| Literature DB >> 31671793 |
Laurence K Jennings1,2, Neyaz M D Khan3, Navdeep Kaur4,5, Daniel Rodrigues6,7, Christine Morrow8, Aoife Boyd9, Olivier P Thomas10.
Abstract
As part of an ongoing program to identify new bioactive compounds from Irish marine bioresources, we selected the subtidal sponge Spongosorites calcicola for chemical study, as fractions of this species displayed interesting cytotoxic bioactivities and chemical profiles. The first chemical investigation of this marine species led to the discovery of two new bisindole alkaloids of the topsentin family, together with six other known indole alkaloids. Missing the usual central core featured by the representatives of these marine natural products, the new metabolites may represent key biosynthetic intermediates for other known bisindoles. These compounds were found to exhibit weak cytotoxic activity against HeLa tumour cells, suggesting a specificity towards previously screened carcinoma and leukaemia cells.Entities:
Keywords: Spongosorites; bisindole alkaloid; cytotoxicity; marine natural products; sponge
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31671793 PMCID: PMC6864463 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24213890
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1New calcicamides A and B (1–2) and known indole alkaloids, trans-3,4-dihydrohamacanthin A (3), 6-bromodeoxytopsentin (4), 6-bromotopsentin (5), spongotine A (6), 2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetate methyl ester (7) and 2-(6-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetate methyl ester (8) from Spongosorites calcicola.
NMR data for 1 and 2 in DMSO-d6 (1H-NMR at 500 MHz and 13C-NMR at 125 MHz).
| Pos. | 1 | 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC, type | δH ( | HMBC | δC, type | δH ( | HMBC | |
| 1 | 11.29, d (2.3) | 2, 3, 3a, 7a | 11.45, d (2.2) | 2, 3, 3a, 7a | ||
| 2 | 124.6, CH | 7.43, d (2.3) | 3, 3a, 7a | 125.3, CH | 7.58, d (2.6) | 3, 3a, 7a |
| 3 | 112.6, C | 109.6, C | ||||
| 3a | 124.5, C | 124.7, C | ||||
| 4 | 120.3, CH | 7.64, d (8.7) | 3, 6, 7a | 120.3, CH | 7.71, d (8.5) | 3, 6, 7a |
| 5 | 121.8, CH | 7.18, dd (8.7, 1.9) | 3a, 6, 7 | 122.2, CH | 7.23, dd (8.5, 1.7) | 3a, 6, 7 |
| 6 | 114.2, C | 114.5, C | ||||
| 7 | 114.3, CH | 7.58, d (1.9) | 3a, 5, 6 | 114.6, CH | 7.63, d (1.7) | 3a, 5, 6 |
| 7a | 137.0, C | 136.8, C | ||||
| 8 | 42.7, CH | 5.55, td (9.3, 4.6) | 2, 3, 3a, 9′ | 46.9, CH | 4.83, q (6.2) | 2, 3, 3a, 9 |
| 9 | 41.1, CH2 | 3.49, m | 42.1, CH2 | 3.83, dt (13.8, 7.2) | 3, 8, 9′ | |
| 10-NH | 7.98, br s | 8.95, t (6.1) | 9, 9′ | |||
| 1′ | 12.27, d (3.2) | 2′, 3′ | 12.26, d (3.0) | 2′, 3′,3′a,7′a | ||
| 2′ | 138.6, CH | 8.80, d (3.2) | 3′, 3′a, 7′a | 138.7, CH | 8.77, d (3.3) | 3′, 3′a, 7′a |
| 3′ | 112.1, C | 112.1, C | ||||
| 3′a | 126.3, C | 126.3, C | ||||
| 4′ | 121.2, CH | 8.22, dd (7.2, 2.1) | 6′, 7′a | 121.3, CH | 8.22, dd (6.8, 2.3) | 6′, 7′a |
| 5′ | 122.6, CH | 7.23, td (7.2, 2.0) | 3′a, 7′ | 122.7, CH | 7.25, td (6.9, 2.2) | 3′a, 7′ |
| 6′ | 123.5, CH | 7.25, td (7.2, 2.0) | 4′, 7′a | 123.6, CH | 7.27, td (6.9, 2.3) | 4′, 7′a |
| 7′ | 112.6, CH | 7.53, dd (7.2, 2.0) | 3′a, 5′ | 112.7, CH | 7.54, dd (7.0, 2.2) | 3′a, 5′ |
| 7′a | 136.2, C | 136.2, C | ||||
| 8′ | 181.2, C | 180.9, C | ||||
| 9′ | 163.1, C | 163.7, C | ||||
| 10′-NH | 9.15, d (9.2) | 8, 9′ | 8.33, br d (4.3) | 3 | ||
Figure 2Comparison between the two TDDFT predicted electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectra of both enantiomers of 1 and the experimental spectrum of 1.
Scheme 1Biosynthetic hypothesis for the calcicamide, hamacanthin, coscinamides, and topsentin derivatives.