| Literature DB >> 31671857 |
Pilar Aparicio-Martinez1,2,3, Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno4, María Pilar Martinez-Jimenez5, María Dolores Redel-Macías6, Claudia Pagliari7, Manuel Vaquero-Abellan8.
Abstract
Disordered eating attitudes are rapidly increasing, especially among young women in their twenties. These disordered behaviours result from the interaction of several factors, including beauty ideals. A significant factor is social media, by which the unrealistic beauty ideals are popularized and may lead to these behaviours. The objectives of this study were, first, to determine the relationship between disordered eating behaviours among female university students and sociocultural factors, such as the use of social network sites, beauty ideals, body satisfaction, body image and the body image desired to achieve and, second, to determine whether there is a sensitive relationship between disordered eating attitudes, addiction to social networks, and testosterone levels as a biological factor. The data (N = 168) was obtained using validated surveys (EAT-26, BSQ, CIPE-a, SNSA) and indirect measures of prenatal testosterone. The data was analysed using chi-square, Student's t-test, correlation tests and logistic regression tests. The results showed that disordered eating attitudes were linked to self-esteem (p < 0.001), body image (p < 0.001), body desired to achieve (p < 0.001), the use of social media (p < 0.001) and prenatal testosterone (p < 0.01). The findings presented in this study suggest a relationship between body image, body concerns, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating attitudes among college women.Entities:
Keywords: body image; disordered eating behaviours; female; social media; university students.
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31671857 PMCID: PMC6861923 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16214177
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flow chart of the recruitment and selection of the sample.
Mean, standard deviation and confidence intervals.
| Factors Studied in Women | Mean (SD) | CI 95% |
|---|---|---|
| Self-image | 3.56 (1.2) | 3.38–3.75 |
| Disordered eating | 18.34 (10.7) | 16.70–19.97 |
| Self-description | 3.99 (0.98) | 3.84–4.14 |
| Body satisfaction | 4.32 (1.48) | 4.1–4.54 |
| Desired body image | 2.99 (0.83) | 2.86–3.12 |
| Method of change | 1.98 (0.82) | 1.76–2.01 |
| Zone to change | 3.37 (1.95) | 3.08–3.67 |
| Self-perception | 2.76 (0.89) | 2.62–2.89 |
| Stereotypes | 2.59 (0.75) | 2.48–2.71 |
| Self-esteem | 31.10 (4.7) | 30.3–31.8 |
| SNS addiction | 14.69 (10.37) | 13.11–16.26 |
| Use of social media | 3.13 (0.72) | 3.02–3.24 |
| Frequency of connections | 3.46 (0.92) | 4.32–3.6 |
| Duration of the connections | 3.2 (1.17) | 3.02–3.38 |
| Importance of social media | 2.8 (0.87) | 2.67–2.94 |
Figure 2Results from the EAT-26 related to body satisfaction.
Correlations with body image that women perceived of themselves.
| Factors Studied in Women | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| Disordered eating attitudes | 0.29 | <0.001 |
| Self-description | 0.72 | <0.001 |
| Body satisfaction | −0.39 | <0.001 |
| Desired image | −0.46 | <0.001 |
| Method of change | 0.22 | <0.01 |
| Self-perception | −0.38 | <0.001 |
| Stereotypes | 0.38 | <0.001 |
| Self-esteem | −0.34 | <0.001 |
| 2D:4D ratio | 0.17 | <0.05 |
Correlations with having higher scores in the disordered eating attitudes test.
| Factors Studied in Women | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| Body Image | 0.32 | <0.001 |
| Self-description | 0.34 | <0.001 |
| Body satisfaction | −0.64 | <0.001 |
| Method of change | 0.37 | <0.01 |
| Self-perception | −0.38 | <0.001 |
| Stereotypes | 0.57 | <0.001 |
| Desired image | −0.19 | <0.05 |
| Zone to change | 0.35 | <0.001 |
| Self-esteem | −0.49 | <0.001 |
| Addiction to SNS | 0.18 | <0.05 |
| 2D:4D ratio | 0.41 | <0.001 |
Logistic regression for disordered eating attitudes.
| Non-Adjusted | Adjusted | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factors Studied in Women | ED (Yes) | ED (No) | OR | CI | OR | CI |
| Body Dissatisfaction | 3.35 (1.48) | 4.73 (0.21) | 0.49 | 0.38–0.64 | 0.54 | 0.33–0.87 |
| Desired image | 2.76 (0.14) | 3.19 (0.07) | 0.56 | 0.37–0.83 | 0.24 | 0.11–0.52 |
| Stereotypes | 3.15 (0.69) | 2.35 (0.98) | 5.17 | 2.95–9.06 | 2.56 | 1.16–0.65 |
| Self-esteem | 2.80 (0.53) | 3.26 (0.39) | 0.10 | 0.043–0.24 | 0.15 | 0.04–0.63 |
| Addiction to SNS | 0.96 (0.11) | 0.68 (0.57) | 1.71 | 0.56–0.74 | 0.48 | 0.23–1.01 |
| Duration of the connections | 3.43 (0.17) | 3.03 (0.09) | 1.32 | 1.4–1.76 | 1.68 | 1.05–2.69 |
| Testosterone levels (2D:4D ratio) | 1.20 (0.79) | 0.6 (0.79) | 2.49 | 1.62–3.62 | 3.13 | 1.60–6.12 |
Figure 3ROC curve from the logistic model for disordered eating.