Literature DB >> 31670216

Comparing in person and internet methods to recruit low-SES populations for tobacco control policy research.

Amelia Greiner Safi1, Carolyn Reyes2, Emma Jesch3, Joseph Steinhardt4, Jeff Niederdeppe5, Christofer Skurka6, Motasem Kalaji5, Leah Scolere7, Sahara Byrne5.   

Abstract

Tobacco use and the associated consequences are much more prevalent among low-SES populations in the U.S. However, tobacco-based research often does not include these harder-to-reach populations. This paper compares the effectiveness and drawbacks of three methods of recruiting low-SES adult smokers in the Northeast. From a 5-year, [funding blinded] grant about impacts of graphic warning labels on tobacco products, three separate means of recruiting low-SES adult smokers emerged: 1) in person in the field with a mobile lab vehicle, 2) in person in the field with tablet computers, and 3) online via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). We compared each of these methods in terms of the resulting participant demographics and the "pros" and "cons" of each approach including quality control, logistics, cost, and engagement. Field-based methods (with a mobile lab or in person with a tablet) yielded a greater proportion of disadvantaged participants who could be biochemically verified as current smokers-45% of the field-based sample had an annual income of <$10,000 compared to 16% of the MTurk sample; 40-45% of the field-based sample did not complete high school compared to 2.6% of the MTurk sample. MTurk-based recruitment was substantially less expensive to operate (1/14th the cost of field-based methods) was faster, and involved less logistical coordination, though was unable to provide immediate biochemical verification of current smoking status. Both MTurk and field-based methods provide access to low-SES participants-the difference is the proportion and the degree of disadvantage. For research and interventions where either inclusion considerations or external validity with low-SES populations is critical, especially the most disadvantaged, our research supports the use of field-based methods. It also highlights the importance of adequate funding and time to enable the recruitment and participation of these harder-to-reach populations.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amazon mechanical turk; Disadvantage; Field based sampling; Inclusion; Internet sampling; Low-SES; Recruitment; Tobacco control policy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31670216      PMCID: PMC7047999          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  30 in total

Review 1.  Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples.

Authors:  Jesse Chandler; Danielle Shapiro
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 18.561

Review 2.  Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants.

Authors:  Antronette K Yancey; Alexander N Ortega; Shiriki K Kumanyika
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  The importance of tobacco research focusing on marginalized groups.

Authors:  Megan Passey; Billie Bonevski
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 4.  Recruitment and retention of rural African Americans in diabetes research: lessons learned.

Authors:  Wanda Anderson Loftin; Steven K Barnett; Peggy Summers Bunn; Patra Sullivan
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.140

5.  Effects of Varying Color, Imagery, and Text of Cigarette Package Warning Labels among Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Middle School Youth and Adult Smokers.

Authors:  Sahara Byrne; Amelia Greiner Safi; Deena Kemp; Christofer Skurka; Julie Davydova; Leah Scolere; Alan D Mathios; Rosemary J Avery; Michael C Dorf; Joseph Steinhardt; Jeff Niederdeppe
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-12-13

6.  Similarities and Differences in Tobacco Control Research Findings From Convenience and Probability Samples.

Authors:  Michelle Jeong; Dongyu Zhang; Jennifer C Morgan; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Amira Osman; Marcella H Boynton; Jennifer R Mendel; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-03-28

7.  The social context of smoking: A qualitative study comparing smokers of high versus low socioeconomic position.

Authors:  Christine L Paul; Samantha Ross; Jamie Bryant; Wesley Hill; Billie Bonevski; Nichola Keevy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Diane B Francis; Christy Bridges; Jennah M Sontag; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Use of web and in-person survey modes to gather data from young adults on sex and drug use: an evaluation of cost, time, and survey error based on a randomized mixed-mode design.

Authors:  Barbara J McMorris; Renee S Petrie; Richard F Catalano; Charles B Fleming; Kevin P Haggerty; Robert D Abbott
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2008-11-24

10.  Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2016.

Authors:  Ahmed Jamal; Elyse Phillips; Andrea S Gentzke; David M Homa; Stephen D Babb; Brian A King; Linda J Neff
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  4 in total

1.  Direct Outreach in Bars and Clubs to Enroll Cigarette Smokers in Mobile Cessation Services: Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Patricia Chalela; Alfred L McAlister; Cliff Despres; Edgar Muñoz; Pramod Sukumaran; David Akopian; Sahak Kaghyan; Jesus Trujillo; Amelie G Ramirez
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  PROmotion of COvid-19 VA(X)ccination in the Emergency Department-PROCOVAXED: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert M Rodriguez; Kelli O'Laughlin; Stephanie A Eucker; Anna Marie Chang; Kristin L Rising; Graham Nichol; Alena Pauley; Hemal Kanzaria; Alexzandra T Gentsch; Cindy Li; Herbie Duber; Jonathan Butler; Vidya Eswaran; Dave Glidden
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.728

3.  PROmotion of COvid-19 VA(X)ccination in the Emergency Department - PROCOVAXED: Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Robert Rodriguez; Kelli O'Laughlin; Stephanie Eucker; Anna Marie Chang; Kristin Rising; Graham Nichol; Alena Pauley; Hemal Kanzaria; Alexzandra Gentsch; Cindy Li; Herbie Duber; Jonathan Butler; Vidya Eswaran; Dave Glidden
Journal:  Res Sq       Date:  2022-03-17

4.  Use of Telephone and Digital Channels to Engage Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Adults in Health Disparities Research Within a Social Service Setting: Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Kassandra I Alcaraz; Rhyan N Vereen; Donna Burnham
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.