan, e.g., β-D-GlcA | [ |
| MAC 207 | AGP glycan, e.g., β-D-GlcA | [ |
| KM1 | (1→6)-β-D-Gal | [ |
| LM2 | (1→6)-β-D-Gal | [ |
| LM6 | (1→5)-α- | [ |
| LM14 | Type II AG in pectin or AGP glycan | [ |
| LM26 | Branched (1→4)-β-D-galactan | [ |
Figure 3Reactivity of Marchantia AGP, partially degraded Marchantia AGP (AGP-TFA) and Echinacea AGP with antibodies directed against AG glycan motifs in ELISA. (A) Overview on reactivity of Marchantia AGP and Marchantia AGP-TFA with the different antibodies. (B) JIM13. (C) KM1. (D) LM2. (E) LM26. (F) LM14. (G) MAC207. (H) LM6.