Maria D Mikkelsen1, Jesper Harholt2, Peter Ulvskov2, Ida E Johansen2, Jonatan U Fangel2, Monika S Doblin3, Antony Bacic3, William G T Willats2. 1. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark mdmi@plen.ku.dk. 2. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark. 3. ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The charophyte green algae (CGA) are thought to be the closest living relatives to the land plants, and ancestral CGA were unique in giving rise to the land plant lineage. The cell wall has been suggested to be a defining structure that enabled the green algal ancestor to colonize land. These cell walls provide support and protection, are a source of signalling molecules, and provide developmental cues for cell differentiation and elongation. The cell wall of land plants is a highly complex fibre composite, characterized by cellulose cross-linked by non-cellulosic polysaccharides, such as xyloglucan, embedded in a matrix of pectic polysaccharides. How the land plant cell wall evolved is currently unknown: early-divergent chlorophyte and prasinophyte algae genomes contain a low number of glycosyl transferases (GTs), while land plants contain hundreds. The number of GTs in CGA is currently unknown, as no genomes are available, so this study sought to give insight into the evolution of the biosynthetic machinery of CGA through an analysis of available transcriptomes. METHODS: Available CGA transcriptomes were mined for cell wall biosynthesis GTs and compared with GTs characterized in land plants. In addition, gene cloning was employed in two cases to answer important evolutionary questions. KEY RESULTS: Genetic evidence was obtained indicating that many of the most important core cell wall polysaccharides have their evolutionary origins in the CGA, including cellulose, mannan, xyloglucan, xylan and pectin, as well as arabino-galactan protein. Moreover, two putative cellulose synthase-like D family genes (CSLDs) from the CGA species Coleochaete orbicularis and a fragment of a putative CSLA/K-like sequence from a CGA Spirogyra species were cloned, providing the first evidence that all the cellulose synthase/-like genes present in early-divergent land plants were already present in CGA. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide new insights into the evolution of cell walls and support the notion that the CGA were pre-adapted to life on land by virtue of the their cell wall biosynthetic capacity. These findings are highly significant for understanding plant cell wall evolution as they imply that some features of land plant cell walls evolved prior to the transition to land, rather than having evolved as a result of selection pressures inherent in this transition.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The charophyte green algae (CGA) are thought to be the closest living relatives to the land plants, and ancestral CGA were unique in giving rise to the land plant lineage. The cell wall has been suggested to be a defining structure that enabled the green algal ancestor to colonize land. These cell walls provide support and protection, are a source of signalling molecules, and provide developmental cues for cell differentiation and elongation. The cell wall of land plants is a highly complex fibre composite, characterized by cellulose cross-linked by non-cellulosic polysaccharides, such as xyloglucan, embedded in a matrix of pectic polysaccharides. How the land plant cell wall evolved is currently unknown: early-divergent chlorophyte and prasinophyte algae genomes contain a low number of glycosyl transferases (GTs), while land plants contain hundreds. The number of GTs in CGA is currently unknown, as no genomes are available, so this study sought to give insight into the evolution of the biosynthetic machinery of CGA through an analysis of available transcriptomes. METHODS: Available CGA transcriptomes were mined for cell wall biosynthesis GTs and compared with GTs characterized in land plants. In addition, gene cloning was employed in two cases to answer important evolutionary questions. KEY RESULTS: Genetic evidence was obtained indicating that many of the most important core cell wall polysaccharides have their evolutionary origins in the CGA, including cellulose, mannan, xyloglucan, xylan and pectin, as well as arabino-galactan protein. Moreover, two putative cellulose synthase-like D family genes (CSLDs) from the CGA species Coleochaete orbicularis and a fragment of a putative CSLA/K-like sequence from a CGA Spirogyra species were cloned, providing the first evidence that all the cellulose synthase/-like genes present in early-divergent land plants were already present in CGA. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide new insights into the evolution of cell walls and support the notion that the CGA were pre-adapted to life on land by virtue of the their cell wall biosynthetic capacity. These findings are highly significant for understanding plant cell wall evolution as they imply that some features of land plant cell walls evolved prior to the transition to land, rather than having evolved as a result of selection pressures inherent in this transition.
Authors: Jean-Christophe Cocuron; Olivier Lerouxel; Georgia Drakakaki; Ana P Alonso; Aaron H Liepman; Kenneth Keegstra; Natasha Raikhel; Curtis G Wilkerson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-05-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kanwarpal S Dhugga; Roberto Barreiro; Brad Whitten; Kevin Stecca; Jan Hazebroek; Gursharn S Randhawa; Maureen Dolan; Anthony J Kinney; Dwight Tomes; Scott Nichols; Paul Anderson Journal: Science Date: 2004-01-16 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Olga A Zabotina; Wilhelmina T G van de Ven; Glenn Freshour; Georgia Drakakaki; David Cavalier; Gregory Mouille; Michael G Hahn; Kenneth Keegstra; Natasha V Raikhel Journal: Plant J Date: 2008-06-28 Impact factor: 6.417
Authors: Alan Little; Julian G Schwerdt; Neil J Shirley; Shi F Khor; Kylie Neumann; Lisa A O'Donovan; Jelle Lahnstein; Helen M Collins; Marilyn Henderson; Geoffrey B Fincher; Rachel A Burton Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2018-05-20 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Bram Van de Poel; Endymion D Cooper; Dominique Van Der Straeten; Caren Chang; Charles F Delwiche Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Alison W Roberts; Jelle Lahnstein; Yves S Y Hsieh; Xiaohui Xing; Kuok Yap; Arielle M Chaves; Tess R Scavuzzo-Duggan; George Dimitroff; Andrew Lonsdale; Eric Roberts; Vincent Bulone; Geoffrey B Fincher; Monika S Doblin; Antony Bacic; Rachel A Burton Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: Wei He; Jian Wu; Jin Xu; Dina A Mosselhy; Yudong Zheng; Siming Yang Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Jan Xue; Pallinti Purushotham; Justin F Acheson; Ruoya Ho; Jochen Zimmer; Ciaran McFarlane; Filip Van Petegem; Patrick T Martone; A Lacey Samuels Journal: J Exp Bot Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 7.298
Authors: Maria Dalgaard Mikkelsen; Jesper Harholt; Bjørge Westereng; David Domozych; Stephen C Fry; Ida Elisabeth Johansen; Jonatan U Fangel; Mateusz Łężyk; Tao Feng; Louise Nancke; Jørn D Mikkelsen; William G T Willats; Peter Ulvskov Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2021-06-17